Overview:
Ethereum vs. Polygon: what is the difference, and which one is better? This dilemma is lately mostly discussed among creators. The choice of the network plays a vital role in the project’s success. But it also draws interest from the other crypto and blockchain enthusiasts. In this article, we thoroughly compare Ethereum and Polygon blockchain platforms.
** I will try to analyze the main metrics of both blockchains with the RRR model (Reach-Retention-Revenue) and issue my verdict.
All charts was created with Increment tool from Covalent team and you can check it through this link **
https://www.covalenthq.com/platform/increment/#/pages/al_rskl1210/ethereum-vs-polygon-by-rskl/
Reach:


Retention:
A few key concepts: 1. DAU - daily active users. Users that interact with blockchain 1 or more time per day. 2. MAU - monthly active users. Users that interact with blockchain 1 or more time per month. 3. Stickiness Ratio - Ratio of DAU / MAU (in %)
4. Active user days / Week - Days when users make actions with blockchain in one week.




Revenue:



Conclusion:
Polygon is a good analogue of Ethereum with cheap commissions and good statistics, if you want to create a project and spend less money on its maintenance, then Matic is your choice, but if you want a larger solvent audience, then it is better to create something on Ethereum.
This document was prepared for Week 1 of Covalent Data Alchemist Bootcamp Season 2 by [rskl]

