Excellent: The project excels in all evaluated aspects, with solid plans, full transparency, and no significant risks. Credibility is exceptionally high, making it a benchmark for quality.

Very good: High-quality development, risk management, and execution, with very few areas needing improvement. Credibility is strong, ensuring trustworthiness and reliability.

Good: The project is reliable and well-founded, though some minor areas require strengthening. Credibility is above average, ensuring confidence in its outcomes.

Acceptable: The project meets basic standards but has key areas for improvement to minimize manageable risks. Credibility is moderate, requiring more evidence to inspire trust.

Fair: The project shows progress but has significant issues impacting its overall viability. Credibility is questionable, and further validation is needed to gain confidence.

Poor: Several serious deficiencies in technical, social, or financial aspects; substantial adjustments are required. Credibility is low, with major doubts about its potential.

Bad: The project has severe structural problems and lacks viability; the risk is extremely high. Credibility is negligible, with no basis for confidence in its success.