What is earnable proof of humanity and how should it work?
Proving you're human could be extremely rewarding, basing human verification on the idea of earnable proof of humanity points could revolutionize Lens Protocol. These innovative points allow you to earn credit for completing tasks attesting that you are more likely real person, and could potentially unlock a variety of benefits in the online world. In this article, you will discover how proof of humanity points can change the way we think about online security and verification, and how t...
Wav3s Distribution Analysis
Quick hitting, short form analysis on the short term effects of my wav3s experiment: Funds earned: roughly 3 WMATIC Funds put up for bounties: roughly 18 WMATIC Funds from bounties paid out: roughly 2.3 WMATC Amount of engagement for me has risen about 4000% in total there have been 1800 engagements with my post. Collects of my posts is up from a total of 2 this month to 64. The amount of followers I’ve gained is 29 (about a 20% increase) Comparing the difference between my best amount of eng...
Pros and cons to a tiered Lens Profile system
Pros: Provides a variety of accessible options for users with differing amounts of freedom and economic support for the infrastructure. Provides an easy way to onboard users who do not care about social graphs but care about not getting their data farmed and having social graph sovereignty amongst a plethora of apps. Incentivizes users financially to use low tier lens profiles before ascending by providing a post-to-earn model. Provides a world-class UX for any normie and caters to a fully so...
What is earnable proof of humanity and how should it work?
Proving you're human could be extremely rewarding, basing human verification on the idea of earnable proof of humanity points could revolutionize Lens Protocol. These innovative points allow you to earn credit for completing tasks attesting that you are more likely real person, and could potentially unlock a variety of benefits in the online world. In this article, you will discover how proof of humanity points can change the way we think about online security and verification, and how t...
Wav3s Distribution Analysis
Quick hitting, short form analysis on the short term effects of my wav3s experiment: Funds earned: roughly 3 WMATIC Funds put up for bounties: roughly 18 WMATIC Funds from bounties paid out: roughly 2.3 WMATC Amount of engagement for me has risen about 4000% in total there have been 1800 engagements with my post. Collects of my posts is up from a total of 2 this month to 64. The amount of followers I’ve gained is 29 (about a 20% increase) Comparing the difference between my best amount of eng...
Pros and cons to a tiered Lens Profile system
Pros: Provides a variety of accessible options for users with differing amounts of freedom and economic support for the infrastructure. Provides an easy way to onboard users who do not care about social graphs but care about not getting their data farmed and having social graph sovereignty amongst a plethora of apps. Incentivizes users financially to use low tier lens profiles before ascending by providing a post-to-earn model. Provides a world-class UX for any normie and caters to a fully so...

Subscribe to zkJew

Subscribe to zkJew
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
<100 subscribers
<100 subscribers
DeSo DeSo probably has the best competitive design to attack because of all the information it stores and has acceptable UX, however, I am not a fan of reinventing an L1 and being self dependent on security. However, it has a wonderful array of an app ecosystem.
Orbis club Orbis Club goes a little further than DeSo in terms of the multi chain thesis. It allows for the minting and posting from virtually any chain. It reminds me a lot of the whole let’s build an L1 blockchain just to bridge but this time it’s to store all of the future of social media, if it incentivizes the ceramic using restaking of ETH, SOL, and AVAX + I could get behind the design more than any other competitor, but it’s still obviously in extremely early stages and the information on it is lacking.
Farcaster To be brutally honest, I hate the design of the project. The founder talks about onboarding the a billion people to social media by minting profiles on L1. On a good day now that’s probably around 15 billion dollars on gas alone. Not to mention transactions and the lack luster amount of storage of profile data. Each profile is only allowed to have 10k saved posts on chain with the old ones being phased out. Even worse in my opinion this data is proposed to only be stored by 100 nodes. The project runs great on test net, but that’s practically free block space.
Overall, I think each protocol is trying to work around Lens’ model rather than compete head to head. Just because Lens isn’t omnichain now doesn’t mean it can’t be with an ONFT standard wrapped for the profile, integrated on Holograph and deployed on other EVMs and VMs, but considering the likely hood that all the technicals are abstracted away and the gasless experience is driven by revenue from users is high and the goal. It seems unnecessary especially because it decreases security and interoperability for the user.
DeSo DeSo probably has the best competitive design to attack because of all the information it stores and has acceptable UX, however, I am not a fan of reinventing an L1 and being self dependent on security. However, it has a wonderful array of an app ecosystem.
Orbis club Orbis Club goes a little further than DeSo in terms of the multi chain thesis. It allows for the minting and posting from virtually any chain. It reminds me a lot of the whole let’s build an L1 blockchain just to bridge but this time it’s to store all of the future of social media, if it incentivizes the ceramic using restaking of ETH, SOL, and AVAX + I could get behind the design more than any other competitor, but it’s still obviously in extremely early stages and the information on it is lacking.
Farcaster To be brutally honest, I hate the design of the project. The founder talks about onboarding the a billion people to social media by minting profiles on L1. On a good day now that’s probably around 15 billion dollars on gas alone. Not to mention transactions and the lack luster amount of storage of profile data. Each profile is only allowed to have 10k saved posts on chain with the old ones being phased out. Even worse in my opinion this data is proposed to only be stored by 100 nodes. The project runs great on test net, but that’s practically free block space.
Overall, I think each protocol is trying to work around Lens’ model rather than compete head to head. Just because Lens isn’t omnichain now doesn’t mean it can’t be with an ONFT standard wrapped for the profile, integrated on Holograph and deployed on other EVMs and VMs, but considering the likely hood that all the technicals are abstracted away and the gasless experience is driven by revenue from users is high and the goal. It seems unnecessary especially because it decreases security and interoperability for the user.
No activity yet