Gnoland is looking to adopt a dual-token model similar to the original idea of ​​Cosmos, where "fee utility" is stripped from the governance token. As Jae Kwon suggested, a two-token model using a fee token with a fixed constant inflation rate (rather than indexing like a staking token) would have the following advantages over a single-token model: Most end-users are technically ignorant, which means that most of them don’t know which validators they should support and how to evaluate governance proposals. In short, the dual-token model mitigates operational risk by shifting governance responsibility from end users to nodes, validators, and network stakeholders who have a practical understanding of the blockchain. The purpose of governance tokens is to stake them on the network for the security of the blockchain. The irony of the single-token model is that the more traction a blockchain gains, the more likely it is to earn more tokens as gas fees, which can lead to a decrease in the security of the network. Having a dual token model solves this problem. A fixed-inflation-fee token specifically designed to power blockchain contracts will allow users to keep tokens in wallets for future use without fear of inflating their value.

Why we need more attention to #Gnoland? As Jae Kwon says "It’s a next gen smart contracting platform. http://Gno.land. #Plan9 on steroids. Imagine #Ethereum 3.0. If you are also interested in gno land, you might as well join them now. This way Gnoland pushes for full transparency, because it forces developers to push their sources, and not compiled bytecode. Gnolang will also introduce multi-threading in smart contract development