Summary: In several years of recidivism, there has been a clear “good currency expulsion” phenomenon among many domestic producers, which has proven to be good winners among the winners, and HomeKit, whose birth is apple, is now overshadowed by “deficitious currency”.

The market has now been characterized by a period of stable and calm development, after several years of developments in hardware manufacturers and platform solution providers in the field of smart home ownership, following the “lost of the night” in 2014. During the year, major producers made odds for their own market share, and apples were not behind as a scientific and technological giant, and in the same year a smart home platform, HomeKit, was launched. However, after more than five years of development, even when some of the apples users are now questioned, there is no need to know what HomeKit is and what it is. Why do HomeKit, born with a gold-key, still have few people in question?

HomeKit is an intelligent home platform issued by apples in 2014, a software project. The apples themselves do not produce products carrying the HomeKit system, but rather authorize third-party manufacturers to produce equipment consistent with apparel compatibility and safety standards. Domestic producers were also taking time to introduce different hardware products to occupy markets, and the introduction of apples to HomeKit as a smart home platform seemed to be a more advanced step, not only by relying on their own hardware to take up the market, but by working with third-party manufacturers to put partners on their own, and to create “coupling the walls” effect for market penetration. Unfortunately, this seemingly unadversarial idea was hit by apples themselves in the course of achieving it.

The HomeKit platform was launched in 2014 and the first HomeKit smart home product (no more) was released in June 2015 and the introduction of the “HOME” application in the IOS10 system in 2016, and the management control of smart home equipment in support of the HomeKit framework has been implemented.

From roll-out to application to integration control, apples take two years before HomeKit is actually used in actual life. The two-year period may be described as a “relapse” for the fast-moving intelligent home industry. A large number of manufacturers that create “intelligent home” have emerged, and a variety of equipment, such as smart routers, smart radios, smart gateways, etc., have been introduced in an effort to occupy the market through the acquisition of hardware equipment. And the most powerful of these are the layouts of small-mart households.

Multi-equipped intelligent combinations can be achieved through a small-metre router as a hub for smart household equipment. As of June 2015, small-smart home online equipment was over 10 million, APP installed over 15 million users and more than 2 million people per day, becoming the first global intelligent home platform. In parallel, apples have just released their first products, which are slow.

Here, it was said that the slow pace of apples was due to a strong performance standard, as was the case with the strict certification requirements of AirPlay and MFi. But is this really justified or excused? This is considered by the cataloguing of apples.

In order to begin in the field of military intelligent home, in 2015 China launched an open interconnection platform for HUAWEI HiLink intelligent families. In a short four-year period, the HiLink platform has now accumulated more than 200,000 users, access more than 50 types of products, work with over 100 plants to cover more than 300 products; and the WiFi home facility, which is connected to the HiLink agreement, has reached about 4 million. More importantly, China will provide partners with four major sources of resources: users, technology, branding and access.

The reverse apples are also working with third-party manufacturers, but in parallel, they are far less relevant in terms of both the number of partners and the resources for communication with partners. Moreover, in contrast to the prices of smart home products, the prices of hundreds of or even thousands of people were driven by consumer expectations, while the prices of the smart home products introduced by the Miner, HUAWEI HiLink were more consistent with consumer acceptance.

Potential apples are aware of the dangers of self-sustaining, starting last year with a reduction in postures and working to interact with third-party manufacturers. In the case of the well-known Swedish furniture company, which has combined intelligent light bulbs, intelligent brands, etc., the branding of the green mAqara and tinols has directly lowered the entry threshold of HomeKit, allowing for a wide range of fruit powders to enjoy the convenience of the HomeKit enabling access at a more affordable price.

In the case of HomeKit, the current development situation remains open to Rome, with the choice of cooperation with third-party eco-unions being the most fundamental option, and it is the most appropriate way to expand the market by facilitating authentication solutions, reducing the threshold of entry into HomeKit, using its own market brand advantage, providing market resources to developers, taking advantage of the existing social resource advantages.

In several years of recidivism among many domestic producers, there has been a clear “good currency expulsion” phenomenon, which is good and bad, and is alive for the winners of the winners, while HomeKit, who is a source of apples, is now overshadowed by a “deficitious currency”. When apples resolved the problem of sequestration, HomeKit needed better development, essentially in the third-party ecology union, to tap into potential partners and help them to produce the effects of “coupling the walls”, adding to the apples’ own advantages, so that HomeKit would be better able to stay in the intellectual home, rather than becoming a failure of industrial development. (Source: Pacific Computer Network OldDog)