
如何在Fuel的测试网络上部署智能合约
在Fuel测试网络上部署智能合约的保姆级指南部署智能合约不需要特殊的系统,只需要像 Linux Ubuntu 22.04 (LTS) x64 OS 这样的编码环境你可以在 Windows 系统里安装 Ubuntu Linux 或者在阿里云或者腾讯云这样的云服务器商那里租用VPS。部署智能合约的步骤1.安装依赖:Rustcurl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSf https://sh.rustup.rs | sh rustup update stable rustup default stable 2.安装Fuelup工具链2.1 安装Fuelupcurl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSf https://fuellabs.github.io/fuelup/fuelup-init.sh | sh 按*Y,然后按键盘上的回车键*export PATH="$HOME/.fuelup/bin:$PATH" source /root/.bashrc 如果任何以 Fuelup或Forc开头的命令不起作用,您可以使用上面的命令来修复它...

用Fuel扩展Ethereum
为什么非传统的虚拟机对于扩展Ethereum至关重要?免责声明:本文由一名Fuel社区成员翻译。为了提供准确的翻译,我们进行了仔细的检查,但仍然不排除会有错误或遗漏。Fuellabs不对翻译信息的准确性、可靠性或及时性负责。 原文:Scaling Ethereum with Fuel非传统虚拟机对扩展Ethereum至关重要尽管目前的环境中新的L1越来越流行,Ethereum在许多方面仍然是web3领域的龙头。它是由开发者和终端用户组成的一个庞大生态系统,在共识和数据可用性层有一个强大的可扩展性路线图,还有大量的流动性。Ethereum拥有比任何其他区块链都多得多的资产(来源:DefiLlama)毫无疑问,通过在现有Ethereum生态系统中来进行构建,可以捕获到很多价值,正如Ethereum上构建的许多rollups和L2扩展解决方案就证明了这一点。 但与此同时,也有越来越多的人认为EVM和Solidity正变得越来越不那么重要了。 https://twitter.com/DennisonBertram/status/1586114575107244032?s=20&t=L-F...

对于所有人的账户抽象化
许多人将账户抽象描述为“一旦满足某些条件就自动执行交易”的一种手段。 如果您正在实施无状态帐户抽象,则只有其中一部分情况是可能的 - 您应该这样做!免责声明:本文由一名Fuel社区的成员翻译。为了提供准确的翻译,我们进行了仔细的检查,但仍然不排除会有错误或遗漏。Fuellabs不对翻译信息的准确性、可靠性或及时性负责。 原文:Account Abstraction For Everyone Else什么是账户抽象?一般来说,账户抽象是指以编程方式设置交易的有效性条件的能力。 这些不是账户抽象:支付用户的 Gas 费用原生多重签名基于“社交登录”的 web3auth您可以通过帐户抽象实现来执行这些操作。 我们稍后将更深入地讨论由Vitalik等人撰写的EIP-4337,它说:“实现账户抽象的关键目标:允许用户使用包含任意验证逻辑的智能合约钱包,而不是EOA作为他们的主要账户。” 目前,在Ethereum上,交易在以下情况下有效:有足够的余额来支付Gas。Nonce 是正确的。拥有有效的数字签名。但是,如果开发人员可以定义一组不同的条件,在这些条件下事务是有效的呢?无状态VS有状态帐...
喜欢模块化,喜欢ZK。 🕊 推特:https://x.com/GXingPing


如何在Fuel的测试网络上部署智能合约
在Fuel测试网络上部署智能合约的保姆级指南部署智能合约不需要特殊的系统,只需要像 Linux Ubuntu 22.04 (LTS) x64 OS 这样的编码环境你可以在 Windows 系统里安装 Ubuntu Linux 或者在阿里云或者腾讯云这样的云服务器商那里租用VPS。部署智能合约的步骤1.安装依赖:Rustcurl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSf https://sh.rustup.rs | sh rustup update stable rustup default stable 2.安装Fuelup工具链2.1 安装Fuelupcurl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSf https://fuellabs.github.io/fuelup/fuelup-init.sh | sh 按*Y,然后按键盘上的回车键*export PATH="$HOME/.fuelup/bin:$PATH" source /root/.bashrc 如果任何以 Fuelup或Forc开头的命令不起作用,您可以使用上面的命令来修复它...

用Fuel扩展Ethereum
为什么非传统的虚拟机对于扩展Ethereum至关重要?免责声明:本文由一名Fuel社区成员翻译。为了提供准确的翻译,我们进行了仔细的检查,但仍然不排除会有错误或遗漏。Fuellabs不对翻译信息的准确性、可靠性或及时性负责。 原文:Scaling Ethereum with Fuel非传统虚拟机对扩展Ethereum至关重要尽管目前的环境中新的L1越来越流行,Ethereum在许多方面仍然是web3领域的龙头。它是由开发者和终端用户组成的一个庞大生态系统,在共识和数据可用性层有一个强大的可扩展性路线图,还有大量的流动性。Ethereum拥有比任何其他区块链都多得多的资产(来源:DefiLlama)毫无疑问,通过在现有Ethereum生态系统中来进行构建,可以捕获到很多价值,正如Ethereum上构建的许多rollups和L2扩展解决方案就证明了这一点。 但与此同时,也有越来越多的人认为EVM和Solidity正变得越来越不那么重要了。 https://twitter.com/DennisonBertram/status/1586114575107244032?s=20&t=L-F...

对于所有人的账户抽象化
许多人将账户抽象描述为“一旦满足某些条件就自动执行交易”的一种手段。 如果您正在实施无状态帐户抽象,则只有其中一部分情况是可能的 - 您应该这样做!免责声明:本文由一名Fuel社区的成员翻译。为了提供准确的翻译,我们进行了仔细的检查,但仍然不排除会有错误或遗漏。Fuellabs不对翻译信息的准确性、可靠性或及时性负责。 原文:Account Abstraction For Everyone Else什么是账户抽象?一般来说,账户抽象是指以编程方式设置交易的有效性条件的能力。 这些不是账户抽象:支付用户的 Gas 费用原生多重签名基于“社交登录”的 web3auth您可以通过帐户抽象实现来执行这些操作。 我们稍后将更深入地讨论由Vitalik等人撰写的EIP-4337,它说:“实现账户抽象的关键目标:允许用户使用包含任意验证逻辑的智能合约钱包,而不是EOA作为他们的主要账户。” 目前,在Ethereum上,交易在以下情况下有效:有足够的余额来支付Gas。Nonce 是正确的。拥有有效的数字签名。但是,如果开发人员可以定义一组不同的条件,在这些条件下事务是有效的呢?无状态VS有状态帐...

喜欢模块化,喜欢ZK。 🕊 推特:https://x.com/GXingPing

Subscribe to 473

Subscribe to 473
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
<100 subscribers
<100 subscribers
Let’s talk about why you should buy $INIT from the perspective of a secondary market investor.
$INIT is the native token of initia, which has uses such as gas, governance, and liquidity staking.As an investor, we are very happy to see XX native token become a gas coin. After all, this is one of the very basic and practical cases.Many tokens only have the functions of staking and governance, which is indeed not so sexy for investors.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think these factors will affect the price of $INIT in the early and mid-term.
Unlike most projects, INITIA's founder, Zon, has mentioned that the $INIT held by investors and the team is not only subject to a lock-up period but also cannot be staked.Non-stakable—Wow! Beautiful word, right? This means that two scenarios could occur in the early stages:
The on-chain APY is extremely high, attracting whales to purchase large amounts of $INIT to "capture" these profits, driving up the price of $INIT.
If whales are not interested in $INIT, the high APY will persist for a long time, benefiting long-term holders.(Sorry holder, I think the first one is more likely😭)
https://x.com/ItsAlwaysZonny/status/1839642332041289749
Simply put, after TGE, either the apy on the initia chain will be extremely high, or the price of $INIT will soar. I wonder if you still remember Evmos and Celestia. Especially Evmos, where the early APY was extremely high (200%+), attracting many whales to purchase EVMOS from the market to capture APY profits.However, similar to Celestia, the team and investors hold a large amount of tokens that can be staked, generating significant daily interest income. They often use this income to dump on the market, causing both the token price and APY to plummet. This is why "tokens held by investors and the team cannot be staked" is extremely important.
Additionally, another use case for $INIT is liquidity staking (similar to the pools in Osmosis). Regardless of which liquidity pool you participate in, you must pair it with $INIT. Imagine users participating in an XX/INIT liquidity pool and receiving additional ecosystem airdrops as rewards👀.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think these factors will affect the long-term price of $INIT.
I think the governance function of $INIT is also very interesting and practical, because the pledged $INIT not only protects network security, but also directly affects the core of initia - the "VIP" mechanism.
After the mainnet launch, 10% of the $INIT tokens will be allocated to the VIP reward pool. Each cycle will last two weeks, and the rewards for each cycle will be split into two reward pools: the Balance Pool and the Voting Pool.
Balance pool: Encourage initia's ecosystem to "grab" users' $INIT. The more $INIT is retained in a certain ecological project, the greater its share in this pool!
Voting pool: Voting is based on the $INIT that users stake in L1. Stakers can split their votes. For example, if you have 99 votes, you can choose to vote 30% for A, 30% for B, and 40% for C. The higher the score of the ecosystem, the higher the reward weight.
Of course, I believe these rewards will be distributed to users in the form of esINIT. (esINIT is non-transferable, and users must either maintain a VIP rating or convert esINIT for liquidity staking to unlock it.)

Therefore, after the mainnet launch, each transaction made by a user may potentially earn a reward. However, to unlock and earn more rewards, users will likely put more $INIT on-chain, participate in more activities, and align themselves with more ecosystems.The VIP mechanism will also drive ecosystem evolution. Think about it: if you don’t offer users additional rewards or provide content that is attractive enough to them, why would they be willing to leave their $INIT with you and vote for you?(So, it's likely that the rewards aren't just from staking $INIT, but also VIP rewards and additional incentives from the ecosystem side.)

So, let’s simplify it: thanks to the genius team’s design, $INIT’s utility is indeed very practical. Users buy some $INIT and then explore on the chain, and get esINIT rewards. In order to unlock and get more rewards, they will continue to participate in more ecological activities. In order to attract more users, more ecological projects will also add additional reward mechanisms. Multiple rewards attracted more new users, new users brought more funds to buy $INIT , and more development teams began to build interwoven rollups , which in turn brought more rewards.
Wow! Maybe even O'Neal's defensive fouls can't stop this flywheel from moving forward!?

If you are a secondary investor, and there is a token in front of you whose price and ecology are driven by a positive flywheel, will you miss it?
Let’s talk about why you should buy $INIT from the perspective of a secondary market investor.
$INIT is the native token of initia, which has uses such as gas, governance, and liquidity staking.As an investor, we are very happy to see XX native token become a gas coin. After all, this is one of the very basic and practical cases.Many tokens only have the functions of staking and governance, which is indeed not so sexy for investors.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think these factors will affect the price of $INIT in the early and mid-term.
Unlike most projects, INITIA's founder, Zon, has mentioned that the $INIT held by investors and the team is not only subject to a lock-up period but also cannot be staked.Non-stakable—Wow! Beautiful word, right? This means that two scenarios could occur in the early stages:
The on-chain APY is extremely high, attracting whales to purchase large amounts of $INIT to "capture" these profits, driving up the price of $INIT.
If whales are not interested in $INIT, the high APY will persist for a long time, benefiting long-term holders.(Sorry holder, I think the first one is more likely😭)
https://x.com/ItsAlwaysZonny/status/1839642332041289749
Simply put, after TGE, either the apy on the initia chain will be extremely high, or the price of $INIT will soar. I wonder if you still remember Evmos and Celestia. Especially Evmos, where the early APY was extremely high (200%+), attracting many whales to purchase EVMOS from the market to capture APY profits.However, similar to Celestia, the team and investors hold a large amount of tokens that can be staked, generating significant daily interest income. They often use this income to dump on the market, causing both the token price and APY to plummet. This is why "tokens held by investors and the team cannot be staked" is extremely important.
Additionally, another use case for $INIT is liquidity staking (similar to the pools in Osmosis). Regardless of which liquidity pool you participate in, you must pair it with $INIT. Imagine users participating in an XX/INIT liquidity pool and receiving additional ecosystem airdrops as rewards👀.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think these factors will affect the long-term price of $INIT.
I think the governance function of $INIT is also very interesting and practical, because the pledged $INIT not only protects network security, but also directly affects the core of initia - the "VIP" mechanism.
After the mainnet launch, 10% of the $INIT tokens will be allocated to the VIP reward pool. Each cycle will last two weeks, and the rewards for each cycle will be split into two reward pools: the Balance Pool and the Voting Pool.
Balance pool: Encourage initia's ecosystem to "grab" users' $INIT. The more $INIT is retained in a certain ecological project, the greater its share in this pool!
Voting pool: Voting is based on the $INIT that users stake in L1. Stakers can split their votes. For example, if you have 99 votes, you can choose to vote 30% for A, 30% for B, and 40% for C. The higher the score of the ecosystem, the higher the reward weight.
Of course, I believe these rewards will be distributed to users in the form of esINIT. (esINIT is non-transferable, and users must either maintain a VIP rating or convert esINIT for liquidity staking to unlock it.)

Therefore, after the mainnet launch, each transaction made by a user may potentially earn a reward. However, to unlock and earn more rewards, users will likely put more $INIT on-chain, participate in more activities, and align themselves with more ecosystems.The VIP mechanism will also drive ecosystem evolution. Think about it: if you don’t offer users additional rewards or provide content that is attractive enough to them, why would they be willing to leave their $INIT with you and vote for you?(So, it's likely that the rewards aren't just from staking $INIT, but also VIP rewards and additional incentives from the ecosystem side.)

So, let’s simplify it: thanks to the genius team’s design, $INIT’s utility is indeed very practical. Users buy some $INIT and then explore on the chain, and get esINIT rewards. In order to unlock and get more rewards, they will continue to participate in more ecological activities. In order to attract more users, more ecological projects will also add additional reward mechanisms. Multiple rewards attracted more new users, new users brought more funds to buy $INIT , and more development teams began to build interwoven rollups , which in turn brought more rewards.
Wow! Maybe even O'Neal's defensive fouls can't stop this flywheel from moving forward!?

If you are a secondary investor, and there is a token in front of you whose price and ecology are driven by a positive flywheel, will you miss it?
No activity yet