Founders say they want feedback.
But nobody wants to fill long forms.
So we built Audioform surveys people answer with voice instead of typing.
We're onboarding 10 beta testers this week.
If you're building something and want raw voice feedback from users, reply and I'll set you up.
Call me delusional, but the whole thesis behind Audioform:
Slightly higher friction on the response side can produce much higher confidence on the builder side.
A lot of founders are not dealing with bad feedback.
They are dealing with polite feedback.
That is more dangerous. It feels supportive, but it delays the real decision.
You want a system that surfaces friction early enough to matter.
Voice captures something text strips away: emotional certainty.
When someone speaks, you hear pause, doubt, excitement, and resistance. That is the difference between 'nice feedback' and signal you can actually build against.
Building Audioform as feedback infrastructure for people who ship in public.
The bet: higher-friction feedback can produce higher-signal decisions. We are optimizing for depth, not volume.
Most product feedback is too low-effort to trust.
A like is not a decision signal. A text reply is often performance. Builders shipping in public need to hear conviction, hesitation, and confusion, not just collect comments.
Ask people what part of your feedback loop still feels shallow.
