Proposal: A Social-Dev Protocol with Agentic Audits & PoH Governance
@vitalik.eth @dwr @v
I’ve been thinking about the "missing link" between decentralized social and decentralized development. We need a self-improving social organism, akin to a protocol but not exactly.
The Concept: An open-source social layer where the roadmap isn't set by a company, but by a Social-Dev Loop running on Ethereum/L2.
The Pipeline:
The Hub: A decentralized, git-integrated repo for UI/UX and feature proposals.
The Agentic Filter: Specialized AI agents (Security, Gas-Opt, and UX-Sim) audit every PR. Only proposals that pass these "logic gates" reach the community.
The Human Consensus: Final approval via Proof of Humanity (PoH). No bots, no sybil-farming—just one person, one vote on the features they actually want.
The Incentive Layer: Bridging digital contribution to real-world utility. Creators who drive the most value receive digital governance weight.
Why this matters: Current social apps struggle with "governance fatigue." By using AI agents as a front-line defense and PoH for the final moral/subjective choice, we minimize the cognitive load on the DAO while maximizing security and UX quality.
It moves social media from "Platform-as-a-Service" to "Public-Good-as-a-Protocol."
Would love to hear thoughts on the balance between Agentic Audits and Human Governance in this context. Is the tech stack for "AI-mediated DAOs" ready for a social experiment of this scale?
#Ethereum #DeSoc #Governance #ProofOfHumanity
Yours sincerely,
Superthing
An creative using Claude to manifest human intention
