inspired by @jtgi trying out a microblog to self own my social media
follow along with RSS 💫
(try feedreader NetNewsWire Mac/iOS)
https://mishaderidder.com/qb/
> Today we speak of European digital sovereignty as if it were a policy problem to be solved through regulation and investment. But sovereignty cannot be achieved through negation alone, by defining what we refuse. It requires an affirmative vision, a positive conception of what European technology might be. We risk being, as Bratton puts it, “technologically diverse but cosmologically monocultural”. The real challenge of technodiversity, in an age of multipolar computation, is to allow our technological stacks to be animated by different imaginaries.
https://reincantamentox.substack.com/p/drop-44-programma-101
> The question now is not whether digital art can be in the museum, but what happens when it no longer aspires to. What kinds of work emerge when collectability isn’t seen as a diminutive mode of art, but as a native condition of networked culture? @outlandhttps://outlandart.substack.com/p/after-the-art-world-part-1
“Consider a future device for individual use, which is a sort of mechanized private file and
library. It needs a name, and, to coin one at random, ‘memex’ will do. A memex is a device
in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is
mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged
intimate supplement to his memory.”
- Vannevar Bush, 1945
(from Forget Photography by Andrew Dewdney)
