The issue with mini app tokens is not the decline in their token prices, but rather the uncertainty surrounding their continued development. Mini apps have been proven to be unfeasible within the Farcaster ecosystem, and the launch of the base app seems to have confirmed its inability to attract organic consumers.
Vibe coding can be addictive, but if you're not careful, getting too caught up in coding can lead to costs that outweigh the revenue generated by the product.
Why is it necessary to send a cast when purchasing through the @bracky mini app?
I feel it could be offered as an option.
If I were replying in the comments or by mentioning @bracky , that would be great.
But having to post a cast message to buy shares in the mini app—does anyone really enjoy publicly admitting they like betting on sports?
Really hope the Farcaster team doesn't focus on optimizing the wallet while neglecting mini apps in the future.
Currently, I have to use the search button just to find a mini app I've reopened, and the experience is really poor.
Not sure if my timeline is off, but there seems to be more criticism about Zora and Base on X since the Base app launched. More people are emphasizing that content coins don't work, whether from a mechanism standpoint or based on current outcomes.
Is this another NFT hype cycle?
Optimized the project details on Buyback Direct, using $Clanker as an example, by merging buyback and price trends to assess the granularity of buybacks.
Add Key Milestones for project. I used Grok to help summarize, as its massive X query capability is a standout feature of Grok.
From the data perspective, after initiating hourly buybacks, the $Clanker trend gradually began to end its decline.
If you'd like more features, feel free to DM me.
