Antimo

sit him right next to the tired one https://x.com/oog84__/status/2032505526089621985?s=20

americanhousing.co logo goes hard af

gn https://x.com/warpcast_/status/1626031851218542592?s=20

a /red production

taps the sign https://x.com/antimoFM/status/2032085252898693396?s=20

actually laughed out loud, thanks i needed that

This is one of the fundamental reasons why I'm not an AI doomer: you can't use AI effectively if you are not able to think clearly, are confident enough to trust and express your thoughts, and can do so precisely and articulately. Moreover, since it's rare for AI to one-shot anything meaningfully (whether it's a chat response or any other generative medium), you'll also need a good amount of patience, planning, self-criticism and emotional control; mental stamina, broadly speaking. A comparison I've often noticed is the similarity between managing other people and managing AI. None of these are widespread skills. But all of these are uniquely human skills. Some of us understand this implicitly; those who don't, either because they don't have the skills I'm talking about (whether they're aware of it or not) or because they're not willing to work on improving themselves, will reject AI. They will do it in different degrees and for a number of stated reasons. At the same time, they will benefit from the (low-hanging) fruits of AI-driven possibilities. So in the end, even if it might be true that AI will "change everything" much more than the Internet or smartphones or computers ever did, nothing will change at the same time: most people will just learn to be content with the course of least resistance and complain about it. TL;DR skill issue https://x.com/rauchg/status/2031762505392140472?s=20

New domain https://slash.red

I've been keeping a running list of AI design tools I've used / want to try, might actually start doing this on livestream

gm just had an amazing bbq squirrel sandwich

i remember reading that thanks to the internet, the average person read much more than they would otherwise that struck me as counterintuitive and optimistic now that it's markdown all the way down, I look forward to spend more of my time writing longhand, then dictate it to my agent and watch it turn into magic gg

Before our first child was born ~5 years ago, I started reading one history book per world country (A → Z); got as far as The Bahamas then basically stopped reading Got back on the horse with this pair, which is a break from strict alphabetical reading but it's actually background reading for Bangladesh (which is where my father is from) I settled on this two with some GPT help, which was great because finding history books actually worth reading and not just one damn fact after another is not easy The first one is also a signed copy which I didn't realise (I always buy secondhand whenever I can, as old as my budget allows) and was a nice surprise

new pinterest just dropped https://x.com/0x_ultra/status/2029205082835960274?s=46

and @jesus saw every thing that /red had made, and it was good

run it back @runonbase.eth

The one where the gang learns about tabular figures https://x.com/sorenblank/status/2028520200417706017?s=46

Here's the thing As a self-taught freelance designer, the design process as they describe it is something I've read about, but I never had the luxury of doing little diverge / converge / diverge post-it sessions My experience of design is that clients want it tomorrow, ideally today; my design process is receive task > complete task (as efficiently as possible) Design operators and startups have always operated at max efficiency, using the latest tools, cutting down on process wherever they could What they describe as "the design process" was basically a ZIRP phenomenon, corporate bloat meant to justify headcount. Sure, it wasn't all theatre: engineering was OOMs more complex and expensive, so mockups and research had their place, to an extent The old world begun dying in 1990 when Photoshop came out; maybe not overnight, but 2005-2025 was mostly a farce What's happening is simply that incumbents have to move as fast as startups if they want to be competitive (ie if they want to survive), which means streamlining process, which means downsizing, which means dropping the ceremony Everybody has to hustle now, but it's nothing now to us, we've been hustlince since https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eh8bcBIAAFo&t=9s

You might have noticed the Cast button is back in its rightful place (gg @arpita-205); the bottom-right corner was the obvious solve, but I still wanted to try other options I made this simple Lovable prototype as a test environment Link in next cast if you want to bounce it around

@neynar idk what / who inversebrah is and and at this point i'm too afraid to ask

agentic capital markets ui for flow.bid