Deep Tide TechFlow | February 27, 2025, 8:00 AM

Aptos chose the safe path, while Sui redesigned the Move programming language to make it more suitable for large-scale user adoption.

Written by Angelo.sui

Compiled by Deep Tide TechFlow

Sui vs Aptos: The Ultimate Showdown of the Move Blockchain

Two blockchains, both originating from Meta's Diem project, but with fundamentally different goals and technological paths. Only one is truly designed for large-scale user adoption.

Who will win out between Sui and Aptos?

Core Difference: Execution Model

On the surface, Sui and Aptos share many similarities:

Both are developed based on the Move programming language;

Both promise to provide high scalability;

Both aim for large-scale Web3 applications.

However, their transaction processing methods are completely different, which is the key to SUI's victory.

The Battle of the MOVE Public Chains: Sui is Outpacing Aptos

Parallel Execution vs Sequential Execution

Sui: Adopts a true parallel execution model, meaning it can process thousands of transactions simultaneously, avoiding network congestion.

Aptos: Uses Block-STM technology, which attempts to achieve parallel processing but still requires sequential validation of transactions, subtly slowing down the overall processing speed.

Thus, $SUI is designed for speed from the ground up, while $APT still relies on traditional transaction sorting mechanisms.

Sui's Bottleneck-Free Design

During transaction execution, Aptos relies on packaging transactions into blocks, a mechanism that can easily form performance bottlenecks.

In contrast, $SUI completely abandons the concept of global sorting, allowing transactions without interactive relationships to execute independently.

No bottlenecks, no unnecessary delays, just faster speeds.

Sui is Smarter. $SUI introduces a dynamic Gas pricing mechanism, which means users don't have to pay high fees to compete for priority transaction rights.

Meanwhile, $APT follows the traditional Gas model, where users need to pay higher fees to ensure transaction priority when the network is congested.

Sui's Move Programming Language Has the Edge. Although both Sui and Aptos are based on Move, $SUI has deeply customized Move to become an object-based model. This improvement brings the following advantages:

More intuitive for developers, reducing the learning curve;

Enhanced execution efficiency of smart contracts;

A design that emphasizes security, reducing the risk of vulnerabilities.

In contrast, Aptos still uses the original version of Move, lacking targeted optimization, giving Sui the upper hand in usability.

NFT and Gaming Sector

For NFT and gaming scenarios, speed, low cost, and high throughput are core requirements.

Sui's object-centric model enables instant asset ownership changes without complex smart contract logic.

On Aptos, each asset transfer requires more on-chain computation, making NFT interactions slower and more costly.

Therefore, in the NFT and gaming sector, $SUI's technical design is more aligned with actual needs.

The Battle of the MOVE Public Chains: Sui is Outpacing Aptos

Ecosystem: The Organic Growth of $SUI

While $APT experienced rapid growth at launch thanks to strong venture capital support, its user adoption rate is slowing down.

In contrast, $SUI's growth is more natural, mainly due to the following aspects:

Games and NFT projects are more inclined to choose Sui over Aptos;

The adoption rate of DeFi ecosystems is steadily increasing;

Developer activity has significantly increased, and the ecosystem continues to expand.

Real applications trump venture capital hype, which is the key to $SUI's sustainable development.

The Battle of the MOVE Public Chains: Sui is Outpacing Aptos

Source: @DefiLlama

Network Activity: $SUI's Comprehensive Lead

Although $APT had a higher market cap in the early days, $SUI has surpassed it in core metrics such as daily trading volume and user engagement:

Has a larger number of real users;

Attracted more developers;

More active network activity.

The data speaks for itself; $SUI's performance demonstrates its strong potential in real-world applications.

The Battle of the MOVE Public Chains: Sui is Outpacing Aptos

Source: @Torero_Romero

Innovation vs Imitation

Sui is not just another blockchain based on Move; it has achieved a qualitative leap in design:

Horizontal scaling: Supports unlimited growth to meet future large-scale demands;

Natively supports gaming and high-frequency trading: Provides the best support for high-performance scenarios;

Optimized fee structure and user experience: Makes it easy for users and developers to participate.

Aptos, on the other hand, has chosen a more conservative path, still relying on traditional L1 mechanisms, with only some functions optimized.

Conclusion: Sui is the Future of Blockchain

Aptos chose the safe route, while Sui redesigned the Move programming language to make it more suitable for large-scale user adoption.

If you focus on the following key points:

Speed and scalability: Sui is the winner;

Sustainable Gas fees: Sui has the edge;

Gaming and NFT applications: Sui has the advantage;

Genuine ecosystem growth: Sui shines brighter.

While $APT performs well, $SUI's architecture and design are fundamentally different, with stronger potential.

Don't Underestimate Sui's Potential

While the market is still debating transaction per second (TPS) figures, $SUI has already taken the lead in multiple aspects:

Daily trading volume has surpassed @Aptos;

Attracted more top developers and quality projects;

Fully demonstrated the potential of the Move programming language, far exceeding expectations.

Currently, the market has not fully realized Sui's true value.

The Battle of the MOVE Public Chains: Sui is Outpacing Aptos

Key Question: How Do You Choose?

Are you still clinging to Aptos's narrative, or have you turned your gaze to true technological innovation?

$SUI is the most advanced blockchain based on Move, and it won't be long before more people recognize this fact.

Deep Tide TechFlow | February 27, 2025, 8:00 AM

Aptos chose the safe path, while Sui redesigned the Move programming language to make it more suitable for large-scale user adoption.

Written by Angelo.sui

Compiled by Deep Tide TechFlow

Sui vs Aptos: The Ultimate Showdown of the Move Blockchain

Two blockchains, both originating from Meta's Diem project, but with fundamentally different goals and technological paths. Only one is truly designed for large-scale user adoption.

Who will win out between Sui and Aptos?

Core Difference: Execution Model

On the surface, Sui and Aptos share many similarities:

Both are developed based on the Move programming language;

Both promise to provide high scalability;

Both aim for large-scale Web3 applications.

However, their transaction processing methods are completely different, which is the key to SUI's victory.

The Battle of the MOVE Public Chains: Sui is Outpacing Aptos

Parallel Execution vs Sequential Execution

Sui: Adopts a true parallel execution model, meaning it can process thousands of transactions simultaneously, avoiding network congestion.

Aptos: Uses Block-STM technology, which attempts to achieve parallel processing but still requires sequential validation of transactions, subtly slowing down the overall processing speed.

Thus, $SUI is designed for speed from the ground up, while $APT still relies on traditional transaction sorting mechanisms.

Sui's Bottleneck-Free Design

During transaction execution, Aptos relies on packaging transactions into blocks, a mechanism that can easily form performance bottlenecks.

In contrast, $SUI completely abandons the concept of global sorting, allowing transactions without interactive relationships to execute independently.

No bottlenecks, no unnecessary delays, just faster speeds.

Sui is Smarter. $SUI introduces a dynamic Gas pricing mechanism, which means users don't have to pay high fees to compete for priority transaction rights.

Meanwhile, $APT follows the traditional Gas model, where users need to pay higher fees to ensure transaction priority when the network is congested.

Sui's Move Programming Language Has the Edge. Although both Sui and Aptos are based on Move, $SUI has deeply customized Move to become an object-based model. This improvement brings the following advantages:

More intuitive for developers, reducing the learning curve;

Enhanced execution efficiency of smart contracts;

A design that emphasizes security, reducing the risk of vulnerabilities.

In contrast, Aptos still uses the original version of Move, lacking targeted optimization, giving Sui the upper hand in usability.

NFT and Gaming Sector

For NFT and gaming scenarios, speed, low cost, and high throughput are core requirements.

Sui's object-centric model enables instant asset ownership changes without complex smart contract logic.

On Aptos, each asset transfer requires more on-chain computation, making NFT interactions slower and more costly.

Therefore, in the NFT and gaming sector, $SUI's technical design is more aligned with actual needs.

The Battle of the MOVE Public Chains: Sui is Outpacing Aptos

Ecosystem: The Organic Growth of $SUI

While $APT experienced rapid growth at launch thanks to strong venture capital support, its user adoption rate is slowing down.

In contrast, $SUI's growth is more natural, mainly due to the following aspects:

Games and NFT projects are more inclined to choose Sui over Aptos;

The adoption rate of DeFi ecosystems is steadily increasing;

Developer activity has significantly increased, and the ecosystem continues to expand.

Real applications trump venture capital hype, which is the key to $SUI's sustainable development.

The Battle of the MOVE Public Chains: Sui is Outpacing Aptos

Source: @DefiLlama

Network Activity: $SUI's Comprehensive Lead

Although $APT had a higher market cap in the early days, $SUI has surpassed it in core metrics such as daily trading volume and user engagement:

Has a larger number of real users;

Attracted more developers;

More active network activity.

The data speaks for itself; $SUI's performance demonstrates its strong potential in real-world applications.

The Battle of the MOVE Public Chains: Sui is Outpacing Aptos

Source: @Torero_Romero

Innovation vs Imitation

Sui is not just another blockchain based on Move; it has achieved a qualitative leap in design:

Horizontal scaling: Supports unlimited growth to meet future large-scale demands;

Natively supports gaming and high-frequency trading: Provides the best support for high-performance scenarios;

Optimized fee structure and user experience: Makes it easy for users and developers to participate.

Aptos, on the other hand, has chosen a more conservative path, still relying on traditional L1 mechanisms, with only some functions optimized.

Conclusion: Sui is the Future of Blockchain

Aptos chose the safe route, while Sui redesigned the Move programming language to make it more suitable for large-scale user adoption.

If you focus on the following key points:

Speed and scalability: Sui is the winner;

Sustainable Gas fees: Sui has the edge;

Gaming and NFT applications: Sui has the advantage;

Genuine ecosystem growth: Sui shines brighter.

While $APT performs well, $SUI's architecture and design are fundamentally different, with stronger potential.

Don't Underestimate Sui's Potential

While the market is still debating transaction per second (TPS) figures, $SUI has already taken the lead in multiple aspects:

Daily trading volume has surpassed @Aptos;

Attracted more top developers and quality projects;

Fully demonstrated the potential of the Move programming language, far exceeding expectations.

Currently, the market has not fully realized Sui's true value.

The Battle of the MOVE Public Chains: Sui is Outpacing Aptos

Key Question: How Do You Choose?

Are you still clinging to Aptos's narrative, or have you turned your gaze to true technological innovation?

$SUI is the most advanced blockchain based on Move, and it won't be long before more people recognize this fact.