<100 subscribers

Share Dialog

Share Dialog

L3 + Chain Abstraction + Token Flywheel: Dissecting the Triple Engine of the New Gaming Darling B3

L3 + Chain Abstraction + Token Flywheel: Dissecting the Triple Engine of the New Gaming Darling B3

To put it simply, B3 is in the business of game operations, not infrastructure construction.

However, the L3 track is highly competitive. While you have the Base ecosystem, others have Arbitrum's Orbit and Polygon's CDK. B3's differentiated moat may lie in its deep understanding of gaming scenarios and unified entry points, such as BSMNT.fun (please note that I encountered some issues while trying to parse this link. The problem might be related to the link itself or the network. If you need the content of this webpage, please check the validity of the link and try again).

Tokenomics Design and Business Model

B3's token allocation is relatively balanced: 34.2% is allocated to the community ecosystem, with only 19% released at TGE (Token Generation Event), and the remaining portion is locked for four years to avoid short-term selling pressure.

The use cases for $B3 include staking to earn GameChains rewards, funding game projects, and paying transaction fees, forming a relatively complete logic.

From a business model perspective, B3 adopts a "platform economy + network effect" model. Unlike traditional game publishers that take a 30-70% cut, B3 attracts ecosystem participants through a lower transaction fee rate (0.5%) and token incentives.

The key value flywheel is: more games on board → more players gathering → stronger network effect → higher demand for $B3 → more resources invested in the ecosystem.

What I'm particularly concerned about is B3's positioning as the "main circulating token of the full-chain gaming ecosystem." Most chain games currently have their own token economies. How can B3 convince these projects to accept $B3 as a universal currency? From a valuation perspective, B3 resembles a "gaming version of the App Store," with value derived not only from technical fees but also from the scale effect of the ecosystem.

Conclusion

The biggest highlight of the B3 project is not technological innovation but its systematic attempt to solve the structural problems of the Web3 gaming industry. In terms of team background and resource integration capabilities, the Coinbase-affiliated team, Base ecosystem support, and $21 million in funding are all solid advantages. With 6 million active wallet users, over 80 integrated games, and 300 million cumulative transactions, B3 has indeed proven its capabilities in user acquisition and ecosystem building.

B3's differentiation lies in its middle path, which "does not rely entirely on a single game IP and is not purely a technical infrastructure." In theory, this approach offers more room for imagination, but it also faces the risk of being "neither fish nor fowl."

Of course, the Web3 gaming track is still in its early exploratory stage. Whether B3 can truly realize its vision of "open gaming" depends on its ability to continuously attract high-quality game content and real users. After all, no matter how good the infrastructure is, its value ultimately depends on the prosperity of the application ecosystem.

To put it simply, B3 is in the business of game operations, not infrastructure construction.

However, the L3 track is highly competitive. While you have the Base ecosystem, others have Arbitrum's Orbit and Polygon's CDK. B3's differentiated moat may lie in its deep understanding of gaming scenarios and unified entry points, such as BSMNT.fun (please note that I encountered some issues while trying to parse this link. The problem might be related to the link itself or the network. If you need the content of this webpage, please check the validity of the link and try again).

Tokenomics Design and Business Model

B3's token allocation is relatively balanced: 34.2% is allocated to the community ecosystem, with only 19% released at TGE (Token Generation Event), and the remaining portion is locked for four years to avoid short-term selling pressure.

The use cases for $B3 include staking to earn GameChains rewards, funding game projects, and paying transaction fees, forming a relatively complete logic.

From a business model perspective, B3 adopts a "platform economy + network effect" model. Unlike traditional game publishers that take a 30-70% cut, B3 attracts ecosystem participants through a lower transaction fee rate (0.5%) and token incentives.

The key value flywheel is: more games on board → more players gathering → stronger network effect → higher demand for $B3 → more resources invested in the ecosystem.

What I'm particularly concerned about is B3's positioning as the "main circulating token of the full-chain gaming ecosystem." Most chain games currently have their own token economies. How can B3 convince these projects to accept $B3 as a universal currency? From a valuation perspective, B3 resembles a "gaming version of the App Store," with value derived not only from technical fees but also from the scale effect of the ecosystem.

Conclusion

The biggest highlight of the B3 project is not technological innovation but its systematic attempt to solve the structural problems of the Web3 gaming industry. In terms of team background and resource integration capabilities, the Coinbase-affiliated team, Base ecosystem support, and $21 million in funding are all solid advantages. With 6 million active wallet users, over 80 integrated games, and 300 million cumulative transactions, B3 has indeed proven its capabilities in user acquisition and ecosystem building.

B3's differentiation lies in its middle path, which "does not rely entirely on a single game IP and is not purely a technical infrastructure." In theory, this approach offers more room for imagination, but it also faces the risk of being "neither fish nor fowl."

Of course, the Web3 gaming track is still in its early exploratory stage. Whether B3 can truly realize its vision of "open gaming" depends on its ability to continuously attract high-quality game content and real users. After all, no matter how good the infrastructure is, its value ultimately depends on the prosperity of the application ecosystem.