Uniswap's Major Buyback Proposal: Can UNI Trigger a Value Reassessment?
Uniswap’s latest governance proposal aims to transition the UNI token into a deflationary model by activating protocol fees and implementing a buyback-and-burn mechanism. These changes could profoundly impact UNI’s long-term value. Core Proposal HighlightsEnable protocol fees and use them to repurchase and burn UNI tokens, transforming UNI from a governance token into a productive asset backed by cash flow.Conduct a one-time burn of 100 million UNI tokens (16% of total supply), immediately bo...
Is Polymarket Considered Gambling? Legal Risks for Chinese Users
Polymarket is a blockchain-based prediction market platform that allows users to predict future events and profit by buying and selling related contract shares. This article analyzes the risks for Chinese users from a legal perspective: * How Polymarket Works: Users use stablecoins to bet on outcomes of future events like politics or sports, trading shares that represent the probability of a particular outcome. Settlements are executed via smart contracts once the event outcome is determined....
Can Stablecoins Break Visa and Mastercard's Duopoly?
Stablecoins have emerged as a potential challenger to the $1 trillion duopoly of Visa and Mastercard. These stablecoins offer the promise of significantly lower transaction fees, which could disrupt the current market dynamics dominated by Visa and Mastercard. However, the path to widespread adoption is fraught with regulatory and banking industry pressures.The Current LandscapeVisa and Mastercard currently charge merchants transaction fees of up to 2-3%, which is often the second-largest exp...
Support Scarlett
Bitcoin’s Next Hurdle: Wall Street Wants the Asset, but the Network Is Half-Asleep
<100 subscribers
Support Scarlett
Bitcoin’s Next Hurdle: Wall Street Wants the Asset, but the Network Is Half-Asleep
Uniswap's Major Buyback Proposal: Can UNI Trigger a Value Reassessment?
Uniswap’s latest governance proposal aims to transition the UNI token into a deflationary model by activating protocol fees and implementing a buyback-and-burn mechanism. These changes could profoundly impact UNI’s long-term value. Core Proposal HighlightsEnable protocol fees and use them to repurchase and burn UNI tokens, transforming UNI from a governance token into a productive asset backed by cash flow.Conduct a one-time burn of 100 million UNI tokens (16% of total supply), immediately bo...
Is Polymarket Considered Gambling? Legal Risks for Chinese Users
Polymarket is a blockchain-based prediction market platform that allows users to predict future events and profit by buying and selling related contract shares. This article analyzes the risks for Chinese users from a legal perspective: * How Polymarket Works: Users use stablecoins to bet on outcomes of future events like politics or sports, trading shares that represent the probability of a particular outcome. Settlements are executed via smart contracts once the event outcome is determined....
Can Stablecoins Break Visa and Mastercard's Duopoly?
Stablecoins have emerged as a potential challenger to the $1 trillion duopoly of Visa and Mastercard. These stablecoins offer the promise of significantly lower transaction fees, which could disrupt the current market dynamics dominated by Visa and Mastercard. However, the path to widespread adoption is fraught with regulatory and banking industry pressures.The Current LandscapeVisa and Mastercard currently charge merchants transaction fees of up to 2-3%, which is often the second-largest exp...
Spot Demand Is Rocketing
Twelve U.S. spot-BTC ETFs now hold >1 million BTC—5 % of supply—while Strategy (NASDAQ: MSTR) sits on 628 k BTC, only 100 k less than BlackRock’s IBIT. ETFs give pensions a one-click allocation; Strategy offers a leveraged, convertible-bond turbo-charge. Both vehicles are vacuuming coins off the market and concentrating custody in a handful of Wall Street custodians.
But Block-Space Demand Is Flat
Price is flirting with $125 k, yet blocks are only 60–70 % full and the mean fee is <$0.50. Halving-4 (April 2024) slashed the subsidy to 3.125 BTC, so fees now supply <1 % of miner revenue. Halving-5 in 2028 will drop the reward to 1.5625 BTC—leaving security budgets almost entirely dependent on transaction fees that barely exist.
Miner Economics Are Breaking
Foundry USA still commands ~30 % of hashrate, Antpool ~18 %, and difficulty is at an all-time high—yet individual miners are selling every sat they mine just to cover power. If fees do not rise, marginal hash will unplug, hashrate will centralise further, and the cost to attack the chain falls in real terms.
Wrapped & Native Yield Experiments
BitGo’s wBTC dominance is eroding as Coinbase’s cbBTC has ballooned to 52 k BTC in eight months. Meanwhile Babylon’s native staking lets users lock BTC to secure external PoS chains; the launch day in Aug-2024 pushed median fees above $150 for a single block—then activity collapsed. These flashes show the network can monetise block-space, but only while the novelty lasts.
Digital-Gold Narrative vs. Security Reality
“Store-of-value” buyers park coins in ETFs or Strategy shares and never move them on-chain. That is bullish for price but bearish for fee revenue. If the trend continues, Bitcoin becomes a $2 trillion vault guarded by an ever-thinner army of miners whose paychecks shrink every 210 000 blocks.
What Has to Happen
Sustained native applications—staking, roll-ups, ordinals, payment pools—that generate recurring fee pressure.
A cultural pivot: holders must view using the chain, not just hoarding the coin, as part of the investment thesis.
Spot Demand Is Rocketing
Twelve U.S. spot-BTC ETFs now hold >1 million BTC—5 % of supply—while Strategy (NASDAQ: MSTR) sits on 628 k BTC, only 100 k less than BlackRock’s IBIT. ETFs give pensions a one-click allocation; Strategy offers a leveraged, convertible-bond turbo-charge. Both vehicles are vacuuming coins off the market and concentrating custody in a handful of Wall Street custodians.
But Block-Space Demand Is Flat
Price is flirting with $125 k, yet blocks are only 60–70 % full and the mean fee is <$0.50. Halving-4 (April 2024) slashed the subsidy to 3.125 BTC, so fees now supply <1 % of miner revenue. Halving-5 in 2028 will drop the reward to 1.5625 BTC—leaving security budgets almost entirely dependent on transaction fees that barely exist.
Miner Economics Are Breaking
Foundry USA still commands ~30 % of hashrate, Antpool ~18 %, and difficulty is at an all-time high—yet individual miners are selling every sat they mine just to cover power. If fees do not rise, marginal hash will unplug, hashrate will centralise further, and the cost to attack the chain falls in real terms.
Wrapped & Native Yield Experiments
BitGo’s wBTC dominance is eroding as Coinbase’s cbBTC has ballooned to 52 k BTC in eight months. Meanwhile Babylon’s native staking lets users lock BTC to secure external PoS chains; the launch day in Aug-2024 pushed median fees above $150 for a single block—then activity collapsed. These flashes show the network can monetise block-space, but only while the novelty lasts.
Digital-Gold Narrative vs. Security Reality
“Store-of-value” buyers park coins in ETFs or Strategy shares and never move them on-chain. That is bullish for price but bearish for fee revenue. If the trend continues, Bitcoin becomes a $2 trillion vault guarded by an ever-thinner army of miners whose paychecks shrink every 210 000 blocks.
What Has to Happen
Sustained native applications—staking, roll-ups, ordinals, payment pools—that generate recurring fee pressure.
A cultural pivot: holders must view using the chain, not just hoarding the coin, as part of the investment thesis.
Wallet UX that abstracts fees so newcomers don’t flinch at $5–$10 transfers when the time comes.
Bottom Line
Wall Street’s hunger for BTC exposure has never been stronger, yet the chain that backs the asset is drifting toward a fee desert. Unless new use-cases refill the mempool, the next halving won’t just cut issuance—it could hollow out the very security budget that makes “digital gold” safe to own.
Wallet UX that abstracts fees so newcomers don’t flinch at $5–$10 transfers when the time comes.
Bottom Line
Wall Street’s hunger for BTC exposure has never been stronger, yet the chain that backs the asset is drifting toward a fee desert. Unless new use-cases refill the mempool, the next halving won’t just cut issuance—it could hollow out the very security budget that makes “digital gold” safe to own.
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
No comments yet