I believe Socrates said, "virtue is wisdom." If a person often thinks about some big problems in the world and life, he will be more detached from the interests of the secular world and is unlikely to do those harmful things. In the final analysis, moral corruption is a kind of ignorance. Of course, this is not the same as the level of education. Some people with more literacy are also ignorant. Character is not only good or bad, but also different in depth two Where do false, evil and ugly come from? Why are people hypocritical, vicious and ugly? I only found one answer: because of greed. Why do people have greed? Buddhism has a very correct answer to this: because of "ignorance". Generally speaking, there is no wisdom and lack of a thorough understanding of life. Therefore, it is life wisdom, not ideology, that really determines moral quality. It is at least superficial to attribute the reason of moral decline to the out of control of ideology and try to straighten out the world and people by strengthening ideology. three When evaluating people, talent and character are the two most commonly used criteria. Of course, the two can be separated, but at the deepest level, are they interlinked? For example, can we say that great talent is also virtue, great virtue is also talent, and genius and saints are the same manifestation of divinity? For another example, is virtue without talent necessarily hypocritical, that is, virtue without virtue? Is talent without virtue necessarily shallow, that is, non talent? Of course, this statement has implied a reinterpretation of talent and virtue. I tend to regard them as different forms of wisdom. four Character is not only good or bad, but also wide, narrow and deep. Good or bad is quality, width and depth are not necessarily quantity. It is reasonable for the ancients to call the inferior as "villains" and "people fighting against Shaws". Many evil deeds are out of shallow nature and narrow judgment. five Knowledge is a tool, not good or evil. Knowledge can be good or evil. Virtue has little to do with knowledge. The real source of virtue is wisdom, that is, an open consciousness of life. If virtue does not flow out of wisdom, but is created by self-cultivation alone, it is at least blind, and is likely to be utilitarian and hypocritical. six Wherever a perfect gentleman appears, the people there will suffer, because he must torture and judge you with his perfection. This kind of good people, maybe you really can't say what obvious shortcomings he has, although you can't say what decent advantages he has except his morality. On the contrary, a real person, a unique personality, must have prominent advantages and disadvantages, exposed in front of people without moral hypocrisy, which is his morality.

I believe Socrates said, "virtue is wisdom." If a person often thinks about some big problems in the world and life, he will be more detached from the interests of the secular world and is unlikely to do those harmful things. In the final analysis, moral corruption is a kind of ignorance. Of course, this is not the same as the level of education. Some people with more literacy are also ignorant. Character is not only good or bad, but also different in depth two Where do false, evil and ugly come from? Why are people hypocritical, vicious and ugly? I only found one answer: because of greed. Why do people have greed? Buddhism has a very correct answer to this: because of "ignorance". Generally speaking, there is no wisdom and lack of a thorough understanding of life. Therefore, it is life wisdom, not ideology, that really determines moral quality. It is at least superficial to attribute the reason of moral decline to the out of control of ideology and try to straighten out the world and people by strengthening ideology. three When evaluating people, talent and character are the two most commonly used criteria. Of course, the two can be separated, but at the deepest level, are they interlinked? For example, can we say that great talent is also virtue, great virtue is also talent, and genius and saints are the same manifestation of divinity? For another example, is virtue without talent necessarily hypocritical, that is, virtue without virtue? Is talent without virtue necessarily shallow, that is, non talent? Of course, this statement has implied a reinterpretation of talent and virtue. I tend to regard them as different forms of wisdom. four Character is not only good or bad, but also wide, narrow and deep. Good or bad is quality, width and depth are not necessarily quantity. It is reasonable for the ancients to call the inferior as "villains" and "people fighting against Shaws". Many evil deeds are out of shallow nature and narrow judgment. five Knowledge is a tool, not good or evil. Knowledge can be good or evil. Virtue has little to do with knowledge. The real source of virtue is wisdom, that is, an open consciousness of life. If virtue does not flow out of wisdom, but is created by self-cultivation alone, it is at least blind, and is likely to be utilitarian and hypocritical. six Wherever a perfect gentleman appears, the people there will suffer, because he must torture and judge you with his perfection. This kind of good people, maybe you really can't say what obvious shortcomings he has, although you can't say what decent advantages he has except his morality. On the contrary, a real person, a unique personality, must have prominent advantages and disadvantages, exposed in front of people without moral hypocrisy, which is his morality.