#Bitcoin #Crypto #HousingMarket

Imagine this: you no longer need to save for years, borrow from your family, or sell your Bitcoin to buy a house. All you need to do is use your BTC as collateral — and you can take out a mortgage directly. Sounds like science fiction? But this is precisely the real-world plan the U.S. is now actively exploring — bringing Bitcoin formally into the mortgage system.

At the end of June, the U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) announced that it would require Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — two financial giants that control half of the U.S. mortgage market — to begin studying how to incorporate crypto assets, particularly Bitcoin, into the mortgage underwriting framework.

This change isn’t just about the crypto world — it could potentially rewrite the rules of the entire U.S. housing finance market. And behind it all is a heavyweight figure who understands both real estate and Bitcoin: the new FHFA Director, Bill Pulte, who is now attempting to reform a $6.6 trillion market.

“In 2012, it took 30,000 Bitcoins to buy a house. Now, you only need 5.” That’s a line from a Coinbase ad. But the next step might be that you don’t even need to sell those 5 Bitcoins to get a house. This isn’t a distant vision — it’s a reality just around the corner.

But that also raises the question: can crypto assets really support half of America’s housing finance system?

The key figure in this story is current FHFA Director William J. Pulte. If you’re familiar with the U.S. real estate world, that last name should ring a bell — Pulte is the grandson of the founder of PulteGroup, the third-largest homebuilding company in the U.S. In other words, he’s both old-money real estate and an early believer in crypto.

After taking office, Pulte acted swiftly. First, he cleaned house at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, installing himself as chairman of the board. Then, in alignment with Trump’s policy direction, he introduced a crypto vision into housing finance: “Make America the global capital of crypto.”

His “Resolution 2025–360” explicitly mandates that Fannie and Freddie must consider crypto assets as part of mortgage applicants’ reserve asset evaluations — and without requiring conversion to U.S. dollars.

What does that mean? Previously, if you wanted to use Bitcoin to apply for a mortgage, you had to first sell it, convert it to USD, and deposit it into a bank account — only after 60 days would it count as “legal reserves.” Now, it’s possible you’ll simply need a proof of asset from Coinbase or Gemini, and you could directly qualify for a mortgage.

From a technical perspective, this isn’t hard. But from a regulatory standpoint, it’s a massive paradigm shift.

Put simply, the U.S. housing finance market is just too massive — so massive that no asset class can afford to ignore its structural importance. According to JPMorgan, by the end of 2024, Fannie and Freddie together guarantee $6.6 trillion worth of mortgage-backed securities (MBS), covering over half of all U.S. mortgages.

Meanwhile, young Americans are being shut out by high home prices and rising interest rates. According to data from Redfin and Security.org, over half of Gen Z and Millennials have owned or currently hold crypto assets — and many bought their first home by selling crypto.

This group isn’t saving through wages, nor are they getting cash from rich parents — but they might hold BTC or ETH that surged during the bull run. Their wealth isn’t in banks; it’s on the blockchain. And under traditional finance standards, such assets can’t be evaluated — rendering them invisible to mortgage systems.

Incorporating crypto into mortgage evaluations is essentially about bringing this previously “credit-invisible” population into institutional view. It not only increases market participation but fundamentally expands the definition of acceptable collateral.

This may be the least visible — but most far-reaching — part of this policy shift. Let’s imagine a typical case:

• You bought $50,000 worth of BTC in 2017;

• By 2025, that BTC is worth $500,000;

• If you sell it, you’ll owe $90,000 in capital gains tax before you can use the money to buy a house;

• But now, you can instead collateralize $300,000 worth of BTC, get a mortgage at 9% interest — skip the taxes, and still retain Bitcoin’s upside potential.

That’s the “win-win” scenario of crypto mortgages: unlocking liquidity, avoiding taxable events, increasing buying power, and still holding onto asset appreciation.

Some platforms — like Milo Credit, People’s Reserve, and Moon Mortgage — already offer such services, with interest rates as low as 3.5% (with LTV capped at ~33%). A $300,000 crypto-backed mortgage, once policy-backed, could save $20,000–30,000 annually in interest versus a traditional mortgage — and completely bypass capital gains taxes on selling BTC.

If this model is adopted by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and other mainstream institutions, it could enable securitization and true liquidity injection — pushing crypto mortgages into the heart of the financial system.

Risks certainly exist. From former SEC official Corey Frayer to academic Hilary Allen, many have warned that using highly volatile crypto as mortgage collateral could pose systemic risks during sharp market corrections.

They’re not wrong. You can’t count on BTC rising 50% every year. What if borrowers get liquidated? How do lenders minimize losses? How does the system handle liquidity stress?To address these concerns, FHFA has proposed several “safety mechanisms”:

• Only accept crypto assets issued on U.S.-regulated centralized exchanges;

• Require risk buffer ratios to be set by Fannie and Freddie;

• All changes must be reviewed and approved by the board and FHFA.

In short, this isn’t an open floodgate — it’s a tightly regulated experiment with safety rails in place.

We’re witnessing an unprecedented turning point:

• Bitcoin is shifting from a digital currency to a recognized form of collateral;

• The mortgage market is evolving from income-based models to asset-based models;

• Government-Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) are gradually marketizing;

• Homeownership is transitioning from selling crypto to buy a house — to collateralizing crypto while keeping it.

The intersection of all these changes is precisely where the Bitcoin mortgage mechanism is rising. It may not replace traditional housing finance — but it will become a powerful complementary force. It bridges on-chain and off-chain assets, connects Gen Z to the legacy financial system, and provides a practical path for blending decentralized assets with federal-level credit instruments.

Every technological revolution begins with both doubt and passion.

Bitcoin-backed mortgages represent a gentle challenge to traditional financial rules. They may enable tax optimization, interest rate competition, and credit expansion — or trigger valuation confusion, volatility spillovers, and regulatory gaps.

But one thing is clear: what’s being unlocked isn’t just the liquidity of digital assets — it’s a new trust mechanism: Assets don’t have to sit in banks. Value doesn’t have to be defined by dollars.

When Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac truly begin incorporating Bitcoin into their risk models, the U.S. housing finance system may be entering a brand-new chapter.And the crypto world — at long last — will have found its real foothold in the off-chain world.

#Bitcoin #Crypto #HousingMarket

Imagine this: you no longer need to save for years, borrow from your family, or sell your Bitcoin to buy a house. All you need to do is use your BTC as collateral — and you can take out a mortgage directly. Sounds like science fiction? But this is precisely the real-world plan the U.S. is now actively exploring — bringing Bitcoin formally into the mortgage system.

At the end of June, the U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) announced that it would require Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — two financial giants that control half of the U.S. mortgage market — to begin studying how to incorporate crypto assets, particularly Bitcoin, into the mortgage underwriting framework.

This change isn’t just about the crypto world — it could potentially rewrite the rules of the entire U.S. housing finance market. And behind it all is a heavyweight figure who understands both real estate and Bitcoin: the new FHFA Director, Bill Pulte, who is now attempting to reform a $6.6 trillion market.

“In 2012, it took 30,000 Bitcoins to buy a house. Now, you only need 5.” That’s a line from a Coinbase ad. But the next step might be that you don’t even need to sell those 5 Bitcoins to get a house. This isn’t a distant vision — it’s a reality just around the corner.

But that also raises the question: can crypto assets really support half of America’s housing finance system?

The key figure in this story is current FHFA Director William J. Pulte. If you’re familiar with the U.S. real estate world, that last name should ring a bell — Pulte is the grandson of the founder of PulteGroup, the third-largest homebuilding company in the U.S. In other words, he’s both old-money real estate and an early believer in crypto.

After taking office, Pulte acted swiftly. First, he cleaned house at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, installing himself as chairman of the board. Then, in alignment with Trump’s policy direction, he introduced a crypto vision into housing finance: “Make America the global capital of crypto.”

His “Resolution 2025–360” explicitly mandates that Fannie and Freddie must consider crypto assets as part of mortgage applicants’ reserve asset evaluations — and without requiring conversion to U.S. dollars.

What does that mean? Previously, if you wanted to use Bitcoin to apply for a mortgage, you had to first sell it, convert it to USD, and deposit it into a bank account — only after 60 days would it count as “legal reserves.” Now, it’s possible you’ll simply need a proof of asset from Coinbase or Gemini, and you could directly qualify for a mortgage.

From a technical perspective, this isn’t hard. But from a regulatory standpoint, it’s a massive paradigm shift.

Put simply, the U.S. housing finance market is just too massive — so massive that no asset class can afford to ignore its structural importance. According to JPMorgan, by the end of 2024, Fannie and Freddie together guarantee $6.6 trillion worth of mortgage-backed securities (MBS), covering over half of all U.S. mortgages.

Meanwhile, young Americans are being shut out by high home prices and rising interest rates. According to data from Redfin and Security.org, over half of Gen Z and Millennials have owned or currently hold crypto assets — and many bought their first home by selling crypto.

This group isn’t saving through wages, nor are they getting cash from rich parents — but they might hold BTC or ETH that surged during the bull run. Their wealth isn’t in banks; it’s on the blockchain. And under traditional finance standards, such assets can’t be evaluated — rendering them invisible to mortgage systems.

Incorporating crypto into mortgage evaluations is essentially about bringing this previously “credit-invisible” population into institutional view. It not only increases market participation but fundamentally expands the definition of acceptable collateral.

This may be the least visible — but most far-reaching — part of this policy shift. Let’s imagine a typical case:

• You bought $50,000 worth of BTC in 2017;

• By 2025, that BTC is worth $500,000;

• If you sell it, you’ll owe $90,000 in capital gains tax before you can use the money to buy a house;

• But now, you can instead collateralize $300,000 worth of BTC, get a mortgage at 9% interest — skip the taxes, and still retain Bitcoin’s upside potential.

That’s the “win-win” scenario of crypto mortgages: unlocking liquidity, avoiding taxable events, increasing buying power, and still holding onto asset appreciation.

Some platforms — like Milo Credit, People’s Reserve, and Moon Mortgage — already offer such services, with interest rates as low as 3.5% (with LTV capped at ~33%). A $300,000 crypto-backed mortgage, once policy-backed, could save $20,000–30,000 annually in interest versus a traditional mortgage — and completely bypass capital gains taxes on selling BTC.

If this model is adopted by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and other mainstream institutions, it could enable securitization and true liquidity injection — pushing crypto mortgages into the heart of the financial system.

Risks certainly exist. From former SEC official Corey Frayer to academic Hilary Allen, many have warned that using highly volatile crypto as mortgage collateral could pose systemic risks during sharp market corrections.

They’re not wrong. You can’t count on BTC rising 50% every year. What if borrowers get liquidated? How do lenders minimize losses? How does the system handle liquidity stress?To address these concerns, FHFA has proposed several “safety mechanisms”:

• Only accept crypto assets issued on U.S.-regulated centralized exchanges;

• Require risk buffer ratios to be set by Fannie and Freddie;

• All changes must be reviewed and approved by the board and FHFA.

In short, this isn’t an open floodgate — it’s a tightly regulated experiment with safety rails in place.

We’re witnessing an unprecedented turning point:

• Bitcoin is shifting from a digital currency to a recognized form of collateral;

• The mortgage market is evolving from income-based models to asset-based models;

• Government-Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) are gradually marketizing;

• Homeownership is transitioning from selling crypto to buy a house — to collateralizing crypto while keeping it.

The intersection of all these changes is precisely where the Bitcoin mortgage mechanism is rising. It may not replace traditional housing finance — but it will become a powerful complementary force. It bridges on-chain and off-chain assets, connects Gen Z to the legacy financial system, and provides a practical path for blending decentralized assets with federal-level credit instruments.

Every technological revolution begins with both doubt and passion.

Bitcoin-backed mortgages represent a gentle challenge to traditional financial rules. They may enable tax optimization, interest rate competition, and credit expansion — or trigger valuation confusion, volatility spillovers, and regulatory gaps.

But one thing is clear: what’s being unlocked isn’t just the liquidity of digital assets — it’s a new trust mechanism: Assets don’t have to sit in banks. Value doesn’t have to be defined by dollars.

When Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac truly begin incorporating Bitcoin into their risk models, the U.S. housing finance system may be entering a brand-new chapter.And the crypto world — at long last — will have found its real foothold in the off-chain world.