#Crypto #ETF #SEC

Over the past few days, a piece of news about the SEC has caused a stir in the crypto community: the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is considering establishing a “general listing standard” specifically for crypto ETFs.What does this mean? Up until now, getting a crypto ETF approved has been like “gambling” — before it’s approved, no one can guarantee the outcome, and no one knows what kind of “problems” might arise.

But if this general listing standard for crypto ETFs truly comes into effect, then crypto ETFs will enter the “fast lane.” All prospective crypto ETFs can be compared against this standard, and if they meet the criteria, approval is virtually guaranteed.

On the other hand, the SEC’s original intent in drafting this standard is to significantly speed up the approval process for such funds. According to sources cited by The Block, the new framework under discussion may drastically shorten the approval timeline — possibly simplifying it to just 75 days.

This is indeed a “fast track” for crypto ETF listings. It’s not just a “minor tweak,” but a potential “systemic revolution” that could reshape the entire crypto ETF landscape.

Traditional ETFs go through a “case-by-case approval” process. Every institution and product must submit a 19b-4 form, which the SEC reviews individually. The entire process is lengthy, cumbersome, and full of uncertainty — often criticized by institutions as “slow and opaque.”

But now, the SEC is brewing a new mechanism that essentially establishes a “pre-approved standard template.” As long as a future crypto ETF product fits this template, exchanges can directly approve its listing without going through the full process again.If implemented, this “template-based approval” would unleash the full potential of crypto ETF applications — similar to giving all crypto license plates on the highway their own dedicated “green lane.”

The SEC is shifting from the role of “approver” to “standard setter” — a major milestone in the evolution of ETF regulation.

Reports indicate that the new mechanism may reduce the current 240-day approval timeline to just 75 days — or even less. That means:

• ETF issuers can respond to market trends more quickly

• Investors can access diversified crypto investment tools faster

• Developers can build supporting services around the ETF ecosystem sooner (e.g., leveraged ETFs, ETF staking platforms, etc.)

Put simply, this is not just faster approval — it’s a signal of accelerated integration between financial infrastructure and the crypto ecosystem.

The new framework may consider the following core indicators:

• Market capitalization: The larger and more stable the asset, the lower the risk, and the easier the approval

• Degree of decentralization: Such as number of validators, on-chain governance mechanisms, and whether protocol upgrades rely on a small group

• Breadth of wallet distribution: Is there a problem of “whale concentration”? Is it prone to manipulation?

These standards reflect the SEC’s attempt to balance “efficiency and risk.” At the same time, they signal that projects wanting to enter Wall Street via ETFs must first build a healthier on-chain foundation.

According to new guidelines issued on July 1, all crypto ETF issuers must fully disclose the following risks in their prospectuses:

• Market price volatility

• Cybersecurity threats and attack risks

• Ethical and transparency risks of the project team

• Substitution risks posed by competing products

In other words, even with a “fast lane,” the SEC has not abandoned its baseline logic of “embedding investor protection into the mechanism.”

Truth Social, under Trump’s media group, has recently submitted an application for a “Crypto Blue Chip ETF,” aiming to launch a portfolio product that includes BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP and other major tokens.

This marks a moment when political forces are “personally stepping in” to promote the regulatory path for crypto ETFs. It’s not just a business move — it also reflects Trump and his political allies’ desire to release a “pro-crypto” policy signal.

According to Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart, the framework may see a draft released in July and take effect by September or October.

• SOL, XRP, LTC ETFs have up to a 95% chance of approval

• DOGE, ADA, DOT and other major coins also have over a 90% likelihood

This means that starting in 2025, we may see a whole wave of “non-Bitcoin” ETFs hitting the market together.

• Mainstream altcoins like SOL, XRP, LTC — with large market caps, strong communities, and good liquidity — fit the new standards best and belong in the first tier

• Infrastructure tokens like DOT, ATOM, NEAR — with technical neutrality and high decentralization — are ideal low-risk ETF candidates

• Projects backed by high-market-cap stablecoins like TRX and CRO — linked to real-world payments — may receive favorable ratings from institutions

• ETF issuers (e.g., 21Shares, VanEck): Faster approvals = faster launches = faster capital inflows

• Top exchanges (e.g., Coinbase, CBOE): More ETF listings mean more trading revenue and increased market share

• On-chain analytics tools / data providers (e.g., Arkham, Messari): As more investors enter the market, demand for transparency and real-time data will surge

1. The problem with crypto ETFs isn’t “whether they are compliant,” but “how to standardize them” By creating a standard template, the SEC is essentially acknowledging that crypto ETFs are fine in principle — it’s just the process that’s complicated.

2. Wall Street won’t miss out on the altcoin bull market Following BTC and ETH, traditional capital is looking for a “legitimate way” to join the altcoin boom — and ETFs are the most respectable entry point.

3. ETF standards = policy moat Whoever sets the standard gets to define the mainstream in the next bull cycle. This matters to both the SEC and political actors.

4. The clearer the standard, the faster institutions will enter Uncertainty is the enemy of institutional capital. Once the process becomes “templated,” institutions will deploy assets at scale without hesitation.

From the approval of spot BTC ETFs, to spot ETH ETFs about to go live, and now the proposed “fast track” mechanism — it’s clear the SEC is pushing for full institutionalization of crypto ETFs with a steady yet clearly favorable stance.

This isn’t just a regulatory shift — it’s the third wave of the crypto market entering the mainstream financial system.

• The first wave was the 2017 ICO boom

• The second wave was the 2021 DeFi and NFT explosion

• The third wave, now emerging, will be led by ETFs and institutional capital in a new paradigm

And don’t forget: ETFs aren’t the end point — they’re the beginning of institutional participation. The next market cycle’s driving force will be the “triple resonance” of regulatory certainty + capital scale + narrative logic.

So the question you should be asking now isn’t “When will the ETF fast track launch?” It’s: When crypto ETFs are fully approved — will I already be in position?

#Crypto #ETF #SEC

Over the past few days, a piece of news about the SEC has caused a stir in the crypto community: the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is considering establishing a “general listing standard” specifically for crypto ETFs.What does this mean? Up until now, getting a crypto ETF approved has been like “gambling” — before it’s approved, no one can guarantee the outcome, and no one knows what kind of “problems” might arise.

But if this general listing standard for crypto ETFs truly comes into effect, then crypto ETFs will enter the “fast lane.” All prospective crypto ETFs can be compared against this standard, and if they meet the criteria, approval is virtually guaranteed.

On the other hand, the SEC’s original intent in drafting this standard is to significantly speed up the approval process for such funds. According to sources cited by The Block, the new framework under discussion may drastically shorten the approval timeline — possibly simplifying it to just 75 days.

This is indeed a “fast track” for crypto ETF listings. It’s not just a “minor tweak,” but a potential “systemic revolution” that could reshape the entire crypto ETF landscape.

Traditional ETFs go through a “case-by-case approval” process. Every institution and product must submit a 19b-4 form, which the SEC reviews individually. The entire process is lengthy, cumbersome, and full of uncertainty — often criticized by institutions as “slow and opaque.”

But now, the SEC is brewing a new mechanism that essentially establishes a “pre-approved standard template.” As long as a future crypto ETF product fits this template, exchanges can directly approve its listing without going through the full process again.If implemented, this “template-based approval” would unleash the full potential of crypto ETF applications — similar to giving all crypto license plates on the highway their own dedicated “green lane.”

The SEC is shifting from the role of “approver” to “standard setter” — a major milestone in the evolution of ETF regulation.

Reports indicate that the new mechanism may reduce the current 240-day approval timeline to just 75 days — or even less. That means:

• ETF issuers can respond to market trends more quickly

• Investors can access diversified crypto investment tools faster

• Developers can build supporting services around the ETF ecosystem sooner (e.g., leveraged ETFs, ETF staking platforms, etc.)

Put simply, this is not just faster approval — it’s a signal of accelerated integration between financial infrastructure and the crypto ecosystem.

The new framework may consider the following core indicators:

• Market capitalization: The larger and more stable the asset, the lower the risk, and the easier the approval

• Degree of decentralization: Such as number of validators, on-chain governance mechanisms, and whether protocol upgrades rely on a small group

• Breadth of wallet distribution: Is there a problem of “whale concentration”? Is it prone to manipulation?

These standards reflect the SEC’s attempt to balance “efficiency and risk.” At the same time, they signal that projects wanting to enter Wall Street via ETFs must first build a healthier on-chain foundation.

According to new guidelines issued on July 1, all crypto ETF issuers must fully disclose the following risks in their prospectuses:

• Market price volatility

• Cybersecurity threats and attack risks

• Ethical and transparency risks of the project team

• Substitution risks posed by competing products

In other words, even with a “fast lane,” the SEC has not abandoned its baseline logic of “embedding investor protection into the mechanism.”

Truth Social, under Trump’s media group, has recently submitted an application for a “Crypto Blue Chip ETF,” aiming to launch a portfolio product that includes BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP and other major tokens.

This marks a moment when political forces are “personally stepping in” to promote the regulatory path for crypto ETFs. It’s not just a business move — it also reflects Trump and his political allies’ desire to release a “pro-crypto” policy signal.

According to Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart, the framework may see a draft released in July and take effect by September or October.

• SOL, XRP, LTC ETFs have up to a 95% chance of approval

• DOGE, ADA, DOT and other major coins also have over a 90% likelihood

This means that starting in 2025, we may see a whole wave of “non-Bitcoin” ETFs hitting the market together.

• Mainstream altcoins like SOL, XRP, LTC — with large market caps, strong communities, and good liquidity — fit the new standards best and belong in the first tier

• Infrastructure tokens like DOT, ATOM, NEAR — with technical neutrality and high decentralization — are ideal low-risk ETF candidates

• Projects backed by high-market-cap stablecoins like TRX and CRO — linked to real-world payments — may receive favorable ratings from institutions

• ETF issuers (e.g., 21Shares, VanEck): Faster approvals = faster launches = faster capital inflows

• Top exchanges (e.g., Coinbase, CBOE): More ETF listings mean more trading revenue and increased market share

• On-chain analytics tools / data providers (e.g., Arkham, Messari): As more investors enter the market, demand for transparency and real-time data will surge

1. The problem with crypto ETFs isn’t “whether they are compliant,” but “how to standardize them” By creating a standard template, the SEC is essentially acknowledging that crypto ETFs are fine in principle — it’s just the process that’s complicated.

2. Wall Street won’t miss out on the altcoin bull market Following BTC and ETH, traditional capital is looking for a “legitimate way” to join the altcoin boom — and ETFs are the most respectable entry point.

3. ETF standards = policy moat Whoever sets the standard gets to define the mainstream in the next bull cycle. This matters to both the SEC and political actors.

4. The clearer the standard, the faster institutions will enter Uncertainty is the enemy of institutional capital. Once the process becomes “templated,” institutions will deploy assets at scale without hesitation.

From the approval of spot BTC ETFs, to spot ETH ETFs about to go live, and now the proposed “fast track” mechanism — it’s clear the SEC is pushing for full institutionalization of crypto ETFs with a steady yet clearly favorable stance.

This isn’t just a regulatory shift — it’s the third wave of the crypto market entering the mainstream financial system.

• The first wave was the 2017 ICO boom

• The second wave was the 2021 DeFi and NFT explosion

• The third wave, now emerging, will be led by ETFs and institutional capital in a new paradigm

And don’t forget: ETFs aren’t the end point — they’re the beginning of institutional participation. The next market cycle’s driving force will be the “triple resonance” of regulatory certainty + capital scale + narrative logic.

So the question you should be asking now isn’t “When will the ETF fast track launch?” It’s: When crypto ETFs are fully approved — will I already be in position?