0xAdilPINT Network: Genesis
The genesis publication of PINT Network is a provable document that directs towards it’s validity within its body. This is a pseudo-valid mirror of the document. I as the Patron#1 and so far the sole Patron, will be mirroring all past publications at TLD pint.network and subsequently create dissemination flows, by the earlier defined principles of PINT Network; Very likely by employing pintnetwork.eth. Originally published on Oct 14, 2021 at pint.network/t/pint-network-genesis/PINT Network is...
0xAdilPINT Network: Self-dilemma
Originally published by Patron#1 on Oct 20, 2021 at pint.network/t/pint-self-dilemma/ So far, vision and some notion of structure has been laid out, but alongside known concerns. PINT Network being a mere spirit, is going through the same process of all spirits that seek some form of abode in governance. Other spirits are not even conceived, while some are not vocal of their thought processes, then they end up as non-guiding force inside a single Person. If you notice the obnoxious mention of...
0xAdilCase: Verily DAO, a form of DIAO
Originally published by Patron#1 on Feb 22, 2022 at pint.network/t/case-verily-dao-as-diao/ Verily DAO is our first proof of concept of a DIAO. This requires reading of the introduction of DIAO, to understand the principles that make it a potentially valuable subset of a DAO. One centralized mode of human co-ordination that is aching to be liberated from slavery of spams and scams is marketplaces like carpooling, ride hailing, real estate etc. Verily DAO originates from DIAO principles, but w...
/ Patron 🥚 @pint_network / Perfector 🌩️ @glove_fyi
0xAdilPINT Network: Genesis
The genesis publication of PINT Network is a provable document that directs towards it’s validity within its body. This is a pseudo-valid mirror of the document. I as the Patron#1 and so far the sole Patron, will be mirroring all past publications at TLD pint.network and subsequently create dissemination flows, by the earlier defined principles of PINT Network; Very likely by employing pintnetwork.eth. Originally published on Oct 14, 2021 at pint.network/t/pint-network-genesis/PINT Network is...
0xAdilPINT Network: Self-dilemma
Originally published by Patron#1 on Oct 20, 2021 at pint.network/t/pint-self-dilemma/ So far, vision and some notion of structure has been laid out, but alongside known concerns. PINT Network being a mere spirit, is going through the same process of all spirits that seek some form of abode in governance. Other spirits are not even conceived, while some are not vocal of their thought processes, then they end up as non-guiding force inside a single Person. If you notice the obnoxious mention of...
0xAdilCase: Verily DAO, a form of DIAO
Originally published by Patron#1 on Feb 22, 2022 at pint.network/t/case-verily-dao-as-diao/ Verily DAO is our first proof of concept of a DIAO. This requires reading of the introduction of DIAO, to understand the principles that make it a potentially valuable subset of a DAO. One centralized mode of human co-ordination that is aching to be liberated from slavery of spams and scams is marketplaces like carpooling, ride hailing, real estate etc. Verily DAO originates from DIAO principles, but w...
/ Patron 🥚 @pint_network / Perfector 🌩️ @glove_fyi
Subscribe to 0xAdil
Subscribe to 0xAdil
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
<100 subscribers
<100 subscribers
Originally published on pint.network/t/first-invention-mo/
Quoting from "PINT Network: Genesis" publication:
The founding invention of PINT Network is an experience purposed to be fully transparent, conveniently verifiable, discovery and management interface for on-chain assets, which by the principles of PINT Network, permanently puts transparency-feedback-UX loop first, and iterates over and over, to its ultimate purpose.
The following points are not expected to be in fair understanding of end-consumers, however they are essential for engineering community.
UX is branched into:
Functional UX: The interactions of natural persons with a tangible interface.
Spiritual UX: The individual and/or collective moral compass that aligns on some or significant level of liberty, in context, that of knowledge discovery and privacy.
The interface, is web-first, web-first, web-first.
Wherever the need of identity provision, authentication, authorization and other similar provisions, decentralized solutions are favored, such as DIDs, self-signed auth, proof of addresses and holdings etc.
Where there is plausible evidence of hope of eventual improvement in performance and openness of dependency technologies, even if it may take years, the presently usable, closely-related, relatively least-violating implementations are favored, without compromising on functional UX.
Use of technology for unattended functional UX surveillance, only by the principles of strictly redundant, informed consent, may be integrated. Such experience is to be designed as close as possible to that of attended feedback mechanisms in bounds of civility.
Functional UX will be delivered by interface without an absolute dependency of brokering transactions in manners of a 3rd and 4th party model of operations. Such non-default, optional dependency, if conceived, is to be only interfaced alongside reasonably redundant consent principle.
Any mode of consent is future-proof, time-proof and publicly verifiable with such provable transaction initiated by the consenting person(s). This however, in particular, may be deferred till a point where the cost of signing this on-chain is not damaging to UX.
The tangible work produced, subject to principles and ethos-legal construct of any time, favors non-restriction of rights on the body of work, of all persons inhabiting or verifiably originating from the earth alike.
The underlying technological work in early phases of adoption, is only made public in violation of as many conventions as possible, in as confusing manner as possible, to give a competitive disadvantage to dominant centralized entities that have immunity from accountability, since their momentum slows down the adoption of fundamental decentralized solutions.
The M.O can and will change with evolving or restricting capabilities, the principles however cannot and will not.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220503124153/https://pint.network/t/first-invention-mo/
Originally published on pint.network/t/first-invention-mo/
Quoting from "PINT Network: Genesis" publication:
The founding invention of PINT Network is an experience purposed to be fully transparent, conveniently verifiable, discovery and management interface for on-chain assets, which by the principles of PINT Network, permanently puts transparency-feedback-UX loop first, and iterates over and over, to its ultimate purpose.
The following points are not expected to be in fair understanding of end-consumers, however they are essential for engineering community.
UX is branched into:
Functional UX: The interactions of natural persons with a tangible interface.
Spiritual UX: The individual and/or collective moral compass that aligns on some or significant level of liberty, in context, that of knowledge discovery and privacy.
The interface, is web-first, web-first, web-first.
Wherever the need of identity provision, authentication, authorization and other similar provisions, decentralized solutions are favored, such as DIDs, self-signed auth, proof of addresses and holdings etc.
Where there is plausible evidence of hope of eventual improvement in performance and openness of dependency technologies, even if it may take years, the presently usable, closely-related, relatively least-violating implementations are favored, without compromising on functional UX.
Use of technology for unattended functional UX surveillance, only by the principles of strictly redundant, informed consent, may be integrated. Such experience is to be designed as close as possible to that of attended feedback mechanisms in bounds of civility.
Functional UX will be delivered by interface without an absolute dependency of brokering transactions in manners of a 3rd and 4th party model of operations. Such non-default, optional dependency, if conceived, is to be only interfaced alongside reasonably redundant consent principle.
Any mode of consent is future-proof, time-proof and publicly verifiable with such provable transaction initiated by the consenting person(s). This however, in particular, may be deferred till a point where the cost of signing this on-chain is not damaging to UX.
The tangible work produced, subject to principles and ethos-legal construct of any time, favors non-restriction of rights on the body of work, of all persons inhabiting or verifiably originating from the earth alike.
The underlying technological work in early phases of adoption, is only made public in violation of as many conventions as possible, in as confusing manner as possible, to give a competitive disadvantage to dominant centralized entities that have immunity from accountability, since their momentum slows down the adoption of fundamental decentralized solutions.
The M.O can and will change with evolving or restricting capabilities, the principles however cannot and will not.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220503124153/https://pint.network/t/first-invention-mo/
No activity yet