Recently, jinkeyu, daughter of jinliqun, interim Secretary General of the Asian investment bank, has become a topic figure. She has been labeled as "born better than you, smarter than you, and harder than you". Such a bully is enough to make most people feel that they don't know how to deal with themselves, or even feel uncomfortable. How to view this phenomenon? People who seem to be less successful may be due to a lot of efforts to overcome "birth" It is indeed admirable that Xueba comes from a good family background, but it cannot be denied that "good family background" is often the reason why he becomes a Xueba. Articles that raise topics, This is how Jin Keyu was introduced: "She is proficient in English, French, Spanish and Italian; she loves literature and art, and her piano and clarinet skills have reached the professional level; she has completed all undergraduate courses at Harvard in only two years; at the age of 25, she received a doctorate in Harvard economics... In 83, she is now the youngest professor of macroeconomics at the London School of political economy; and her father is a former Vice Minister of the Ministry of Finance and a former director of CICC Mr. Jin Liqun, the current head of aiib. " The article also deliberately emphasizes the influence of jinliqun on her daughter: "Thanks to his father's strong literary complex and good English education at home, when he was still in junior high school attached to the National People's Congress, he read all the original works of Shakespeare, and then went to harrisman high school in New York to continue his studies. Of the 14 partners in his class, 12 got admitted to Harvard, and the remaining two received notices from Stanford and Princeton respectively. In that year, he graduated with the first total score of harrisman high school, and went to Harvard to study Learn. " Regardless of whether the above introduction is flattering or not, only from the hard indicators such as "Harvard" and "the youngest professor", Jin Keyu's achievements, according to the general social cognition, are enough to "kill" 99.9% of the people. As a result, many people inevitably have such a view, "a person with such a good background can live well without any effort, but I am ashamed of her efforts to achieve such achievements.". Part of the reason for this recognition is that compared with the well-known images of the second generation of officials and the second generation of rich people, Jin Keyu is so different that many people subconsciously do not attribute his success to his family background. Of course, this understanding is biased. It is normal for a well-off family whose parents have a higher education level to require their children to receive a higher education and show it in the form of paying attention to their children's learning, giving them more encouragement, and willing to invest in education for their children. Of course, there are many cases of overindulgence and children's failure to live up to their expectations, such as the Li Shuangjiang family. Because this situation is more topical, people tend to ignore it. Examples such as Jin Liqun's cultivation of Jin Keyu may be the majority. One evidence is that every summer, more than 100000 Chinese students come from China to the United States to experience American life and culture, some of whom are only 10 years old. Most of their ambitions are to enter the best schools in the United States. In fact, many people have succeeded. For example, Jin Keyu's alma mater, the high school attached to the National People's Congress, has long been a well-known "preparatory school for studying in the United States". Most of the parents of these people are relatively affluent senior intellectuals. It is natural that family background is helpful to the success of children, but the resulting differences should be eliminated Is the correlation between family background and children's success reasonable? To a large extent, of course, it is reasonable. However, some people have pointed out the irrationality in a burst of blood. Xi Ru, a well-known Douban netizen, wrote in an article, "those who seem to be less successful do not lack the same smart efforts, but when they make the same (or even more) smart efforts, some of them need to be used to 'overcome' their origins.". Such footnotes can be found everywhere. For example, students with ordinary family background are often not comparable with students with superior family background in "vision" and "insight". Some netizens describe such differences—— "Also in 985 and 211 universities, I have many students from ordinary families who simply don't know what direction to strive for and what possibilities will be in the future besides studying hard. We have wasted all our time in the self-study room. In the end, the best thing is to escort our graduate students. However, there are students from highly knowledgeable families around us. Since they entered the University, they have worked hard to participate in the student union, news agency, class competition, writing papers, and participating in the exchange of life activities In the end, they went far away than us. We used to think that going to college was just running together, but it was not. It was like fitness. The effect of your own practice was very different from that of having a coach around you. " Is this difference reasonable? It can be taken for granted that highly educated families and wealthy families know better how to educate their children and devote more to their children's education. Who doesn't want their children to excel and live better than others? This difference is inevitable unless families are abolished. Some people may envy Plato's philosopher Kingdom, where the state raises and educates every baby, but it is obviously just a utopia. However, it must be pointed out that the family background causes the difference between people. This reason is reasonable. It can not explain that the result is reasonable - obviously, this will lead to the solidification of the stratum, allowing the rich to form a cycle of wealth and the poor to form a cycle of poverty - because they can't even use knowledge to break the difference. This will obviously destroy the vitality of a society and lead to various social problems. Therefore, the basic ideas of many countries in terms of education policies are "don't let a child fall behind" and "let the child be on the same starting line". The education equality mentioned here does not mean the equality of national education resources investment - because the investment of family education resources has been very different - but the equality of educational efficiency. At present, the way to break the "different origins" is the college entrance examination, but there are already many problems In China, the biggest way to achieve equal educational efficiency is the college entrance examination. Through this relatively fair selection scheme, students from high-tech, rich families and students from poor families can compete on the same starting line, so that there will not be a big gap in their future. However, regardless of the unfair distribution of quotas, different examination papers in different regions, and the inability to achieve the college entrance examination in key regions, the college entrance examination has become more and more inadequate in regulating educational equality. Anhui Maotanchang middle school, which is famous for China on the tip of the tongue, is a clear proof. This huge high school, known as the "college entrance examination factory", has given ordinary students the opportunity to "test too high and be handsome" and "defeat the second generation of officials" by means of "military management", "banning all entertainment", "sea test tactics" and "parents' hard study", but this is at the expense of the best years of life and buried in exam oriented education. The same type of high school also has the famous Hebei Hengshui middle school. As far as the college entrance examination is concerned, this is a top middle school, no less than the high school attached to the National People's Congress where Jin Keyu is located. Every year, as many as 100 people can be admitted to Tsinghua and Peking University. However, there is great doubt about the sustainability of the talents created by the "Hengshui model". Compared with the large number of well-known alumni of the high school attached to the National People's Congress and Beijing No. 4 middle school, Hengshui middle school seems to have never published the follow-up survey results of graduates. Some netizens questioned that "no one knows the admission rate of hengzhong graduates' postgraduate entrance examination, Bao Yan admission rate, judicial examination pass rate, national examination pass rate, Ivy League full scholarship rate and public school pass rate." Xiongbingqi, a well-known education expert, also believes that, It is necessary to make a follow-up survey of students from Hengshui middle school who went to Tsinghua University and Peking University—— "If the tracking data of Peking University and Tsinghua University on the students of Hengshui middle school from enrollment, four years of study to university, and graduation shows that the graduates of Hengshui middle school have strong adaptability to university, their academic performance is still excellent in Peking University and Tsinghua University, and their innovation awareness and cooperation ability are not inferior to other students, then the criticism of Hengshui middle school should be adjusted to analyze the merits of its education and teaching management; on the contrary, if Hengshui middle school Graduates, after entering the University, have disappeared from the public. So if they agree with scholars in Hengshui, they should reflect. If they are admitted to a famous university at all costs, they will consider it a success in life and career. Is it just a bubble? " The attention Jin Keyu received magnified the embarrassment of Hengshui middle school and Maotanchang middle school. Moreover, the times are advancing, and the college entrance examination has become less and less decisive for a person's future. What else can we do to make students from ordinary families counter attack? To solve the problem, the state needs to increase investment in education, especially training more excellent teachers In the 1960s, the United States once launched an educational affirmative action movement, whose theoretical basis came from the famous Coleman report. The conclusions of this report are as follows: the order of important factors affecting academic achievement is as follows: first, students' family economic and cultural background; Second, the quality of teachers; Third, school facilities and courses. As mentioned above, the influence of family economic and cultural background on one's academic achievement is the most important, but this difference is inevitable; With the development of social productivity, school facilities and curriculum have been improving, and the difference has been small. What the state can and should do to enable children to stand on the same starting line is to improve the quality of teachers and reasonably allocate teacher resources. In addition, it is also a possible policy choice to establish a public service Academic Help Center for children to provide educational tutoring support for students from socially disadvantaged families and poor academic performance. In the UK, the government pays for the establishment of breakfast clubs and after-school clubs in community service centers or libraries to provide computers and learning materials for children from disadvantaged families. Provide "one-on-one tutoring" for children who receive free lunch to improve their academic performance. In the United States, the government provides educational compensation to children from low-income families through the "after school program". We can also learn from the practice of developed countries to provide free tutoring and tutoring to the children of vulnerable groups based on schools to help them overcome their academic difficulties. The necessary funds can be paid by government taxes. epilogue "Schools should not only provide equal educational resources, but also protect students from inequality caused by birth and social environment" - quoted from Coleman report. At a time when a super school bully like Jin Keyu is attracting attention, we should be more clear about what is the true meaning of "keeping children on the same starting line".

Recently, jinkeyu, daughter of jinliqun, interim Secretary General of the Asian investment bank, has become a topic figure. She has been labeled as "born better than you, smarter than you, and harder than you". Such a bully is enough to make most people feel that they don't know how to deal with themselves, or even feel uncomfortable. How to view this phenomenon? People who seem to be less successful may be due to a lot of efforts to overcome "birth" It is indeed admirable that Xueba comes from a good family background, but it cannot be denied that "good family background" is often the reason why he becomes a Xueba. Articles that raise topics, This is how Jin Keyu was introduced: "She is proficient in English, French, Spanish and Italian; she loves literature and art, and her piano and clarinet skills have reached the professional level; she has completed all undergraduate courses at Harvard in only two years; at the age of 25, she received a doctorate in Harvard economics... In 83, she is now the youngest professor of macroeconomics at the London School of political economy; and her father is a former Vice Minister of the Ministry of Finance and a former director of CICC Mr. Jin Liqun, the current head of aiib. " The article also deliberately emphasizes the influence of jinliqun on her daughter: "Thanks to his father's strong literary complex and good English education at home, when he was still in junior high school attached to the National People's Congress, he read all the original works of Shakespeare, and then went to harrisman high school in New York to continue his studies. Of the 14 partners in his class, 12 got admitted to Harvard, and the remaining two received notices from Stanford and Princeton respectively. In that year, he graduated with the first total score of harrisman high school, and went to Harvard to study Learn. " Regardless of whether the above introduction is flattering or not, only from the hard indicators such as "Harvard" and "the youngest professor", Jin Keyu's achievements, according to the general social cognition, are enough to "kill" 99.9% of the people. As a result, many people inevitably have such a view, "a person with such a good background can live well without any effort, but I am ashamed of her efforts to achieve such achievements.". Part of the reason for this recognition is that compared with the well-known images of the second generation of officials and the second generation of rich people, Jin Keyu is so different that many people subconsciously do not attribute his success to his family background. Of course, this understanding is biased. It is normal for a well-off family whose parents have a higher education level to require their children to receive a higher education and show it in the form of paying attention to their children's learning, giving them more encouragement, and willing to invest in education for their children. Of course, there are many cases of overindulgence and children's failure to live up to their expectations, such as the Li Shuangjiang family. Because this situation is more topical, people tend to ignore it. Examples such as Jin Liqun's cultivation of Jin Keyu may be the majority. One evidence is that every summer, more than 100000 Chinese students come from China to the United States to experience American life and culture, some of whom are only 10 years old. Most of their ambitions are to enter the best schools in the United States. In fact, many people have succeeded. For example, Jin Keyu's alma mater, the high school attached to the National People's Congress, has long been a well-known "preparatory school for studying in the United States". Most of the parents of these people are relatively affluent senior intellectuals. It is natural that family background is helpful to the success of children, but the resulting differences should be eliminated Is the correlation between family background and children's success reasonable? To a large extent, of course, it is reasonable. However, some people have pointed out the irrationality in a burst of blood. Xi Ru, a well-known Douban netizen, wrote in an article, "those who seem to be less successful do not lack the same smart efforts, but when they make the same (or even more) smart efforts, some of them need to be used to 'overcome' their origins.". Such footnotes can be found everywhere. For example, students with ordinary family background are often not comparable with students with superior family background in "vision" and "insight". Some netizens describe such differences—— "Also in 985 and 211 universities, I have many students from ordinary families who simply don't know what direction to strive for and what possibilities will be in the future besides studying hard. We have wasted all our time in the self-study room. In the end, the best thing is to escort our graduate students. However, there are students from highly knowledgeable families around us. Since they entered the University, they have worked hard to participate in the student union, news agency, class competition, writing papers, and participating in the exchange of life activities In the end, they went far away than us. We used to think that going to college was just running together, but it was not. It was like fitness. The effect of your own practice was very different from that of having a coach around you. " Is this difference reasonable? It can be taken for granted that highly educated families and wealthy families know better how to educate their children and devote more to their children's education. Who doesn't want their children to excel and live better than others? This difference is inevitable unless families are abolished. Some people may envy Plato's philosopher Kingdom, where the state raises and educates every baby, but it is obviously just a utopia. However, it must be pointed out that the family background causes the difference between people. This reason is reasonable. It can not explain that the result is reasonable - obviously, this will lead to the solidification of the stratum, allowing the rich to form a cycle of wealth and the poor to form a cycle of poverty - because they can't even use knowledge to break the difference. This will obviously destroy the vitality of a society and lead to various social problems. Therefore, the basic ideas of many countries in terms of education policies are "don't let a child fall behind" and "let the child be on the same starting line". The education equality mentioned here does not mean the equality of national education resources investment - because the investment of family education resources has been very different - but the equality of educational efficiency. At present, the way to break the "different origins" is the college entrance examination, but there are already many problems In China, the biggest way to achieve equal educational efficiency is the college entrance examination. Through this relatively fair selection scheme, students from high-tech, rich families and students from poor families can compete on the same starting line, so that there will not be a big gap in their future. However, regardless of the unfair distribution of quotas, different examination papers in different regions, and the inability to achieve the college entrance examination in key regions, the college entrance examination has become more and more inadequate in regulating educational equality. Anhui Maotanchang middle school, which is famous for China on the tip of the tongue, is a clear proof. This huge high school, known as the "college entrance examination factory", has given ordinary students the opportunity to "test too high and be handsome" and "defeat the second generation of officials" by means of "military management", "banning all entertainment", "sea test tactics" and "parents' hard study", but this is at the expense of the best years of life and buried in exam oriented education. The same type of high school also has the famous Hebei Hengshui middle school. As far as the college entrance examination is concerned, this is a top middle school, no less than the high school attached to the National People's Congress where Jin Keyu is located. Every year, as many as 100 people can be admitted to Tsinghua and Peking University. However, there is great doubt about the sustainability of the talents created by the "Hengshui model". Compared with the large number of well-known alumni of the high school attached to the National People's Congress and Beijing No. 4 middle school, Hengshui middle school seems to have never published the follow-up survey results of graduates. Some netizens questioned that "no one knows the admission rate of hengzhong graduates' postgraduate entrance examination, Bao Yan admission rate, judicial examination pass rate, national examination pass rate, Ivy League full scholarship rate and public school pass rate." Xiongbingqi, a well-known education expert, also believes that, It is necessary to make a follow-up survey of students from Hengshui middle school who went to Tsinghua University and Peking University—— "If the tracking data of Peking University and Tsinghua University on the students of Hengshui middle school from enrollment, four years of study to university, and graduation shows that the graduates of Hengshui middle school have strong adaptability to university, their academic performance is still excellent in Peking University and Tsinghua University, and their innovation awareness and cooperation ability are not inferior to other students, then the criticism of Hengshui middle school should be adjusted to analyze the merits of its education and teaching management; on the contrary, if Hengshui middle school Graduates, after entering the University, have disappeared from the public. So if they agree with scholars in Hengshui, they should reflect. If they are admitted to a famous university at all costs, they will consider it a success in life and career. Is it just a bubble? " The attention Jin Keyu received magnified the embarrassment of Hengshui middle school and Maotanchang middle school. Moreover, the times are advancing, and the college entrance examination has become less and less decisive for a person's future. What else can we do to make students from ordinary families counter attack? To solve the problem, the state needs to increase investment in education, especially training more excellent teachers In the 1960s, the United States once launched an educational affirmative action movement, whose theoretical basis came from the famous Coleman report. The conclusions of this report are as follows: the order of important factors affecting academic achievement is as follows: first, students' family economic and cultural background; Second, the quality of teachers; Third, school facilities and courses. As mentioned above, the influence of family economic and cultural background on one's academic achievement is the most important, but this difference is inevitable; With the development of social productivity, school facilities and curriculum have been improving, and the difference has been small. What the state can and should do to enable children to stand on the same starting line is to improve the quality of teachers and reasonably allocate teacher resources. In addition, it is also a possible policy choice to establish a public service Academic Help Center for children to provide educational tutoring support for students from socially disadvantaged families and poor academic performance. In the UK, the government pays for the establishment of breakfast clubs and after-school clubs in community service centers or libraries to provide computers and learning materials for children from disadvantaged families. Provide "one-on-one tutoring" for children who receive free lunch to improve their academic performance. In the United States, the government provides educational compensation to children from low-income families through the "after school program". We can also learn from the practice of developed countries to provide free tutoring and tutoring to the children of vulnerable groups based on schools to help them overcome their academic difficulties. The necessary funds can be paid by government taxes. epilogue "Schools should not only provide equal educational resources, but also protect students from inequality caused by birth and social environment" - quoted from Coleman report. At a time when a super school bully like Jin Keyu is attracting attention, we should be more clear about what is the true meaning of "keeping children on the same starting line".