Buidler DAOAn in-depth analysis of how 20 million $OP got stolen
I woke up this morning to the news of Optimism’s stolen 20 million OP governance tokens across major crypto news outlets and heated discussion of it among my friends and my readers. It’s no surprise that the panic spreads this quickly - after all, Optimism has just finished a round of airdrop involving multiple interested parties, and it has been put on the pedestal to be the most influential Layer 2 scaling solution.Before getting into the details of the incident, let’s first talk about Opti...
Buidler DAO区块链经济模型设计中基础经济学理论使用的思路探索
Web3人才和项目网络BuidlerDAOBuidlerDAO is a crypto community uniting engineers, researchers and operators. We aims to BUIDL an influential and productive leading network for Web3 buidlers and accelerator for projects.https://nextme.one商务合作WeChat：MiaoFrank1229文章：@BuidlerDAO 作者：@付少庆 @BuidlerDAO 经济模型小组 编排：@Lexi @createpjf 注：文章仅代表个人观点，不构成任何投资意见作者说一个区块链系统的经济模型设计对项目是否成功有着至关重要的作用，很多项目负责人想弄清楚怎样设计经济模型？在这些设计工作中，经济模型的支撑理论是什么，方法论是什么，是很多设计者首要思考的问题。因为笔者在区块链领域探索多年，阅读了大量区块链项目的白皮书，对一些项目的经济模型设计做过比较深入的分析和对比。再加上我们的团队也在...
Buidler DAOEthereum 2.0 changes, where will Ethereum and Miner go?
Author: Daling reseaech — bocaibocai.eth Since the launch of the mainnet in 2015, Ethereum has gone through several updates. Currently, Ethereum is in the third stage of its four planned stages (Frontier, Homestead, Metropolis, Serenity) and is about to start the final stage. In the Serenity stage, the consensus mechanism will convert from POW to POS after the merge of Ethereum beacon chain and origin chain. Ethereum upgrade could affect the interests of different parties, which are worth bil...
Paradise for #Web3 learners, researchers and developers. Move over HODL, it's time to #BUIDL!
Buidler DAOAn in-depth analysis of how 20 million $OP got stolen
I woke up this morning to the news of Optimism’s stolen 20 million OP governance tokens across major crypto news outlets and heated discussion of it among my friends and my readers. It’s no surprise that the panic spreads this quickly - after all, Optimism has just finished a round of airdrop involving multiple interested parties, and it has been put on the pedestal to be the most influential Layer 2 scaling solution.Before getting into the details of the incident, let’s first talk about Opti...
Buidler DAO区块链经济模型设计中基础经济学理论使用的思路探索
Web3人才和项目网络BuidlerDAOBuidlerDAO is a crypto community uniting engineers, researchers and operators. We aims to BUIDL an influential and productive leading network for Web3 buidlers and accelerator for projects.https://nextme.one商务合作WeChat：MiaoFrank1229文章：@BuidlerDAO 作者：@付少庆 @BuidlerDAO 经济模型小组 编排：@Lexi @createpjf 注：文章仅代表个人观点，不构成任何投资意见作者说一个区块链系统的经济模型设计对项目是否成功有着至关重要的作用，很多项目负责人想弄清楚怎样设计经济模型？在这些设计工作中，经济模型的支撑理论是什么，方法论是什么，是很多设计者首要思考的问题。因为笔者在区块链领域探索多年，阅读了大量区块链项目的白皮书，对一些项目的经济模型设计做过比较深入的分析和对比。再加上我们的团队也在...
Buidler DAOEthereum 2.0 changes, where will Ethereum and Miner go?
Author: Daling reseaech — bocaibocai.eth Since the launch of the mainnet in 2015, Ethereum has gone through several updates. Currently, Ethereum is in the third stage of its four planned stages (Frontier, Homestead, Metropolis, Serenity) and is about to start the final stage. In the Serenity stage, the consensus mechanism will convert from POW to POS after the merge of Ethereum beacon chain and origin chain. Ethereum upgrade could affect the interests of different parties, which are worth bil...
Paradise for #Web3 learners, researchers and developers. Move over HODL, it's time to #BUIDL!
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Subscribe to Buidler DAO
Subscribe to Buidler DAO
<100 subscribers
<100 subscribers
For experienced crypto investors, there are several sectors that seemed promising but didn’t live up to the expectation: crypto wallets, privacy, and DAO.
Of these sectors, though with high expectations, there haven't been any successful projects until today. Especially in the crypto wallet sector, so many failed projects cost tons of investors’ money in the last two crypto cycles. Nevertheless, plenty of people still hold solid faith in it.
As an experienced crypto investor, I will try to break away from the traditional frameworks, and rethink the status quo, dilemma and future prospect of this sector.
For common blockchain users, there are two kinds of most frequently used mobile apps: exchange apps and wallet apps. The majority of users’ crypto assets are saved or displayed in these apps.
Right now, among the top 20 cryptocurrencies, one of them, BNB, falls into the exchange asset category and none of them is in the wallet category. Expanding the scope to the top 100, five of them are exchange assets while wallet assets remain 0.
For an industry that frequently faces regulatory risks, centralized crypto exchanges are the prioritized targets for regulations. Every time when the news or the insider information, either true or fake, occurs, investors would rush to withdraw their crypto assets from CEXs to their crypto wallets. In crypto-native views, depositing assets to the crypto wallets is equivalent to saving assets on the blockchain. And storing these assets on the blockchain, with which they themselves have the only accessible private key, is much more reliable than storing assets in CEXs. Thus, for a user, a crypto wallet is indispensable, fulfilling needs including generating new addresses, backups, transferring assets, displaying balances, etc.
For example, when China issued the ban on ICOs on September 4, 2017, Imtoken became the most popular crypto wallet all over the world, with many users withdrawing their assets from CEXs (Huobi, Okex, BTC.China, etc.) to Imtoken wallets to avoid the loss they may suffer if the exchanges were to be shut down. Attributed to the impact of the ban, Imtoken was able to rapidly grow its user base, laying a great foundation for its leading position in the industry in the following two years. With its then popularity, Imtoken soon closed its A-series funding led by IDG.
There seemed to be a consensus regarding the crypto wallet’s prevalent use and perceived significant role for the crypto industry. With such a strong consensus and the low market cap, it seemed terribly undervalued and thus good timing to invest in this sector.
Unfortunately, however, the market doesn’t respond the way we expected - wallet projects remain low of their market cap.
Let’s take a look at some funding info:
In June 2016, Imtoken raised angel investment from TISIWI capital, and later closed A round financing led by IDG.
In July 2016, Blockchain bagged 40 million dollars in series B funding.
In April 2018, TokenPocket raised several millions from angel investors.
In August 2018, Binance announced its acquisition of Trust Wallet.
In May 2020, Binance announced its investment in Safepal.
In December 2020, Math Wallet closed a 12-million series B funding led by Binance.
In November 2021, Coinbase acquired Breadwallet.
Before 2018, the funding of wallet projects was often led by VCs. After that, it was mainly provided by top centralized exchanges for investment or acquisition purposes.
The reason behind this is simple: with a fast-growing user base and capital influx in the crypto market, exchanges are becoming the absolute dominant players.
They are equipped with enough motivation to maintain or even strengthen their monopoly and abundant capital for investments.
At the same time, with the crypto space’s rapid development in the last few years, trading in the secondary market is no longer the only use case for the industry. With the invention of DEX, Defi, NFT, GameFi and SocialFi, users are no longer bound to do trading in central exchanges. They can opt to withdraw money to the blockchain and engage in different kinds of fun and profitable dApps or Defi products. Crypto wallets are the best tools and entry points for such growing demands.
Centralized exchanges will suffer from huge outflow of both users and assets if they don’t make any changes.
With such a strong motivation and their deep bankrolls, investment or acquisition is the most economic and efficient way for exchanges to cut into this sector. And wallet startups are the most suitable targets for their investment.
For wallet providers, who struggle to make profits, it's hard to turn down the offer for them to cash out.
Why is it so difficult for wallet businesses to make profits while they are so important in this industry?
I think the main reason is, while the business is called a “wallet”, they are in fact not closely related to the user's on-chain assets.
The revenue sources for exchanges are very straightforward: trading fees, listing fees, staking, market making, investments, financing, mining, etc. It’s quite easy for exchanges to gain profits, in ways we can or cannot imagine.
Centralized exchanges absorb and keep real users and assets. Users will utilize or invest their assets in the exchanges when presented with a chance to make money. When users are to make withdrawals, exchanges can delay or even refuse the withdrawals by means of delayed verification or account blockage. In essence, exchanges have authorities over their users’ assets.
Unlike exchanges, crypto wallets don't keep users’ assets. They only serve as a way to display the assets, but not storing them - all assets still stay “on-chain”. Wallets are more of only a tool for asset visualization or transfers. They have no means to prevent users from switching to other wallet providers or to intervene in users' asset transfers.
Users have relatively low barriers and maximum freedom over their assets in wallets, so they are not strongly tied to any wallet providers.
As for now, lots of wallet providers are working to solve this dilemma, taking actions including providing financing products, security solutions, and news services, serving ads or even starting hardware wallet business. But none of these efforts are truly profitable, or creating sustainable business advantages.
Many users prefer wallets over exchanges for two reasons: security and full control. It might be a mistake from the very beginning if wallet providers try to make profits from users’ assets the same way as exchanges do.
We tried to classify crypto users based on their trading preferences: traders, holders, and dApp users.
Traders trade frequently and value liquidity. They’d prefer to deposit assets in exchanges and be prepared to trade anytime.
Holders seldomly trade. They care most about security. Once they purchase an asset, holders will withdraw the assets into decentralized wallets or hardware wallets, not considering selling for a while. They also tend to purchase in large volumes.
DApp users, on the other hand, would like to embrace new applications and concepts, for example, Web3, Metaverse, DeFi, GameFi, NFT, or DAO fundraising and crowdfunding. They are active users of wallets.
These three types of users are not fixed; they can be interchangeable and may co-exist in one individual.
Judging from the direction of blockchain industry evolution, I believe with the improvement of blockchain performance, there will be an even richer dApp ecosystem, attracting more users to become dApp users. Although a considerable amount of users will probably still stay as traders for the foreseeable future, the growth trajectory of dApp users is self-explanatory.
As the entrance for users into the crypto world, wallet providers should explore how to serve the growing community of dApp users. Instead of user assets, they should focus on user behaviors, and explore how to serve use cases like web3 and metaverse.
There are quite a lot of unmet needs of the dApp users. To name a few, how to protect users from phishing dApps? How to detect suspicious authorization? How to avoid being misled by zero-width characters? How to visualize on-chain data? And all kinds of alerts, for example, for whale activities. There are still quite a few we haven't listed out yet. Wallet providers don’t have to provide all these functionalities; just striving to satisfy a focused few can help develop a closer bond with users and their assets.
In the long run, blockchain technology will eventually be prevalently adopted. Future dApps, regardless of which chain they are on, form the decentralized Web3 world for users to explore. At that stage, all chains are so secure and user-friendly enough that users won’t need to know which chain the dApps run on, nor will they care. They just need a convenient and integrated entrance into the world. The wallets could be the entrance.
Seeing from the future perspective, it might be inaccurate or even misleading to call the entrance a “wallet”.
Once I was in discussion with a friend in the wallet business, he argued that a wallet should be simple and straightford, only serving the single purpose of storing users’ assets. He maintained that a wallet startup should aim to become the “Alipay/Paypal” in the crypto industry.
It might be many people's stereotype that crypto wallets should be equivalent to “Alipay/Paypal”. However, it's very unlikely that the wallets will ever become such a thing - they serve different kinds of assets with different usages.
Users do need a wallet for crypto assets, but they need more than that. The current wallet is only a tool for on-chain asset display or transfers. While the wallet may be useful, it doesn't mean it is valuable.
The current business model of wallets, either as a backup wallet of exchange assets, or as a tool to display assets, won't bring attractive valuation to the business. Only when the “wallet” becomes the entrance into Web3, the business can have the potential to achieve as high a valuation as exchanges.
I can't yet think up a clear path of how wallets can become such an entrance. It might be:
Using the DID identity system, manage users’ wallet addresses across different chains using a unified identity.
As a safe and reliable entrance to explore the web3 world.
Build successful dapps through investment or incubation, and bring traffic into wallets through the dApps.
As the “App store” of dApps instead of an asset tool, satisfy users' diversified needs.
This remains an open question. If we continue to follow and research the development of the wallet industry, we may be able to identify good investment opportunities.
Original link：
用户需要的并仅仅是一个钱包，而是一个链上资产的显示和转账工具。
Translation：@Alex
Proofreading: @YaruiP
Layout：@Coucou
建设成为最有影响力和生产力的 Web3 人才与项目孵化器
For experienced crypto investors, there are several sectors that seemed promising but didn’t live up to the expectation: crypto wallets, privacy, and DAO.
Of these sectors, though with high expectations, there haven't been any successful projects until today. Especially in the crypto wallet sector, so many failed projects cost tons of investors’ money in the last two crypto cycles. Nevertheless, plenty of people still hold solid faith in it.
As an experienced crypto investor, I will try to break away from the traditional frameworks, and rethink the status quo, dilemma and future prospect of this sector.
For common blockchain users, there are two kinds of most frequently used mobile apps: exchange apps and wallet apps. The majority of users’ crypto assets are saved or displayed in these apps.
Right now, among the top 20 cryptocurrencies, one of them, BNB, falls into the exchange asset category and none of them is in the wallet category. Expanding the scope to the top 100, five of them are exchange assets while wallet assets remain 0.
For an industry that frequently faces regulatory risks, centralized crypto exchanges are the prioritized targets for regulations. Every time when the news or the insider information, either true or fake, occurs, investors would rush to withdraw their crypto assets from CEXs to their crypto wallets. In crypto-native views, depositing assets to the crypto wallets is equivalent to saving assets on the blockchain. And storing these assets on the blockchain, with which they themselves have the only accessible private key, is much more reliable than storing assets in CEXs. Thus, for a user, a crypto wallet is indispensable, fulfilling needs including generating new addresses, backups, transferring assets, displaying balances, etc.
For example, when China issued the ban on ICOs on September 4, 2017, Imtoken became the most popular crypto wallet all over the world, with many users withdrawing their assets from CEXs (Huobi, Okex, BTC.China, etc.) to Imtoken wallets to avoid the loss they may suffer if the exchanges were to be shut down. Attributed to the impact of the ban, Imtoken was able to rapidly grow its user base, laying a great foundation for its leading position in the industry in the following two years. With its then popularity, Imtoken soon closed its A-series funding led by IDG.
There seemed to be a consensus regarding the crypto wallet’s prevalent use and perceived significant role for the crypto industry. With such a strong consensus and the low market cap, it seemed terribly undervalued and thus good timing to invest in this sector.
Unfortunately, however, the market doesn’t respond the way we expected - wallet projects remain low of their market cap.
Let’s take a look at some funding info:
In June 2016, Imtoken raised angel investment from TISIWI capital, and later closed A round financing led by IDG.
In July 2016, Blockchain bagged 40 million dollars in series B funding.
In April 2018, TokenPocket raised several millions from angel investors.
In August 2018, Binance announced its acquisition of Trust Wallet.
In May 2020, Binance announced its investment in Safepal.
In December 2020, Math Wallet closed a 12-million series B funding led by Binance.
In November 2021, Coinbase acquired Breadwallet.
Before 2018, the funding of wallet projects was often led by VCs. After that, it was mainly provided by top centralized exchanges for investment or acquisition purposes.
The reason behind this is simple: with a fast-growing user base and capital influx in the crypto market, exchanges are becoming the absolute dominant players.
They are equipped with enough motivation to maintain or even strengthen their monopoly and abundant capital for investments.
At the same time, with the crypto space’s rapid development in the last few years, trading in the secondary market is no longer the only use case for the industry. With the invention of DEX, Defi, NFT, GameFi and SocialFi, users are no longer bound to do trading in central exchanges. They can opt to withdraw money to the blockchain and engage in different kinds of fun and profitable dApps or Defi products. Crypto wallets are the best tools and entry points for such growing demands.
Centralized exchanges will suffer from huge outflow of both users and assets if they don’t make any changes.
With such a strong motivation and their deep bankrolls, investment or acquisition is the most economic and efficient way for exchanges to cut into this sector. And wallet startups are the most suitable targets for their investment.
For wallet providers, who struggle to make profits, it's hard to turn down the offer for them to cash out.
Why is it so difficult for wallet businesses to make profits while they are so important in this industry?
I think the main reason is, while the business is called a “wallet”, they are in fact not closely related to the user's on-chain assets.
The revenue sources for exchanges are very straightforward: trading fees, listing fees, staking, market making, investments, financing, mining, etc. It’s quite easy for exchanges to gain profits, in ways we can or cannot imagine.
Centralized exchanges absorb and keep real users and assets. Users will utilize or invest their assets in the exchanges when presented with a chance to make money. When users are to make withdrawals, exchanges can delay or even refuse the withdrawals by means of delayed verification or account blockage. In essence, exchanges have authorities over their users’ assets.
Unlike exchanges, crypto wallets don't keep users’ assets. They only serve as a way to display the assets, but not storing them - all assets still stay “on-chain”. Wallets are more of only a tool for asset visualization or transfers. They have no means to prevent users from switching to other wallet providers or to intervene in users' asset transfers.
Users have relatively low barriers and maximum freedom over their assets in wallets, so they are not strongly tied to any wallet providers.
As for now, lots of wallet providers are working to solve this dilemma, taking actions including providing financing products, security solutions, and news services, serving ads or even starting hardware wallet business. But none of these efforts are truly profitable, or creating sustainable business advantages.
Many users prefer wallets over exchanges for two reasons: security and full control. It might be a mistake from the very beginning if wallet providers try to make profits from users’ assets the same way as exchanges do.
We tried to classify crypto users based on their trading preferences: traders, holders, and dApp users.
Traders trade frequently and value liquidity. They’d prefer to deposit assets in exchanges and be prepared to trade anytime.
Holders seldomly trade. They care most about security. Once they purchase an asset, holders will withdraw the assets into decentralized wallets or hardware wallets, not considering selling for a while. They also tend to purchase in large volumes.
DApp users, on the other hand, would like to embrace new applications and concepts, for example, Web3, Metaverse, DeFi, GameFi, NFT, or DAO fundraising and crowdfunding. They are active users of wallets.
These three types of users are not fixed; they can be interchangeable and may co-exist in one individual.
Judging from the direction of blockchain industry evolution, I believe with the improvement of blockchain performance, there will be an even richer dApp ecosystem, attracting more users to become dApp users. Although a considerable amount of users will probably still stay as traders for the foreseeable future, the growth trajectory of dApp users is self-explanatory.
As the entrance for users into the crypto world, wallet providers should explore how to serve the growing community of dApp users. Instead of user assets, they should focus on user behaviors, and explore how to serve use cases like web3 and metaverse.
There are quite a lot of unmet needs of the dApp users. To name a few, how to protect users from phishing dApps? How to detect suspicious authorization? How to avoid being misled by zero-width characters? How to visualize on-chain data? And all kinds of alerts, for example, for whale activities. There are still quite a few we haven't listed out yet. Wallet providers don’t have to provide all these functionalities; just striving to satisfy a focused few can help develop a closer bond with users and their assets.
In the long run, blockchain technology will eventually be prevalently adopted. Future dApps, regardless of which chain they are on, form the decentralized Web3 world for users to explore. At that stage, all chains are so secure and user-friendly enough that users won’t need to know which chain the dApps run on, nor will they care. They just need a convenient and integrated entrance into the world. The wallets could be the entrance.
Seeing from the future perspective, it might be inaccurate or even misleading to call the entrance a “wallet”.
Once I was in discussion with a friend in the wallet business, he argued that a wallet should be simple and straightford, only serving the single purpose of storing users’ assets. He maintained that a wallet startup should aim to become the “Alipay/Paypal” in the crypto industry.
It might be many people's stereotype that crypto wallets should be equivalent to “Alipay/Paypal”. However, it's very unlikely that the wallets will ever become such a thing - they serve different kinds of assets with different usages.
Users do need a wallet for crypto assets, but they need more than that. The current wallet is only a tool for on-chain asset display or transfers. While the wallet may be useful, it doesn't mean it is valuable.
The current business model of wallets, either as a backup wallet of exchange assets, or as a tool to display assets, won't bring attractive valuation to the business. Only when the “wallet” becomes the entrance into Web3, the business can have the potential to achieve as high a valuation as exchanges.
I can't yet think up a clear path of how wallets can become such an entrance. It might be:
Using the DID identity system, manage users’ wallet addresses across different chains using a unified identity.
As a safe and reliable entrance to explore the web3 world.
Build successful dapps through investment or incubation, and bring traffic into wallets through the dApps.
As the “App store” of dApps instead of an asset tool, satisfy users' diversified needs.
This remains an open question. If we continue to follow and research the development of the wallet industry, we may be able to identify good investment opportunities.
Original link：
用户需要的并仅仅是一个钱包，而是一个链上资产的显示和转账工具。
Translation：@Alex
Proofreading: @YaruiP
Layout：@Coucou
建设成为最有影响力和生产力的 Web3 人才与项目孵化器
No activity yet