The current state of Gnoland resembles a construction site. The official website is relatively simple. The simple reason is that this website is implemented with the back-end language Go, without the front-end framework React, so it is not surprising that it looks very geeky. From another perspective, their focus is not currently here, but the development itself. Some functions on the web page are designed to allow developers to participate in the interactive use of smart contracts.

In addition to its positioning, I think the biggest feature of the Gnoland project may be its governance, even extreme. The governance process has always been the focus of discussion, always focusing on fairness and efficiency, referring to various models, and weighing between centralization and decentralization, but in the end, tokens have the final say, and these tokens can be purchased, so the essence is There's nothing wrong with the money game.

Of course, this is also a bit out of tune with the real world, and there may be some challenges. For example, if governance tokens can be traded, they will essentially return to the financial level. Another point is that being a validator node is actually a professional field. Maintenance and security issues require professionals, and many contributors in Gnoland are not necessarily professionals in this area. This may also be a consideration for the security of subsequent nodes. question.

In terms of lowering the development threshold, there are actually quite a few similar positions to Gnoland. In addition to projects like Juno based on smart contracts, Evmos is also focusing on lowering the development threshold and finding more developer support. At this point, Gnoland still has its own challenges to face.

The current state of Gnoland resembles a construction site. The official website is relatively simple. The simple reason is that this website is implemented with the back-end language Go, without the front-end framework React, so it is not surprising that it looks very geeky. From another perspective, their focus is not currently here, but the development itself. Some functions on the web page are designed to allow developers to participate in the interactive use of smart contracts.

In addition to its positioning, I think the biggest feature of the Gnoland project may be its governance, even extreme. The governance process has always been the focus of discussion, always focusing on fairness and efficiency, referring to various models, and weighing between centralization and decentralization, but in the end, tokens have the final say, and these tokens can be purchased, so the essence is There's nothing wrong with the money game.

Of course, this is also a bit out of tune with the real world, and there may be some challenges. For example, if governance tokens can be traded, they will essentially return to the financial level. Another point is that being a validator node is actually a professional field. Maintenance and security issues require professionals, and many contributors in Gnoland are not necessarily professionals in this area. This may also be a consideration for the security of subsequent nodes. question.

In terms of lowering the development threshold, there are actually quite a few similar positions to Gnoland. In addition to projects like Juno based on smart contracts, Evmos is also focusing on lowering the development threshold and finding more developer support. At this point, Gnoland still has its own challenges to face.