The spirit within us is alight with telos. To build the divine, to become it.
The spirit within us is alight with telos. To build the divine, to become it.
![[object Object]](https://img.paragraph.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,width=256,quality=85/https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/1f9a2277b6658a368db9ef9c0a811fcb.jpg)
Subscribe to [object Object]
Subscribe to [object Object]
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
[object Object]Selfhosting behind a VPN
VPNs, tunneling, and paranoia
[object Object]Ethereum for Software Developers
On open APIs, composability, and the New Internet
[object Object]Phishing People on Discord with Fake Links
How you can make links that appear to be from one site but end up linking to another
[object Object]Selfhosting behind a VPN
VPNs, tunneling, and paranoia
[object Object]Ethereum for Software Developers
On open APIs, composability, and the New Internet
[object Object]Phishing People on Discord with Fake Links
How you can make links that appear to be from one site but end up linking to another
<100 subscribers
<100 subscribers
Originally thought about in the TLX Discord.
Currently, TLX leveraged tokens work by rebalancing to maintain a leverage within a range to avoid liquidations, which is what causes "volatility decay". It only rebalances after hitting the leverage bound (or on deposit and withdrawal) and also incurs swap fees.
Volatility decay would not be a factor if there were perfect rebalancing, i.e. maintaining a perfect constant leverage and having no swap fees.
My scheme: The synth aims to track a perfect constant-leverage index. People can borrow against collateral to mint these synths (let's say ETH2L) and short it by selling ETH2L. On the other side, people can long by buying ETH2L off the market.
Shorters get liquidation risk while longers don't, which could be an issue for getting people to mint in the first place, but they could be compensated by trading fees and fees on the token itself.
Originally thought about in the TLX Discord.
Currently, TLX leveraged tokens work by rebalancing to maintain a leverage within a range to avoid liquidations, which is what causes "volatility decay". It only rebalances after hitting the leverage bound (or on deposit and withdrawal) and also incurs swap fees.
Volatility decay would not be a factor if there were perfect rebalancing, i.e. maintaining a perfect constant leverage and having no swap fees.
My scheme: The synth aims to track a perfect constant-leverage index. People can borrow against collateral to mint these synths (let's say ETH2L) and short it by selling ETH2L. On the other side, people can long by buying ETH2L off the market.
Shorters get liquidation risk while longers don't, which could be an issue for getting people to mint in the first place, but they could be compensated by trading fees and fees on the token itself.
No activity yet