10 Analogies for Understanding Concepts in web3
These are 10 analogies for understanding concepts in web3.These analogies are far from perfect, but I’ve found them useful in explaining crypto to my friends trying to learn about the space for the first time. #1. NFTs: a regular baseball could be considered a fungible “token”. A non-fungible token (NFT) is akin to a baseball signed by Mickey Mantle. One is common, the other has a unique signature.#2. DAOs: imagine a non-profit, but organized by strangers on the internet with a united cause. ...
How to Retain Top Talent
Before I worked in venture capital, I worked at a firm called Boston Consulting Group. It’s full of great talent (in particular, high-slope young professionals), interesting work, and luxurious perks. Yet top consulting firms still experience really high rates of churn. I’ve spent a good part of the past few years thinking about why that is. More specifically, how to avoid the pitfalls that lead to high churn. One simple framework is to view the costs and benefits undertaken / enjoyed within ...

Public Goods in Crypto
The concept of public goods in crypto is pretty popular. It’s discussed a lot with regard to layer-1s, protocol treasuries, and ecosystem growth. The term has also begun to pop up in investment announcements. I find this last part especially interesting — prior to seeing firms “invest in public goods,” I had never really thought of public goods as an asset class. To be honest, I still don’t. It’s worth taking a step back and thinking about what actually constitutes a public good. Outside of c...
<100 subscribers
10 Analogies for Understanding Concepts in web3
These are 10 analogies for understanding concepts in web3.These analogies are far from perfect, but I’ve found them useful in explaining crypto to my friends trying to learn about the space for the first time. #1. NFTs: a regular baseball could be considered a fungible “token”. A non-fungible token (NFT) is akin to a baseball signed by Mickey Mantle. One is common, the other has a unique signature.#2. DAOs: imagine a non-profit, but organized by strangers on the internet with a united cause. ...
How to Retain Top Talent
Before I worked in venture capital, I worked at a firm called Boston Consulting Group. It’s full of great talent (in particular, high-slope young professionals), interesting work, and luxurious perks. Yet top consulting firms still experience really high rates of churn. I’ve spent a good part of the past few years thinking about why that is. More specifically, how to avoid the pitfalls that lead to high churn. One simple framework is to view the costs and benefits undertaken / enjoyed within ...

Public Goods in Crypto
The concept of public goods in crypto is pretty popular. It’s discussed a lot with regard to layer-1s, protocol treasuries, and ecosystem growth. The term has also begun to pop up in investment announcements. I find this last part especially interesting — prior to seeing firms “invest in public goods,” I had never really thought of public goods as an asset class. To be honest, I still don’t. It’s worth taking a step back and thinking about what actually constitutes a public good. Outside of c...
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Recently, I started building a habit of reading at least one Wikipedia page a day. It’s been a great way to learn about many random things — from bodegas, to Visa, to Wimbledon, to Dunkin Donuts, to where the term “chair” comes from, and much much more.
At first, it was a somewhat difficult habit to adopt. I’d ask myself “what should I wiki today?”, which felt forced and wasn’t the intent. But gradually it came more naturally. Walking down the street, I’d see something and wonder “can I wiki this?” Could be the subway, a storefront, a restaurant, anything really. If I didn’t know the history it was worth a quick wiki search.
I have a few friends at hedge funds who, through their work, have been trained to ask “is this public?” whenever they see a bustling restaurant or store. “Can I wiki this?” is my version of that — but instead of looking for an explicit financial opportunity, I’m trying to train my curiosity.
It’s worked surprisingly well. I’ve only been (actively) reading wiki pages for a few weeks, but I already feel more naturally curious. Not only have I learned a couple dozen new things — one wiki page a day for 3 weeks is 21 new topics! — but the habit has also trained me to constantly wonder what else might be worth knowing about a subject. Even now, looking around at my surroundings as I write this, some of the questions that come to mind are:
When was the first backpack created?
Why are QWERTY keyboards a thing?
How many types of coffee are there? And when was Folgers instant coffee first established?
How were zippers created?
How were headphone jacks invented? Was there a process for standardizing it across so many different types of devices? What drove that standard?
What makes reflective surfaces so reflective?
How were Command Strips invented? How long did it take for them to gain popularity?
I was planning to write more about how the world is really large, why natural and spontaneous curiosity is important in an age of information trained by algorithms, and how learning about many random things can help inspire and uncover interesting patterns. But writing the list above piqued my interest, so I think I might just go wiki some of those right now instead.
Recently, I started building a habit of reading at least one Wikipedia page a day. It’s been a great way to learn about many random things — from bodegas, to Visa, to Wimbledon, to Dunkin Donuts, to where the term “chair” comes from, and much much more.
At first, it was a somewhat difficult habit to adopt. I’d ask myself “what should I wiki today?”, which felt forced and wasn’t the intent. But gradually it came more naturally. Walking down the street, I’d see something and wonder “can I wiki this?” Could be the subway, a storefront, a restaurant, anything really. If I didn’t know the history it was worth a quick wiki search.
I have a few friends at hedge funds who, through their work, have been trained to ask “is this public?” whenever they see a bustling restaurant or store. “Can I wiki this?” is my version of that — but instead of looking for an explicit financial opportunity, I’m trying to train my curiosity.
It’s worked surprisingly well. I’ve only been (actively) reading wiki pages for a few weeks, but I already feel more naturally curious. Not only have I learned a couple dozen new things — one wiki page a day for 3 weeks is 21 new topics! — but the habit has also trained me to constantly wonder what else might be worth knowing about a subject. Even now, looking around at my surroundings as I write this, some of the questions that come to mind are:
When was the first backpack created?
Why are QWERTY keyboards a thing?
How many types of coffee are there? And when was Folgers instant coffee first established?
How were zippers created?
How were headphone jacks invented? Was there a process for standardizing it across so many different types of devices? What drove that standard?
What makes reflective surfaces so reflective?
How were Command Strips invented? How long did it take for them to gain popularity?
I was planning to write more about how the world is really large, why natural and spontaneous curiosity is important in an age of information trained by algorithms, and how learning about many random things can help inspire and uncover interesting patterns. But writing the list above piqued my interest, so I think I might just go wiki some of those right now instead.
No comments yet