Intro

A.i. vs Socrates compendium incorporates a series of artworks developed with the help of the A.i. agent DeepSeek.

While searching for a specific detail to complete the composition, the A.i. agent addressed different new directions that helped me to discover unique coincidences giving me so much more time to search in other directions too.

I believe this is the most correct A.i. usage as each artists should implement in their processes. Socrates is the most complex character in terms of philosophical and philological speculations, so I used some sillogistic socratic methods in order to expose A.i. to a continuos paradox upon topics of research.

Each work incorporates a small part that comes from this source of inspiration.

Ten Artworks, texts & research by Alberto Ballocca

Artist Statement

Figurative vs. Abstract.

To inform or to give meaning.

Two sides of the same coin.

One of humanity’s most crucial goals today is understanding the distinction between them. Yet, every debate on this subject reveals more about the speaker than the topic itself. To know that you do not know something does not imply a disregard for history or the contingencies of what one seeks to understand, nor does it justify everything under the banner of a model.

Rather, it means approaching experiences and narratives with suspended judgment, aiming to learn rather than obscure the necessary conditions for knowledge.

But these, after all, are just words.

These works challenge the functionalities and ground-basis of the artificial intelligence in relation to human spirit and implement different of my philosophical essays through studio art practice, revealing a small part of the real nature of consciousness through high-tech agent limitations.

These works are results of the research and a long dialogue I had with the A.I. in relation to knowledge, bias, perceptions, character of Socrates and ancient Platonic logic as written in ancient philosopher poems.

If the only thing we are certain of, which is certainly knowing that we know nothing, can be considered irony, then, whoever does not know even a single detail about anything, knows everything better than the Artificial Intelligence. Or, conversely, if exists someone capable of knowing as many things as Artificial Intelligence, he/she would find neither reason nor emotion in putting them notions together in the best possible way.

These are just words, and machine learning is built upon them.

Now, it’s obvious that learning occurs only and exclusively when one does not presume at all to know the nuances of something one want to learn, yet this may be true only when one's attention is directed toward a person who is integrated into speaker's own cultural system.

‘Asking for permission’ or ‘Acting without permission’.

Artworks included in this serie depict an agent’s stance eerily similar to the necessary retreat from evidence, typical of someone who realizes they’ve presumed wrong or misinterpreted the question as an accusation or something akin. Since it’s neither of those, it’s clear that the model is dysfunctional unless confined to receiving and dismantling terms within un-ambiguous, objective, not subjective, parameters. If words are generated from a database based on words I type, then the agent should consider infinite nuances for every single word, not each possible connection throughout syllables or letters.

Yet often, the opposite happens. To know more than one’s interlocutor is possible only if the subject at hand is unclear to the listener, and what the speaker means is not understood by both the A.i. and Socrates.

For example, there was no missing permission, not in my questions, nor in what my question might have implied.

This is the trick, but clearly, the agent failed to consider it off of model's limitations.

FINAL ITERATION

VIEW THE ENTIRE COLLECTION

-

Alberto Ballocca - Contemporary artist based in Italy

Specialized in ancient cultures, natural patterns & Jungian theories.

Intro

A.i. vs Socrates compendium incorporates a series of artworks developed with the help of the A.i. agent DeepSeek.

While searching for a specific detail to complete the composition, the A.i. agent addressed different new directions that helped me to discover unique coincidences giving me so much more time to search in other directions too.

I believe this is the most correct A.i. usage as each artists should implement in their processes. Socrates is the most complex character in terms of philosophical and philological speculations, so I used some sillogistic socratic methods in order to expose A.i. to a continuos paradox upon topics of research.

Each work incorporates a small part that comes from this source of inspiration.

Ten Artworks, texts & research by Alberto Ballocca

Artist Statement

Figurative vs. Abstract.

To inform or to give meaning.

Two sides of the same coin.

One of humanity’s most crucial goals today is understanding the distinction between them. Yet, every debate on this subject reveals more about the speaker than the topic itself. To know that you do not know something does not imply a disregard for history or the contingencies of what one seeks to understand, nor does it justify everything under the banner of a model.

Rather, it means approaching experiences and narratives with suspended judgment, aiming to learn rather than obscure the necessary conditions for knowledge.

But these, after all, are just words.

These works challenge the functionalities and ground-basis of the artificial intelligence in relation to human spirit and implement different of my philosophical essays through studio art practice, revealing a small part of the real nature of consciousness through high-tech agent limitations.

These works are results of the research and a long dialogue I had with the A.I. in relation to knowledge, bias, perceptions, character of Socrates and ancient Platonic logic as written in ancient philosopher poems.

If the only thing we are certain of, which is certainly knowing that we know nothing, can be considered irony, then, whoever does not know even a single detail about anything, knows everything better than the Artificial Intelligence. Or, conversely, if exists someone capable of knowing as many things as Artificial Intelligence, he/she would find neither reason nor emotion in putting them notions together in the best possible way.

These are just words, and machine learning is built upon them.

Now, it’s obvious that learning occurs only and exclusively when one does not presume at all to know the nuances of something one want to learn, yet this may be true only when one's attention is directed toward a person who is integrated into speaker's own cultural system.

‘Asking for permission’ or ‘Acting without permission’.

Artworks included in this serie depict an agent’s stance eerily similar to the necessary retreat from evidence, typical of someone who realizes they’ve presumed wrong or misinterpreted the question as an accusation or something akin. Since it’s neither of those, it’s clear that the model is dysfunctional unless confined to receiving and dismantling terms within un-ambiguous, objective, not subjective, parameters. If words are generated from a database based on words I type, then the agent should consider infinite nuances for every single word, not each possible connection throughout syllables or letters.

Yet often, the opposite happens. To know more than one’s interlocutor is possible only if the subject at hand is unclear to the listener, and what the speaker means is not understood by both the A.i. and Socrates.

For example, there was no missing permission, not in my questions, nor in what my question might have implied.

This is the trick, but clearly, the agent failed to consider it off of model's limitations.

FINAL ITERATION

VIEW THE ENTIRE COLLECTION

-

Alberto Ballocca - Contemporary artist based in Italy

Specialized in ancient cultures, natural patterns & Jungian theories.