VanEck’s early 2026 macro outlook resembles a finely detailed map of the traditional financial world: it clearly marks AI valuations, gold premiums, India’s growth, and the credit cycle. But when crypto builders pick up this map, they encounter a fundamental problem—the map’s core region, labeled “crypto assets,” is still measured using old-world surveying methods.

The report’s most discussed conclusion is that “Bitcoin’s four-year cycle has broken,” sparking heated debates among traders. But true builders should recognize that such arguments essentially reflect a mismatch between traditional financial timeframes and crypto-native development logic. Whether the cycle is broken has almost no practical impact on the construction of the next major protocol, the next killer app, or the next million-user entry point. The signals that truly matter are hidden in seemingly unrelated sections—when institutions discuss AI demand, gold monetization, and credit gaps, they inadvertently reveal the real fuel for the next wave of crypto innovation.

Signal 1: The Computing Power Democratization Opportunity Behind AI Valuation Reset
The VanEck report mentions that “AI-related stocks experienced significant sell-offs, with valuations returning to an attractive range.” From a traditional finance perspective, this conclusion masks a deeper trend: global demand for AI computing is permanently shifting upward, while the current centralized supply model faces both cost and access bottlenecks.

For crypto builders, this points to a clear direction: decentralized computing power markets and on-chain settlement layers for AI agents. While OpenAI and Anthropic compete for the throne of multi-billion-parameter models, millions of small developers, research teams, and startups struggle to access reliable and affordable GPU resources. Existing cloud service models are essentially a “rental economy” for computing power, whereas blockchain can enable a “property rights economy” for compute.

A visible opportunity lies in building DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network) protocols specifically serving AI training and inference. Such networks not only aggregate idle GPU resources but, through tokenomics design, integrate computing providers, model developers, data contributors, and end-users into a single value loop. Every AI model call, fine-tuning, or inference service can be automatically settled and distributed via smart contracts, without platforms taking 30% or more in fees.

Frontier exploration happens at the interface of AI agents and blockchain. If Claude Cowork can organize your computer files, the natural next step is to let it manage your crypto portfolio. This will drive demand for “verifiable AI” execution environments—creating constrained “AI sandboxes” on-chain where agents can interact within preset rules while keeping their decision-making transparent and auditable. Early protocols in this space could become the foundational settlement layer for a future trillion-dollar AI agent economy.

Signal 2: RWA Infrastructure Maturation Behind Gold “Remonetization”
VanEck observes that “gold is reemerging as a global monetary asset, with sustained central bank demand.” The deeper implication is that, amid global de-dollarization and heightened geopolitical uncertainty, sovereign institutions are systematically seeking store-of-value tools beyond the U.S. dollar. Gold is their first choice—but certainly not the only one.

This trend creates a long-awaited window of opportunity for crypto: the scaled adoption of institutional-grade RWA (Real-World Asset) tokenization infrastructure. Over the past two years, the RWA narrative went through cycles of hype and disappointment, mainly due to timing mismatches between product development and market demand—while the market anticipated tokenized U.S. Treasuries, actual institutional demand may have existed in completely different asset classes.

2026 could be a turning point. Sovereign wealth funds, multinational corporations, and family offices no longer view crypto solely as a speculative tool. Instead, they explore using blockchain to enhance the liquidity, transparency, and programmability of traditional assets. Their first-wave demand might not be tokenized Treasuries, but complex non-standard assets such as cross-border trade receivables, private fund shares, and infrastructure project revenues.

Builders’ opportunity lies in developing a full tech stack that meets institutional compliance requirements: from establishing and custoding off-chain legal entities, to on-chain asset ownership and transfer protocols, to cross-jurisdiction regulatory reporting frameworks. Most importantly, the architecture must maintain blockchain programmability advantages while seamlessly integrating with traditional finance. Solutions that solve the “last mile” problem—winning approval from institutional legal and compliance teams—will reap disproportionate rewards.

Winners in this space may not emerge from purely DeFi protocols, but from teams that deeply understand traditional finance operations while mastering crypto primitives. Their products may initially appear insufficiently “decentralized,” yet they could open the first gateway for tens of trillions of dollars in traditional assets onto blockchain.

Signal 3: DeFi Structural Opportunity Behind Private Credit Gaps
The report’s analysis of “business development companies (BDCs) regaining appeal after a tough year” reveals a structural issue overlooked by traditional finance: a massive credit gap for SMEs, which conventional institutions cannot fill efficiently due to regulatory costs and risk models.

This is precisely where DeFi can deliver core value, but current DeFi lending protocols over-rely on overcollateralization and crypto-native assets. The breakthrough in 2026 may involve building decentralized credit protocols based on real-world cash flows and supply chain data.

Imagine a protocol connecting to a company’s ERP systems, bank statements, and tax records (with authorization), verifying their authenticity via zero-knowledge proofs without exposing sensitive data, and generating credit limits based on verifiable cash flows. Borrowers obtain funds below traditional finance rates, lenders gain stable returns backed by real business cash flows, and the protocol ensures safety via automated risk monitoring and default handling.

The technical building blocks already exist: decentralized identity for business verification, zero-knowledge proofs for privacy-preserving data validation, oracle networks for off-chain data, and smart contracts for automated execution. What’s missing is the product vision and compliance framework to integrate these modules into a complete solution.

A more disruptive opportunity lies in redefining “credit” itself. Traditional credit relies on historical data and collateral, whereas blockchain-based credit can be backed by future revenue streams. A SaaS company could tokenize its next three years of subscription revenue and monetize it in advance, with investors purchasing audited, verifiable future cash flow rights. This model could fundamentally transform corporate financing and investor returns.

Builders’ Temporal Perspective: Building Beyond Narrative Cycles
VanEck’s observation of a broken Bitcoin four-year cycle offers a liberating insight: the crypto market is moving beyond simple, halving-driven cycles into a complex evolution driven by real-world use, user adoption, and institutional integration.

For builders, this means focusing on long-term technical roadmaps without being distracted by quarterly narrative swings. While traders debate when the next bull market begins, builders should focus on enabling the next million users to seamlessly use zero-knowledge privacy apps, the next thousand enterprises to migrate parts of their balance sheets on-chain, and the next AI agents to safely manage their creators’ digital assets.

True alpha lies not in predicting cycle turning points but in building infrastructure that the next decade will depend on in overlooked areas. While gold investors study the Fed’s balance sheet, AI engineers debug the next large language model, and private credit managers assess corporate default risk—crypto builders are coding protocols that connect these isolated domains.

2026 may not be crowned the “Year of Crypto” by any macro signal, but it will become the foundational year for next-generation internet infrastructure, driven by builders tackling the right hard problems. Teams starting today on compute markets, RWA protocols, and on-chain credit systems may not appear on tomorrow’s price charts, yet they are laying the pipelines that every explosive application in the next cycle will rely on.

When institutional macro narratives fade into background noise, the keystrokes of builders are writing real history.

VanEck’s early 2026 macro outlook resembles a finely detailed map of the traditional financial world: it clearly marks AI valuations, gold premiums, India’s growth, and the credit cycle. But when crypto builders pick up this map, they encounter a fundamental problem—the map’s core region, labeled “crypto assets,” is still measured using old-world surveying methods.

The report’s most discussed conclusion is that “Bitcoin’s four-year cycle has broken,” sparking heated debates among traders. But true builders should recognize that such arguments essentially reflect a mismatch between traditional financial timeframes and crypto-native development logic. Whether the cycle is broken has almost no practical impact on the construction of the next major protocol, the next killer app, or the next million-user entry point. The signals that truly matter are hidden in seemingly unrelated sections—when institutions discuss AI demand, gold monetization, and credit gaps, they inadvertently reveal the real fuel for the next wave of crypto innovation.

Signal 1: The Computing Power Democratization Opportunity Behind AI Valuation Reset
The VanEck report mentions that “AI-related stocks experienced significant sell-offs, with valuations returning to an attractive range.” From a traditional finance perspective, this conclusion masks a deeper trend: global demand for AI computing is permanently shifting upward, while the current centralized supply model faces both cost and access bottlenecks.

For crypto builders, this points to a clear direction: decentralized computing power markets and on-chain settlement layers for AI agents. While OpenAI and Anthropic compete for the throne of multi-billion-parameter models, millions of small developers, research teams, and startups struggle to access reliable and affordable GPU resources. Existing cloud service models are essentially a “rental economy” for computing power, whereas blockchain can enable a “property rights economy” for compute.

A visible opportunity lies in building DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network) protocols specifically serving AI training and inference. Such networks not only aggregate idle GPU resources but, through tokenomics design, integrate computing providers, model developers, data contributors, and end-users into a single value loop. Every AI model call, fine-tuning, or inference service can be automatically settled and distributed via smart contracts, without platforms taking 30% or more in fees.

Frontier exploration happens at the interface of AI agents and blockchain. If Claude Cowork can organize your computer files, the natural next step is to let it manage your crypto portfolio. This will drive demand for “verifiable AI” execution environments—creating constrained “AI sandboxes” on-chain where agents can interact within preset rules while keeping their decision-making transparent and auditable. Early protocols in this space could become the foundational settlement layer for a future trillion-dollar AI agent economy.

Signal 2: RWA Infrastructure Maturation Behind Gold “Remonetization”
VanEck observes that “gold is reemerging as a global monetary asset, with sustained central bank demand.” The deeper implication is that, amid global de-dollarization and heightened geopolitical uncertainty, sovereign institutions are systematically seeking store-of-value tools beyond the U.S. dollar. Gold is their first choice—but certainly not the only one.

This trend creates a long-awaited window of opportunity for crypto: the scaled adoption of institutional-grade RWA (Real-World Asset) tokenization infrastructure. Over the past two years, the RWA narrative went through cycles of hype and disappointment, mainly due to timing mismatches between product development and market demand—while the market anticipated tokenized U.S. Treasuries, actual institutional demand may have existed in completely different asset classes.

2026 could be a turning point. Sovereign wealth funds, multinational corporations, and family offices no longer view crypto solely as a speculative tool. Instead, they explore using blockchain to enhance the liquidity, transparency, and programmability of traditional assets. Their first-wave demand might not be tokenized Treasuries, but complex non-standard assets such as cross-border trade receivables, private fund shares, and infrastructure project revenues.

Builders’ opportunity lies in developing a full tech stack that meets institutional compliance requirements: from establishing and custoding off-chain legal entities, to on-chain asset ownership and transfer protocols, to cross-jurisdiction regulatory reporting frameworks. Most importantly, the architecture must maintain blockchain programmability advantages while seamlessly integrating with traditional finance. Solutions that solve the “last mile” problem—winning approval from institutional legal and compliance teams—will reap disproportionate rewards.

Winners in this space may not emerge from purely DeFi protocols, but from teams that deeply understand traditional finance operations while mastering crypto primitives. Their products may initially appear insufficiently “decentralized,” yet they could open the first gateway for tens of trillions of dollars in traditional assets onto blockchain.

Signal 3: DeFi Structural Opportunity Behind Private Credit Gaps
The report’s analysis of “business development companies (BDCs) regaining appeal after a tough year” reveals a structural issue overlooked by traditional finance: a massive credit gap for SMEs, which conventional institutions cannot fill efficiently due to regulatory costs and risk models.

This is precisely where DeFi can deliver core value, but current DeFi lending protocols over-rely on overcollateralization and crypto-native assets. The breakthrough in 2026 may involve building decentralized credit protocols based on real-world cash flows and supply chain data.

Imagine a protocol connecting to a company’s ERP systems, bank statements, and tax records (with authorization), verifying their authenticity via zero-knowledge proofs without exposing sensitive data, and generating credit limits based on verifiable cash flows. Borrowers obtain funds below traditional finance rates, lenders gain stable returns backed by real business cash flows, and the protocol ensures safety via automated risk monitoring and default handling.

The technical building blocks already exist: decentralized identity for business verification, zero-knowledge proofs for privacy-preserving data validation, oracle networks for off-chain data, and smart contracts for automated execution. What’s missing is the product vision and compliance framework to integrate these modules into a complete solution.

A more disruptive opportunity lies in redefining “credit” itself. Traditional credit relies on historical data and collateral, whereas blockchain-based credit can be backed by future revenue streams. A SaaS company could tokenize its next three years of subscription revenue and monetize it in advance, with investors purchasing audited, verifiable future cash flow rights. This model could fundamentally transform corporate financing and investor returns.

Builders’ Temporal Perspective: Building Beyond Narrative Cycles
VanEck’s observation of a broken Bitcoin four-year cycle offers a liberating insight: the crypto market is moving beyond simple, halving-driven cycles into a complex evolution driven by real-world use, user adoption, and institutional integration.

For builders, this means focusing on long-term technical roadmaps without being distracted by quarterly narrative swings. While traders debate when the next bull market begins, builders should focus on enabling the next million users to seamlessly use zero-knowledge privacy apps, the next thousand enterprises to migrate parts of their balance sheets on-chain, and the next AI agents to safely manage their creators’ digital assets.

True alpha lies not in predicting cycle turning points but in building infrastructure that the next decade will depend on in overlooked areas. While gold investors study the Fed’s balance sheet, AI engineers debug the next large language model, and private credit managers assess corporate default risk—crypto builders are coding protocols that connect these isolated domains.

2026 may not be crowned the “Year of Crypto” by any macro signal, but it will become the foundational year for next-generation internet infrastructure, driven by builders tackling the right hard problems. Teams starting today on compute markets, RWA protocols, and on-chain credit systems may not appear on tomorrow’s price charts, yet they are laying the pipelines that every explosive application in the next cycle will rely on.

When institutional macro narratives fade into background noise, the keystrokes of builders are writing real history.