Subscribe to Artem Teplov | Technical Content Architect
<100 subscribers
Let’s stop pretending. The current state of many "decentralized" projects is a farce. We build sophisticated L1/L2 networks, talk about decentralization, but then run our data validation on AWS Lambda or Google Cloud Functions.
This is what I call "Settlement Theater." You are using a blockchain to record data that has already been processed in a centralized black box. If Amazon decides to tweak your vehicle telemetry or censor your sensor data before it hits the chain, your "immutable ledger" is just recording a lie.
Author’s Insight: "If your DePIN project relies on a centralized API to prove that work was done, you don't have a decentralized network — you have a glorified database with an expensive transaction log. For a machine economy to work, the 'proof' must be generated where the data is born, not where a cloud provider allows it to be processed."
Centralized clouds operate on a reputation-based trust model. We trust them because they are big. But in a multi-trillion dollar machine-to-machine economy, reputation isn't enough. We need Verifiable Truth.
IoTeX’s W3bstream is the first architecture that breaks this dependency. It’s not just an off-chain compute layer; it’s a Verifiable Compute Layer. It ensures that the path from a Tesla’s odometer or a GEODNET station to the smart contract is cryptographically sealed.
Author’s Insight: "The industry is currently facing a structural contradiction. We are trying to build the future of infrastructure on the very tools (AWS/GCP) that we are trying to replace. W3bstream is the 'exit ramp' from this paradox. It’s the difference between asking for permission from a tech giant and proving reality through math."
Most DePIN projects today are built on a lie. They claim to be decentralized, but their data pipeline is a catastrophic failure of logic: Sensor → TLS Tunnel → AWS Lambda (The Black Box) → Blockchain.
The "Middle" is completely opaque. Between your hardware and the ledger sits a proprietary VM in an Amazon datacenter. It lacks any cryptographic proof of integrity. You aren't trusting math; you are trusting a corporate giant not to tamper with your telemetry.
Author’s Insight: "If an AWS employee or a state actor decides to 'tweak' your vehicle's mileage data in a Lambda function, no one will ever know. The blockchain will faithfully record that lie as 'Truth.' This isn't DePIN; it's a glorified database with an expensive transaction log. We are building the future of infrastructure on the very 'Trust Me' models we set out to destroy."
AWS markets Nitro Enclaves as the ultimate isolation. Let's look at the engineering reality. It fails all four criteria of trustless compute:
Root of Trust: Controlled by AWS. The attestation is signed by Amazon's private key. If they want to fake it, they can.
Reproducible Builds: Zero. You cannot independently verify that the code running in the cloud matches your source.
Hardware Independence: None. You are at the mercy of AMD/Intel firmware backdoors and AWS hypervisors.
Author’s Insight: "Nitro Enclaves are like a safe where the manufacturer (Amazon) keeps a master key and refuses to let you see the blueprints. It protects you from your 'neighbor' in the datacenter, but it provides zero protection against the landlord. In a truly sovereign machine economy, there is no place for a landlord."
Beyond the security risks, there is the brutal reality of the AWS Tax. Centralized providers scale linearly with your success—meaning the more your DePIN grows, the more you owe Jeff Bezos.
AWS Costs (1M Sensors): ~$8,900/month (Invocations, storage, egress fees).
W3bstream Equivalent: ~$1,200/month (Self-hosted nodes, modular scaling).
The Result: An 86% cost reduction combined with cryptographic certainty.
Author’s Insight: "Centralized clouds are optimized for 'utilization-maximization' — they want you locked into their proprietary APIs and egress fees. W3bstream is optimized for 'verification-maximization.' We aren't just saving money; we are buying immunity from corporate and regulatory capture."
W3bstream does more than just process data; it creates a digital lineage for it. The architecture is divided into three echelons, where each layer cryptographically validates the integrity of the previous one:
Layer 1 (Origination): Data is born inside ioID and hardware TEEs (Trusted Execution Environments). This is the hardware root of trust.
Layer 2 (Compute): The WebAssembly (Wasm) runtime environment. Here, raw metrics are transformed into outcomes (e.g., calculating an insurance risk score), and a ZK-proof is generated simultaneously.
Layer 3 (Settlement): A smart contract on the IoTeX blockchain that verifies the proof in milliseconds and finalizes the result.
Author’s Insight: "In traditional IoT, data is a 'promise.' In W3bstream, data is a 'proof.' We utilize ATECC608-grade chips to lock private keys directly into the silicon. You cannot extract them; you cannot forge them. This is the bedrock upon which the entire DePIN skyscraper is built."
The fatal flaw of traditional cloud computing is non-determinism. The same code running on different servers can yield different results due to system calls, memory states, or clock drift. W3bstream utilizes a Wasm Runtime that is completely isolated:
No System Calls: Zero access to the network or local file systems.
Metered Execution: Every instruction costs "gas," eliminating the risk of infinite loops.
Canonical Serialization: Data is always packed identically across all nodes.
Author’s Insight: "Determinism is the Holy Grail of ZK-computing. Without it, generating a proof that confirms the correctness of code execution is impossible. We transform chaotic telemetry streams into an ordered mathematical sequence that any node in the network can verify."
W3bstream is not a rigid cage; it is a Swiss Army knife. Developers can select their specific proof system (Prover) based on their unique requirements:
Halo2 (PLONK): Fast and compact (proofs are only 3-5 KB). Ideal for simple logic, but vulnerable to future quantum attacks.
Risc0 (STARK): The heavyweight champion. While the proofs are larger, they are quantum-resistant (hash-based). This is exactly what Dr. Xinxin Fan advocates for: infrastructure protection for decades to come.
Author’s Insight: "Choosing a prover is always a trade-off between gas costs and security. Integrating Risc0 into the W3bstream pipeline is a direct insurance policy against the 'quantum apocalypse.' When Google Willow becomes a daily reality, projects built on Halo2 will face forced migrations and downtime, while IoTeX-based STARK projects will continue to operate as if nothing happened."
On December 9, 2024, the world changed. Google unveiled Willow—a 105-qubit quantum processor capable of solving problems in 5 minutes that would take a classical supercomputer 10 septillion years.
For DePIN, this is a death sentence. Modern blockchains (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana) rely on the secp256k1 curve. A cryptographically relevant quantum computer will shatter these keys in hours.
Author’s Insight: "If you are building a DePIN network for autonomous mobility or smart grids using standard ECDSA signatures, you are building a house of cards. The 'Store Now, Decrypt Later' attack is already active: state actors are harvesting your data today to decrypt it tomorrow. IoTeX is the only project deploying a bunker right now."
IoTeX Chief Cryptographer, Dr. Xinxin Fan (recipient of the IEEE ICBC 2024 Best Paper Award), has engineered the transition framework for the post-quantum era. His solution: the Hybrid Signature Scheme.
This acts as a "double lock": data is signed simultaneously by a classical ECDSA and a post-quantum lattice-based algorithm (like Dilithium).
Today: Both layers operate for backward compatibility.
Tomorrow: When quantum computing breaks ECDSA, the network simply discards the legacy layer and shifts entirely to Dilithium.
Dr. Fan’s research proves that ZK-proof systems like Halo2 or Groth16 are useless against quantum threats because they are built on elliptic curve pairings.
W3bstream bets on ZK-STARKs. These are founded on collision-resistant hash functions (Poseidon, Rescue). Hashing is inherently resistant to Shor’s algorithm.
Halo2 Quantum Security: 0 bits (Fully broken).
W3bstream STARK Security: 128-256 bits (Total protection).
Author’s Insight: "Using Halo2 in 2025 for critical infrastructure is professional negligence. W3bstream utilizes STARKs not just for speed, but for data sovereignty in the age of quantum supremacy. We aren't just processing data; we are making it immutable for eternity."
How do you verify 2.4 billion proofs from 100 million vehicles daily? On a standard blockchain, the gas costs would exceed $300 billion per day.
Dr. Fan’s breakthrough is Recursive STARK Composition:
1,000 proofs are compressed into a single "Meta-Proof."
1,000 "Meta-Proofs" are aggregated into a "Grand-Proof."
A single final proof is settled on-chain, verifying a billion transactions for $0.50 instead of billions of dollars.
The current DePIN landscape is a "fragmented mess." Projects like Helium, Hivemapper, and DIMO are forced to build redundant infrastructure—their own L1s, oracle networks, and security stacks. This burns millions in capital and creates data silos. A vehicle on DIMO cannot natively talk to a Helium MOBILE node.
IoTeX 2.0 solves this through Modularity.
IoTeX introduces Modular Security Pools (MSP). Instead of bootstrapping 100 validators from scratch, new DePIN projects "rent" security from the IoTeX L1.
Layer 1 (Settlement): IOTX stakers provide a $500M+ security umbrella.
MSP Layer: Projects join specific vertical pools (Mobility, Energy, Mapping).
W3bstream (Compute): A unified, off-chain compute hub serving all pools simultaneously.
Author’s Insight: "This is the 'Uber model' for blockchain. You don't need to own the fleet (the L1) to run a taxi service. You plug into the IoTeX infrastructure and pay only for what you use. This slashes Time-to-Market from 2 years to 2 months."
Through the ioID standard, a device becomes a universal citizen. Your electric vehicle can simultaneously:
Earn in the Mobility MSP for mileage.
Earn in the Energy MSP for vehicle-to-grid (V2G) power balancing.
Earn in the Mapping MSP for providing dashcam telemetry.
While standalone projects spend millions on maintenance, an MSP-based project shares costs. W3bstream amortizes the cost of ZK-proof generation across the entire ecosystem.
Author’s Insight: "Launching on IoTeX MSP shifts DePIN from CapEx to OpEx. Instead of raising millions for software development, you spend cents on ZK-proofs. It’s the economics of common sense."
The Decentralized Physical Infrastructure (DePIN) movement has reached a critical inflection point. The first wave proved market demand (Helium); the second wave proved device scalability (Hivemapper). However, the third wave—globally composable and quantum-resistant DePIN—cannot be built on legacy foundations:
AWS/Google Cloud: These are cryptographically bankrupt. Trusting "Confidential Computing" is merely trusting a corporation's promise, not mathematical certainty.
Legacy DePIN L1s: Custom blockchains where every project "reinvents the wheel" lead to fragmented liquidity and bloated security audit budgets.
W3bstream + IoTeX MSP is the only stack providing ZK-STARK verification, Dr. Fan’s post-quantum security framework, and modular economics that are 10x more cost-effective than custom-built solutions.
Google’s Willow processor has accelerated the timeline toward the "cryptographic singularity." The "Store now, decrypt later" attack is no longer a theory—it is a present reality. Data harvested today will be compromised by 2030. Only hash-based cryptography, the foundation of W3bstream’s STARK implementation, ensures long-term data integrity.
Author’s Insight: "Ignoring the quantum threat in 2025 is equivalent to building critical infrastructure with a pre-installed time bomb. IoTeX provides the only viable 'bunker' for the machine economy."
The future of DePIN is not a thousand isolated L1 blockchains, but Modular Security Pools (MSP) anchored to a battle-tested settlement layer.
Hivemapper should focus on mapping, not maintaining a blockchain.
DIMO should focus on data marketplaces, not building proof systems.
By inheriting security and identity from IoTeX, projects can launch in 6 weeks instead of 2 years. This is the economics of common sense: transitioning from CapEx-heavy infrastructure to OpEx-efficient modularity.
For DePIN Founders: Evaluate the true cost of your custom L1 against an MSP deployment. If you don't embrace modularity, you will be outcompeted on costs and security.
For Hardware Manufacturers: Integrate ioID (Secure Element) now. Without a hardware-rooted identity, your devices will become obsolete the moment quantum computers break software authentication.
For Blockchain Developers: Study Dr. Fan’s ICBC 2024 award-winning research. Transition to STARKs and hash-based signatures (Dilithium) before the threat forces an emergency migration under adversarial conditions.
The infrastructure standard is not AWS. The infrastructure standard is not Ethereum. The infrastructure standard is W3bstream.
Document Classification: Strategic Infrastructure Research Technical References:
Dr. Xinxin Fan, "Post-Quantum Cryptographic Transitions for Smart Contract Platforms," IEEE ICBC 2024.
NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (ML-KEM, ML-DSA).
Google Quantum AI, "Willow: Quantum Error Correction Below Threshold," Dec 2024.
About the Author
Artem Teplov is a Technical Protocol Architect and Infrastructure Analyst based in Los Angeles, CA. He specializes in high-fidelity Whitepaper development, Protocol Gap Analysis, and the architectural auditing of complex DeFi and DePIN ecosystems. Artem’s work focuses on the intersection of computational physics, tokenomic sustainability, and risk mitigation for next-generation decentralized networks.
Strategic Inquiries & Protocol Audits: If your project requires a rigorous technical deep-dive or a standard-setting Whitepaper, let’s connect.
Farcaster: @artemteplov
X (Twitter): @Teplov_AG
Author’s Note: If you find this technical analysis valuable, please consider supporting my work. Your engagement is the fuel that drives these deep-dives into the future of the machine economy. Thank you!
Let’s stop pretending. The current state of many "decentralized" projects is a farce. We build sophisticated L1/L2 networks, talk about decentralization, but then run our data validation on AWS Lambda or Google Cloud Functions.
This is what I call "Settlement Theater." You are using a blockchain to record data that has already been processed in a centralized black box. If Amazon decides to tweak your vehicle telemetry or censor your sensor data before it hits the chain, your "immutable ledger" is just recording a lie.
Author’s Insight: "If your DePIN project relies on a centralized API to prove that work was done, you don't have a decentralized network — you have a glorified database with an expensive transaction log. For a machine economy to work, the 'proof' must be generated where the data is born, not where a cloud provider allows it to be processed."
Centralized clouds operate on a reputation-based trust model. We trust them because they are big. But in a multi-trillion dollar machine-to-machine economy, reputation isn't enough. We need Verifiable Truth.
IoTeX’s W3bstream is the first architecture that breaks this dependency. It’s not just an off-chain compute layer; it’s a Verifiable Compute Layer. It ensures that the path from a Tesla’s odometer or a GEODNET station to the smart contract is cryptographically sealed.
Author’s Insight: "The industry is currently facing a structural contradiction. We are trying to build the future of infrastructure on the very tools (AWS/GCP) that we are trying to replace. W3bstream is the 'exit ramp' from this paradox. It’s the difference between asking for permission from a tech giant and proving reality through math."
Most DePIN projects today are built on a lie. They claim to be decentralized, but their data pipeline is a catastrophic failure of logic: Sensor → TLS Tunnel → AWS Lambda (The Black Box) → Blockchain.
The "Middle" is completely opaque. Between your hardware and the ledger sits a proprietary VM in an Amazon datacenter. It lacks any cryptographic proof of integrity. You aren't trusting math; you are trusting a corporate giant not to tamper with your telemetry.
Author’s Insight: "If an AWS employee or a state actor decides to 'tweak' your vehicle's mileage data in a Lambda function, no one will ever know. The blockchain will faithfully record that lie as 'Truth.' This isn't DePIN; it's a glorified database with an expensive transaction log. We are building the future of infrastructure on the very 'Trust Me' models we set out to destroy."
AWS markets Nitro Enclaves as the ultimate isolation. Let's look at the engineering reality. It fails all four criteria of trustless compute:
Root of Trust: Controlled by AWS. The attestation is signed by Amazon's private key. If they want to fake it, they can.
Reproducible Builds: Zero. You cannot independently verify that the code running in the cloud matches your source.
Hardware Independence: None. You are at the mercy of AMD/Intel firmware backdoors and AWS hypervisors.
Author’s Insight: "Nitro Enclaves are like a safe where the manufacturer (Amazon) keeps a master key and refuses to let you see the blueprints. It protects you from your 'neighbor' in the datacenter, but it provides zero protection against the landlord. In a truly sovereign machine economy, there is no place for a landlord."
Beyond the security risks, there is the brutal reality of the AWS Tax. Centralized providers scale linearly with your success—meaning the more your DePIN grows, the more you owe Jeff Bezos.
AWS Costs (1M Sensors): ~$8,900/month (Invocations, storage, egress fees).
W3bstream Equivalent: ~$1,200/month (Self-hosted nodes, modular scaling).
The Result: An 86% cost reduction combined with cryptographic certainty.
Author’s Insight: "Centralized clouds are optimized for 'utilization-maximization' — they want you locked into their proprietary APIs and egress fees. W3bstream is optimized for 'verification-maximization.' We aren't just saving money; we are buying immunity from corporate and regulatory capture."
W3bstream does more than just process data; it creates a digital lineage for it. The architecture is divided into three echelons, where each layer cryptographically validates the integrity of the previous one:
Layer 1 (Origination): Data is born inside ioID and hardware TEEs (Trusted Execution Environments). This is the hardware root of trust.
Layer 2 (Compute): The WebAssembly (Wasm) runtime environment. Here, raw metrics are transformed into outcomes (e.g., calculating an insurance risk score), and a ZK-proof is generated simultaneously.
Layer 3 (Settlement): A smart contract on the IoTeX blockchain that verifies the proof in milliseconds and finalizes the result.
Author’s Insight: "In traditional IoT, data is a 'promise.' In W3bstream, data is a 'proof.' We utilize ATECC608-grade chips to lock private keys directly into the silicon. You cannot extract them; you cannot forge them. This is the bedrock upon which the entire DePIN skyscraper is built."
The fatal flaw of traditional cloud computing is non-determinism. The same code running on different servers can yield different results due to system calls, memory states, or clock drift. W3bstream utilizes a Wasm Runtime that is completely isolated:
No System Calls: Zero access to the network or local file systems.
Metered Execution: Every instruction costs "gas," eliminating the risk of infinite loops.
Canonical Serialization: Data is always packed identically across all nodes.
Author’s Insight: "Determinism is the Holy Grail of ZK-computing. Without it, generating a proof that confirms the correctness of code execution is impossible. We transform chaotic telemetry streams into an ordered mathematical sequence that any node in the network can verify."
W3bstream is not a rigid cage; it is a Swiss Army knife. Developers can select their specific proof system (Prover) based on their unique requirements:
Halo2 (PLONK): Fast and compact (proofs are only 3-5 KB). Ideal for simple logic, but vulnerable to future quantum attacks.
Risc0 (STARK): The heavyweight champion. While the proofs are larger, they are quantum-resistant (hash-based). This is exactly what Dr. Xinxin Fan advocates for: infrastructure protection for decades to come.
Author’s Insight: "Choosing a prover is always a trade-off between gas costs and security. Integrating Risc0 into the W3bstream pipeline is a direct insurance policy against the 'quantum apocalypse.' When Google Willow becomes a daily reality, projects built on Halo2 will face forced migrations and downtime, while IoTeX-based STARK projects will continue to operate as if nothing happened."
On December 9, 2024, the world changed. Google unveiled Willow—a 105-qubit quantum processor capable of solving problems in 5 minutes that would take a classical supercomputer 10 septillion years.
For DePIN, this is a death sentence. Modern blockchains (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana) rely on the secp256k1 curve. A cryptographically relevant quantum computer will shatter these keys in hours.
Author’s Insight: "If you are building a DePIN network for autonomous mobility or smart grids using standard ECDSA signatures, you are building a house of cards. The 'Store Now, Decrypt Later' attack is already active: state actors are harvesting your data today to decrypt it tomorrow. IoTeX is the only project deploying a bunker right now."
IoTeX Chief Cryptographer, Dr. Xinxin Fan (recipient of the IEEE ICBC 2024 Best Paper Award), has engineered the transition framework for the post-quantum era. His solution: the Hybrid Signature Scheme.
This acts as a "double lock": data is signed simultaneously by a classical ECDSA and a post-quantum lattice-based algorithm (like Dilithium).
Today: Both layers operate for backward compatibility.
Tomorrow: When quantum computing breaks ECDSA, the network simply discards the legacy layer and shifts entirely to Dilithium.
Dr. Fan’s research proves that ZK-proof systems like Halo2 or Groth16 are useless against quantum threats because they are built on elliptic curve pairings.
W3bstream bets on ZK-STARKs. These are founded on collision-resistant hash functions (Poseidon, Rescue). Hashing is inherently resistant to Shor’s algorithm.
Halo2 Quantum Security: 0 bits (Fully broken).
W3bstream STARK Security: 128-256 bits (Total protection).
Author’s Insight: "Using Halo2 in 2025 for critical infrastructure is professional negligence. W3bstream utilizes STARKs not just for speed, but for data sovereignty in the age of quantum supremacy. We aren't just processing data; we are making it immutable for eternity."
How do you verify 2.4 billion proofs from 100 million vehicles daily? On a standard blockchain, the gas costs would exceed $300 billion per day.
Dr. Fan’s breakthrough is Recursive STARK Composition:
1,000 proofs are compressed into a single "Meta-Proof."
1,000 "Meta-Proofs" are aggregated into a "Grand-Proof."
A single final proof is settled on-chain, verifying a billion transactions for $0.50 instead of billions of dollars.
The current DePIN landscape is a "fragmented mess." Projects like Helium, Hivemapper, and DIMO are forced to build redundant infrastructure—their own L1s, oracle networks, and security stacks. This burns millions in capital and creates data silos. A vehicle on DIMO cannot natively talk to a Helium MOBILE node.
IoTeX 2.0 solves this through Modularity.
IoTeX introduces Modular Security Pools (MSP). Instead of bootstrapping 100 validators from scratch, new DePIN projects "rent" security from the IoTeX L1.
Layer 1 (Settlement): IOTX stakers provide a $500M+ security umbrella.
MSP Layer: Projects join specific vertical pools (Mobility, Energy, Mapping).
W3bstream (Compute): A unified, off-chain compute hub serving all pools simultaneously.
Author’s Insight: "This is the 'Uber model' for blockchain. You don't need to own the fleet (the L1) to run a taxi service. You plug into the IoTeX infrastructure and pay only for what you use. This slashes Time-to-Market from 2 years to 2 months."
Through the ioID standard, a device becomes a universal citizen. Your electric vehicle can simultaneously:
Earn in the Mobility MSP for mileage.
Earn in the Energy MSP for vehicle-to-grid (V2G) power balancing.
Earn in the Mapping MSP for providing dashcam telemetry.
While standalone projects spend millions on maintenance, an MSP-based project shares costs. W3bstream amortizes the cost of ZK-proof generation across the entire ecosystem.
Author’s Insight: "Launching on IoTeX MSP shifts DePIN from CapEx to OpEx. Instead of raising millions for software development, you spend cents on ZK-proofs. It’s the economics of common sense."
The Decentralized Physical Infrastructure (DePIN) movement has reached a critical inflection point. The first wave proved market demand (Helium); the second wave proved device scalability (Hivemapper). However, the third wave—globally composable and quantum-resistant DePIN—cannot be built on legacy foundations:
AWS/Google Cloud: These are cryptographically bankrupt. Trusting "Confidential Computing" is merely trusting a corporation's promise, not mathematical certainty.
Legacy DePIN L1s: Custom blockchains where every project "reinvents the wheel" lead to fragmented liquidity and bloated security audit budgets.
W3bstream + IoTeX MSP is the only stack providing ZK-STARK verification, Dr. Fan’s post-quantum security framework, and modular economics that are 10x more cost-effective than custom-built solutions.
Google’s Willow processor has accelerated the timeline toward the "cryptographic singularity." The "Store now, decrypt later" attack is no longer a theory—it is a present reality. Data harvested today will be compromised by 2030. Only hash-based cryptography, the foundation of W3bstream’s STARK implementation, ensures long-term data integrity.
Author’s Insight: "Ignoring the quantum threat in 2025 is equivalent to building critical infrastructure with a pre-installed time bomb. IoTeX provides the only viable 'bunker' for the machine economy."
The future of DePIN is not a thousand isolated L1 blockchains, but Modular Security Pools (MSP) anchored to a battle-tested settlement layer.
Hivemapper should focus on mapping, not maintaining a blockchain.
DIMO should focus on data marketplaces, not building proof systems.
By inheriting security and identity from IoTeX, projects can launch in 6 weeks instead of 2 years. This is the economics of common sense: transitioning from CapEx-heavy infrastructure to OpEx-efficient modularity.
For DePIN Founders: Evaluate the true cost of your custom L1 against an MSP deployment. If you don't embrace modularity, you will be outcompeted on costs and security.
For Hardware Manufacturers: Integrate ioID (Secure Element) now. Without a hardware-rooted identity, your devices will become obsolete the moment quantum computers break software authentication.
For Blockchain Developers: Study Dr. Fan’s ICBC 2024 award-winning research. Transition to STARKs and hash-based signatures (Dilithium) before the threat forces an emergency migration under adversarial conditions.
The infrastructure standard is not AWS. The infrastructure standard is not Ethereum. The infrastructure standard is W3bstream.
Document Classification: Strategic Infrastructure Research Technical References:
Dr. Xinxin Fan, "Post-Quantum Cryptographic Transitions for Smart Contract Platforms," IEEE ICBC 2024.
NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (ML-KEM, ML-DSA).
Google Quantum AI, "Willow: Quantum Error Correction Below Threshold," Dec 2024.
About the Author
Artem Teplov is a Technical Protocol Architect and Infrastructure Analyst based in Los Angeles, CA. He specializes in high-fidelity Whitepaper development, Protocol Gap Analysis, and the architectural auditing of complex DeFi and DePIN ecosystems. Artem’s work focuses on the intersection of computational physics, tokenomic sustainability, and risk mitigation for next-generation decentralized networks.
Strategic Inquiries & Protocol Audits: If your project requires a rigorous technical deep-dive or a standard-setting Whitepaper, let’s connect.
Farcaster: @artemteplov
X (Twitter): @Teplov_AG
Author’s Note: If you find this technical analysis valuable, please consider supporting my work. Your engagement is the fuel that drives these deep-dives into the future of the machine economy. Thank you!
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Artem Teplov | Technical Content Architect
Artem Teplov | Technical Content Architect
No comments yet