Subscribe to BECOMING
BECOMINGMusic is Fine Art?
10 music collectors of 2024 were interviewed to better understand the incentives and problems within the music nft space Play the WHAT TYPE OF COLLECTOR ARE YOU game. This game was specifically made based on the interviews and collectors that contributed to this research!Collaborators: Chatgpt, Karma GAP, Frankie, Martin, Steph Guerrero, Max Pretends, Ben, Carlos, Eric, Anon1, Bricks, hamburglar Pick your player….The Emotional Connector: Collects based on emotional connection and personal rel...
BECOMINGAre NFTs Worth It: We Found The Definitive Answer
Author: Vince Martellacci with Forge Collective “Remember Beanie Babies? Yeah, there are still people who will cry if you take the tag off in front of them. Those tags cost less than a penny to make, yet the world got together and agreed that those tags conferred value. NFTs act in exactly the same way. It’s a value we collectively ascribe. So to decide whether NFTs are a scam, ask yourself if Beanie Babies were a scam. I promise we’d all come up with different answers. Are NFTS a good invest...
BECOMINGRestoring our Earth with Mushroom Magic
This is an article I wrote in collaboration with Valley DAO, you can find the official publication here Mycoremediation, a largely unexplored realm within the broader field of bioremediation, presents an intriguing solution for reversing the impacts of pollution. However, it raises the question – if this solution truly is a viable one, why hasn’t it achieved commercial success and mainstream uptake? As we’re on a mission to solve climate challenges using biology, we’ve written this article to...
<100 subscribers
Support BECOMING
BECOMINGDigital vs. Physical : Collector Conversations
Subscribe to BECOMING
<100 subscribers
Support BECOMING
BECOMINGDigital vs. Physical : Collector Conversations
BECOMINGMusic is Fine Art?
10 music collectors of 2024 were interviewed to better understand the incentives and problems within the music nft space Play the WHAT TYPE OF COLLECTOR ARE YOU game. This game was specifically made based on the interviews and collectors that contributed to this research!Collaborators: Chatgpt, Karma GAP, Frankie, Martin, Steph Guerrero, Max Pretends, Ben, Carlos, Eric, Anon1, Bricks, hamburglar Pick your player….The Emotional Connector: Collects based on emotional connection and personal rel...
BECOMINGAre NFTs Worth It: We Found The Definitive Answer
Author: Vince Martellacci with Forge Collective “Remember Beanie Babies? Yeah, there are still people who will cry if you take the tag off in front of them. Those tags cost less than a penny to make, yet the world got together and agreed that those tags conferred value. NFTs act in exactly the same way. It’s a value we collectively ascribe. So to decide whether NFTs are a scam, ask yourself if Beanie Babies were a scam. I promise we’d all come up with different answers. Are NFTS a good invest...
BECOMINGRestoring our Earth with Mushroom Magic
This is an article I wrote in collaboration with Valley DAO, you can find the official publication here Mycoremediation, a largely unexplored realm within the broader field of bioremediation, presents an intriguing solution for reversing the impacts of pollution. However, it raises the question – if this solution truly is a viable one, why hasn’t it achieved commercial success and mainstream uptake? As we’re on a mission to solve climate challenges using biology, we’ve written this article to...
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
This article was written in collaboration with Chatgpt. I love you AI, please don't destroy us <3
This is an introduction article to an article I am writing about collector incentives in the music NFT space, please subscribe to stay updated!
Non-Data perspective:
It seems like most of the collector’s ideals and beliefs are aligned, which is interesting! I think this may point to how well we’ve created the “Web3 vibe” so to speak. There are definitely a lot of common threads throughout the collector and artist experience as a whole, as you’ll see in my next write-up. Still, I enjoy analyzing the differences because I think this is where the real gold is.
Feel free to add any additional thoughts below. I would love to hear if anyone is surprised by the information or if there was anything in particular you found interesting about the analyzation!
The Purist: Wants clear distinctions between physical and digital art, prioritizing the uniqueness of each.
https://opensea.io/assets/ethereum/0x0AD1cA530C2440808982E7085D19F503D03eD240/0
The Transformer: Sees digitization as an opportunity for expanding and transforming physical art into new forms.
https://opensea.io/assets/ethereum/0x0AD1cA530C2440808982E7085D19F503D03eD240/1
The Blended-Value Supporter: Values both physical and digital art equally and appreciates variety across mediums.
https://opensea.io/assets/ethereum/0x0AD1cA530C2440808982E7085D19F503D03eD240/2
The Innovator: Embraces new technologies and is focused on blending digital tools with traditional art forms to create new experiences.
https://opensea.io/assets/ethereum/0x0AD1cA530C2440808982E7085D19F503D03eD240/3
The Collector-First Thinker: Prioritizes transparency and trust between artists and collectors, focusing on maintaining the integrity of the market.
https://opensea.io/assets/ethereum/0x0AD1cA530C2440808982E7085D19F503D03eD240/4
The Pragmatist: Sees NFTs as a practical evolution of traditional art markets and is comfortable with physical and digital coexisting in similar ways to traditional prints.
https://opensea.io/assets/ethereum/0x0AD1cA530C2440808982E7085D19F503D03eD240/5
detailed description of each character type found here
Intentionality and Transparency:
Most contributors emphasize the importance of intentionality behind blending physical and digital works. If an artist sells both versions (physical and digital), the intent should be clear. Transparency in the process was repeatedly highlighted as crucial to maintaining trust between artists and collectors. Collectors like @Bastienjpg and @realjasonmatias noted that selling the same “unique” story in both formats can be questionable if not disclosed properly. This transparency impacts collector confidence in the uniqueness and value of both forms.
Unique Value of Physical vs. Digital:
There is a divide among collectors and artists regarding the value of physical art versus digital-native works. Some, like @ProfKeeting, prefer a clear distinction between the two, valuing them for their own unique merits. Others, like @Joffnft and @shashxg, find value in owning both the physical and digital versions of the same piece.
Purist vs. Hybrid Views:
Contributors like @ProfKeeting lean toward a more purist view, preferring clear separations between physical and digital art for the sake of uniqueness. Others, like @trevorjonesart and @shillypreston, see no issue with blending physical and digital mediums, likening it to traditional practices like producing prints or lithographs. For these contributors, variety in medium enriches the artistic experience.
Concerns About Redundancy and Duplicity:
There is some skepticism about artists selling both digital and physical versions of the same artwork without proper explanation. @vandaloruins and @Bastienjpg expressed concerns that simply scanning a physical work and minting it as an NFT could feel redundant or like a cash grab, unless there is a deeper connection or utility offered. They prefer when both mediums complement each other, rather than replicating the same artwork in two different forms.
New Data-Driven Art Forms:
Contributors like @vandaloruins are excited by the possibility of using data from physical art (e.g., brush strokes, pigmentation) to create entirely new digital works that go beyond simple replication. This concept opens the door for artists to create "data sculptures" or other new forms that incorporate elements of the physical while offering something distinct in the digital space.
Dynamic Elements in Digital-Physical Blends:
Several contributors, like @Iknowthisquestion and @CaptainMorie, suggested incorporating dynamic elements in the digital versions of physical art. Adding animations or other elements unique to the digital form would allow for a more interactive, engaging experience, making the digital version more than just a reproduction of the physical.
The conversation highlights the diversity of opinions surrounding physical and digital art in the NFT space. While transparency and intentionality remain crucial for blending physical and digital mediums, collectors appreciate when both forms retain their own unique value. The potential for digital transformation and dynamic additions presents exciting opportunities for artists to innovate, while the role of NFTs as certificates of ownership enhances the utility of physical-digital hybrids. Going forward, a balanced approach that respects both mediums while offering transparency will likely resonate most with collectors and artists alike.
Remember, I have another article coming out about collector incentives in the music web3 space, subscribed if you enjoyed this experience :)))) thank you for reading. And if you collected, know that it is an encouragement for me to continue write-ups like these<3
This article was written in collaboration with Chatgpt. I love you AI, please don't destroy us <3
This is an introduction article to an article I am writing about collector incentives in the music NFT space, please subscribe to stay updated!
Non-Data perspective:
It seems like most of the collector’s ideals and beliefs are aligned, which is interesting! I think this may point to how well we’ve created the “Web3 vibe” so to speak. There are definitely a lot of common threads throughout the collector and artist experience as a whole, as you’ll see in my next write-up. Still, I enjoy analyzing the differences because I think this is where the real gold is.
Feel free to add any additional thoughts below. I would love to hear if anyone is surprised by the information or if there was anything in particular you found interesting about the analyzation!
The Purist: Wants clear distinctions between physical and digital art, prioritizing the uniqueness of each.
https://opensea.io/assets/ethereum/0x0AD1cA530C2440808982E7085D19F503D03eD240/0
The Transformer: Sees digitization as an opportunity for expanding and transforming physical art into new forms.
https://opensea.io/assets/ethereum/0x0AD1cA530C2440808982E7085D19F503D03eD240/1
The Blended-Value Supporter: Values both physical and digital art equally and appreciates variety across mediums.
https://opensea.io/assets/ethereum/0x0AD1cA530C2440808982E7085D19F503D03eD240/2
The Innovator: Embraces new technologies and is focused on blending digital tools with traditional art forms to create new experiences.
https://opensea.io/assets/ethereum/0x0AD1cA530C2440808982E7085D19F503D03eD240/3
The Collector-First Thinker: Prioritizes transparency and trust between artists and collectors, focusing on maintaining the integrity of the market.
https://opensea.io/assets/ethereum/0x0AD1cA530C2440808982E7085D19F503D03eD240/4
The Pragmatist: Sees NFTs as a practical evolution of traditional art markets and is comfortable with physical and digital coexisting in similar ways to traditional prints.
https://opensea.io/assets/ethereum/0x0AD1cA530C2440808982E7085D19F503D03eD240/5
detailed description of each character type found here
Intentionality and Transparency:
Most contributors emphasize the importance of intentionality behind blending physical and digital works. If an artist sells both versions (physical and digital), the intent should be clear. Transparency in the process was repeatedly highlighted as crucial to maintaining trust between artists and collectors. Collectors like @Bastienjpg and @realjasonmatias noted that selling the same “unique” story in both formats can be questionable if not disclosed properly. This transparency impacts collector confidence in the uniqueness and value of both forms.
Unique Value of Physical vs. Digital:
There is a divide among collectors and artists regarding the value of physical art versus digital-native works. Some, like @ProfKeeting, prefer a clear distinction between the two, valuing them for their own unique merits. Others, like @Joffnft and @shashxg, find value in owning both the physical and digital versions of the same piece.
Purist vs. Hybrid Views:
Contributors like @ProfKeeting lean toward a more purist view, preferring clear separations between physical and digital art for the sake of uniqueness. Others, like @trevorjonesart and @shillypreston, see no issue with blending physical and digital mediums, likening it to traditional practices like producing prints or lithographs. For these contributors, variety in medium enriches the artistic experience.
Concerns About Redundancy and Duplicity:
There is some skepticism about artists selling both digital and physical versions of the same artwork without proper explanation. @vandaloruins and @Bastienjpg expressed concerns that simply scanning a physical work and minting it as an NFT could feel redundant or like a cash grab, unless there is a deeper connection or utility offered. They prefer when both mediums complement each other, rather than replicating the same artwork in two different forms.
New Data-Driven Art Forms:
Contributors like @vandaloruins are excited by the possibility of using data from physical art (e.g., brush strokes, pigmentation) to create entirely new digital works that go beyond simple replication. This concept opens the door for artists to create "data sculptures" or other new forms that incorporate elements of the physical while offering something distinct in the digital space.
Dynamic Elements in Digital-Physical Blends:
Several contributors, like @Iknowthisquestion and @CaptainMorie, suggested incorporating dynamic elements in the digital versions of physical art. Adding animations or other elements unique to the digital form would allow for a more interactive, engaging experience, making the digital version more than just a reproduction of the physical.
The conversation highlights the diversity of opinions surrounding physical and digital art in the NFT space. While transparency and intentionality remain crucial for blending physical and digital mediums, collectors appreciate when both forms retain their own unique value. The potential for digital transformation and dynamic additions presents exciting opportunities for artists to innovate, while the role of NFTs as certificates of ownership enhances the utility of physical-digital hybrids. Going forward, a balanced approach that respects both mediums while offering transparency will likely resonate most with collectors and artists alike.
Remember, I have another article coming out about collector incentives in the music web3 space, subscribed if you enjoyed this experience :)))) thank you for reading. And if you collected, know that it is an encouragement for me to continue write-ups like these<3
Transformation and New Possibilities:
There is a sense of excitement around the potential for transformation when physical artworks are digitized. @CaptainMorie highlighted how bringing a physical piece into the digital world can reveal "missing elements," offering new possibilities that the physical piece alone cannot. This view sees digitization as an opportunity to expand the artwork's reach, rather than merely replicating the physical piece.
Blending and New Creative Practices:
Several comments touched on the concept of blending physical and digital art as part of evolving artistic practice. Artists like @Fractal_Visions and @trevorjonesart have worked in both mediums, embracing variety. @robevans_art noted how this shift allows artists to explore new forms, blending traditional techniques with digital processes. Artists also discussed how the Web3 space provides an opportunity for traditional artists to expand into digital work, helping to bring new audiences into digital art.
Digital as Certification and Utility:
Some collectors, like @shashxg, viewed NFTs tied to physical art as a digital certificate of ownership that enhances the collector's experience. @mich_viljoen described the pairing of physical art with NFTs as a way to extend the artwork’s utility and ensure its ownership is verifiable and accessible across different platforms. This view strengthens the relationship between physical artworks and their NFT counterparts.
Transformation and New Possibilities:
There is a sense of excitement around the potential for transformation when physical artworks are digitized. @CaptainMorie highlighted how bringing a physical piece into the digital world can reveal "missing elements," offering new possibilities that the physical piece alone cannot. This view sees digitization as an opportunity to expand the artwork's reach, rather than merely replicating the physical piece.
Blending and New Creative Practices:
Several comments touched on the concept of blending physical and digital art as part of evolving artistic practice. Artists like @Fractal_Visions and @trevorjonesart have worked in both mediums, embracing variety. @robevans_art noted how this shift allows artists to explore new forms, blending traditional techniques with digital processes. Artists also discussed how the Web3 space provides an opportunity for traditional artists to expand into digital work, helping to bring new audiences into digital art.
Digital as Certification and Utility:
Some collectors, like @shashxg, viewed NFTs tied to physical art as a digital certificate of ownership that enhances the collector's experience. @mich_viljoen described the pairing of physical art with NFTs as a way to extend the artwork’s utility and ensure its ownership is verifiable and accessible across different platforms. This view strengthens the relationship between physical artworks and their NFT counterparts.
No comments yet