<100 subscribers

Rethinking Money: A Balanced View on Fiat and Financial Systems
"Beyond the myths: a balanced look at fiat, central banks, and your financial future."

The Great Divide: A Remix of Empiricism vs. Idealism
For Locke, the human mind at birth is a tabula rasa—a blank slate. All knowledge and all understanding of the world are derived solely from our sensory experiences.

“The Hidden Goldmine of Web3 Writing: Why Paragraph Could Change Everything”
That means each article you publish isn’t just a piece of content floating around—it generates coins tied to that specific post.



Rethinking Money: A Balanced View on Fiat and Financial Systems
"Beyond the myths: a balanced look at fiat, central banks, and your financial future."

The Great Divide: A Remix of Empiricism vs. Idealism
For Locke, the human mind at birth is a tabula rasa—a blank slate. All knowledge and all understanding of the world are derived solely from our sensory experiences.

“The Hidden Goldmine of Web3 Writing: Why Paragraph Could Change Everything”
That means each article you publish isn’t just a piece of content floating around—it generates coins tied to that specific post.
President Donald Trump, never one to shy from a provocative statement, has once again stirred the pot, this time with a bold accusation of a "conspiracy against the United States." The target of his ire? A seemingly innocuous military parade in Beijing that brought together three of America's most prominent geopolitical rivals: Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.
On his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump's message was a masterclass in passive-aggression. He began with a seemingly warm congratulations to China for their 80th-anniversary celebration of victory over Japan in World War II. Yet, the niceties abruptly vanished as he pivoted to a searing indictment. "Please extend my warmest regards to Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un, as you conspire against the United States," he wrote, framing the presence of the three leaders as a deliberate, hostile act.
The spectacle itself was one of grand symbolism. In China's largest-ever military display, Xi stood flanked by Putin and Kim, a visual representation of a burgeoning alliance. They watched a parade of thousands of troops, advanced weaponry, and a display of aerial might. This public display of unity was a clear message to the world—and to Washington—that this trio of nations is strengthening its bonds.
Trump's frustration wasn't limited to the present. He also challenged Xi to acknowledge the pivotal role the U.S. played in China's victory during WWII, a point often downplayed in Chinese state history. "The big question that must be answered is whether President Xi will mention the massive support and 'blood' that the United States gave to China," he wrote, reminding his audience of American sacrifices often forgotten in the modern era of geopolitical rivalry.
This verbal volley arrives at a particularly sensitive moment. The U.S. and China are locked in a tense trade negotiation, a high-stakes game of economic brinkmanship. Meanwhile, the war in Ukraine rages on, with Putin defiant despite international pressure. Trump's words reveal a deep-seated anxiety about a shifting global order, one where a powerful, unified front could challenge America's long-held dominance.
Whether this Beijing gathering was a true conspiracy or simply a diplomatic photo op is a matter of perspective. But for Donald Trump, the image of Xi, Putin, and Kim standing shoulder to shoulder was a clear and present danger—one he felt compelled to call out, in no uncertain terms.
Best Siallagan
President Donald Trump, never one to shy from a provocative statement, has once again stirred the pot, this time with a bold accusation of a "conspiracy against the United States." The target of his ire? A seemingly innocuous military parade in Beijing that brought together three of America's most prominent geopolitical rivals: Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.
On his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump's message was a masterclass in passive-aggression. He began with a seemingly warm congratulations to China for their 80th-anniversary celebration of victory over Japan in World War II. Yet, the niceties abruptly vanished as he pivoted to a searing indictment. "Please extend my warmest regards to Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un, as you conspire against the United States," he wrote, framing the presence of the three leaders as a deliberate, hostile act.
The spectacle itself was one of grand symbolism. In China's largest-ever military display, Xi stood flanked by Putin and Kim, a visual representation of a burgeoning alliance. They watched a parade of thousands of troops, advanced weaponry, and a display of aerial might. This public display of unity was a clear message to the world—and to Washington—that this trio of nations is strengthening its bonds.
Trump's frustration wasn't limited to the present. He also challenged Xi to acknowledge the pivotal role the U.S. played in China's victory during WWII, a point often downplayed in Chinese state history. "The big question that must be answered is whether President Xi will mention the massive support and 'blood' that the United States gave to China," he wrote, reminding his audience of American sacrifices often forgotten in the modern era of geopolitical rivalry.
This verbal volley arrives at a particularly sensitive moment. The U.S. and China are locked in a tense trade negotiation, a high-stakes game of economic brinkmanship. Meanwhile, the war in Ukraine rages on, with Putin defiant despite international pressure. Trump's words reveal a deep-seated anxiety about a shifting global order, one where a powerful, unified front could challenge America's long-held dominance.
Whether this Beijing gathering was a true conspiracy or simply a diplomatic photo op is a matter of perspective. But for Donald Trump, the image of Xi, Putin, and Kim standing shoulder to shoulder was a clear and present danger—one he felt compelled to call out, in no uncertain terms.
Best Siallagan
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
No comments yet