BLACK FIELD PUBLISHING is not a brand seeking attention. It is a point of gravity. In a landscape driven by noise, we build structures that attract through weight, not volume.
BLACK FIELD PUBLISHING is not a brand seeking attention. It is a point of gravity. In a landscape driven by noise, we build structures that attract through weight, not volume.
Subscribe to BLACK FIELD PUBLISHING
Subscribe to BLACK FIELD PUBLISHING
<100 subscribers
<100 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Structures rarely change. What changes are the positions from which they are observed.
— Lexx Che
Over the years people from different countries and professional environments have written recommendations about my work. What interests me most is not the praise itself, but the diversity of perspectives behind it.
Former colleagues, founders, designers, developers, clients, and operators from adjacent industries often describe completely different aspects of the same trajectory of work.
Some remember the early years of design and art direction, when visual language and precision defined the foundation. Others speak about systems thinking, strategic architecture, and the construction of complex projects built under pressure.
Some refer to collaborations that took place many years ago in creative industries. Others mention more recent initiatives such as ТАКТИКА — a project that emerged during the war in Ukraine and turned design into a civic and cultural response.
Each of these voices captures only one angle. But together they begin to outline something larger — a structure that has been developing across different industries, disciplines, and environments for many years.
When work evolves over a long period of time, it gradually stops belonging to a single profession. It begins to exist somewhere between art direction, systems thinking, strategy, cultural response, and the quiet discipline of building things that continue to function when stability disappears.
This is the territory where my current work through BLACK FIELD PUBLISHING is located.
The books I am publishing now are not traditional business literature and not motivational frameworks. They examine the mechanics of responsibility, decision-making, discipline, and strategic thinking in environments where clarity is rare and action must continue without the comfort of certainty.
What interests me most today is how people from different fields approach these ideas.
Designers, founders, strategists, engineers, operators, investors, and thinkers from adjacent disciplines often read the same text from completely different angles.
And that is precisely the signal that the work has moved beyond a single professional niche and entered a wider conversation about how people think, decide, and act inside complex systems.
Perhaps the most honest form of recognition is not agreement.
It is the moment when people from different disciplines recognize something of their own thinking inside the same work.
Structures rarely change. What changes are the positions from which they are observed.
— Lexx Che
Over the years people from different countries and professional environments have written recommendations about my work. What interests me most is not the praise itself, but the diversity of perspectives behind it.
Former colleagues, founders, designers, developers, clients, and operators from adjacent industries often describe completely different aspects of the same trajectory of work.
Some remember the early years of design and art direction, when visual language and precision defined the foundation. Others speak about systems thinking, strategic architecture, and the construction of complex projects built under pressure.
Some refer to collaborations that took place many years ago in creative industries. Others mention more recent initiatives such as ТАКТИКА — a project that emerged during the war in Ukraine and turned design into a civic and cultural response.
Each of these voices captures only one angle. But together they begin to outline something larger — a structure that has been developing across different industries, disciplines, and environments for many years.
When work evolves over a long period of time, it gradually stops belonging to a single profession. It begins to exist somewhere between art direction, systems thinking, strategy, cultural response, and the quiet discipline of building things that continue to function when stability disappears.
This is the territory where my current work through BLACK FIELD PUBLISHING is located.
The books I am publishing now are not traditional business literature and not motivational frameworks. They examine the mechanics of responsibility, decision-making, discipline, and strategic thinking in environments where clarity is rare and action must continue without the comfort of certainty.
What interests me most today is how people from different fields approach these ideas.
Designers, founders, strategists, engineers, operators, investors, and thinkers from adjacent disciplines often read the same text from completely different angles.
And that is precisely the signal that the work has moved beyond a single professional niche and entered a wider conversation about how people think, decide, and act inside complex systems.
Perhaps the most honest form of recognition is not agreement.
It is the moment when people from different disciplines recognize something of their own thinking inside the same work.
No activity yet