<100 subscribers

Humanity’s deepest wound is not a lack of love, but a refusal to recognize how we’ve exiled the very parts of ourselves capable of giving and receiving it. A rupture of a cultural divorce from the sacred—a severing of the “golden rope” that once bound the human soul to the divine. Jungian psychology echoes this, diagnosing modernity’s malaise as a crisis of *archetypal dissociation*.
The Unsung Renegade | C.F. Su is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
We’ve fragmented the masculine and feminine into caricatures: the masculine reduced to a hollow engine of productivity, the feminine diminished to an ornament or a problem to be managed. This split isn’t merely personal; it’s the bedrock of a society that worships transaction over connection, power over presence.
The masculine archetype, in its health, is not a tyrant but a steward—grounded in responsibility that nurtures rather than exploits. Yet centuries of materialism have warped this role. Jung’s *King, Warrior, Magician, Lover* archetypes have been co-opted by capitalism, their nobility flattened into a compulsion to accumulate. The modern man is told his worth lies in what he *provides*, not who he *is*.
He becomes a ghost in a suit, chasing validation through titles and trophies, unaware that his exhaustion stems not from effort but from the absence of meaning. His “responsibility” is a cage, not because duty is inherently oppressive, but because it’s been stripped of its sacred thread: the call to protect, create, and *love*.
The feminine archetype, meanwhile, is suffocated by paradox. She’s idealized as a muse, mother, or maiden—yet punished for embodying the raw, untamed force of life. The feminine is the “eternal invitation” to ecstasy, but modernity has muted her voice. She’s pressured to shrink into roles that demand her luminosity serve others’ narratives: the supportive wife, the effortless caregiver, the object of desire. Yet her true power lies in what she *demands*: presence. Not the performative attention of gifts or grand gestures, but the courage to meet her in the uncharted terrain of vulnerability. She doesn’t want to be placed on a pedestal; she wants the pedestal shattered so both can stand in the rubble, equal and alive.
Thanks for reading The Unsung Renegade | C.F. Su! This post is public so feel free to share it.
Society, in Jung’s terms, is a hall of mirrors reflecting our collective shadow. We’ve replaced genuine connection with curated personas, mistaking “likes” for belonging and busyness for purpose. Our institutions—education, politics, even spirituality—often reinforce this fragmentation. Schools train workers, not whole beings; governments prioritize GDP over communal well-being; religions preach dogma while sidelining mysticism. The result is a world where loneliness thrives amid hyper-connectivity, and the hunger to be loved metastasizes into consumerism, addiction, and existential fatigue.
Divine union, then, is not a romantic ideal but an act of rebellion. It requires dismantling the false binaries of masculine/feminine, sacred/profane, and even self/other. Johnson insists ecstasy is found not in escape but in *return*—to the body, to the present, to the messy truth of our shared humanity. For the masculine, this means reclaiming responsibility as an act of love, not control. For the feminine, it’s the audacity to occupy space without apology. Together, they converge not in perfection, but in the fertile dark where masks dissolve. Here, Jung’s *coniunctio*—the alchemical marriage—unfolds: two halves recognizing they were never truly separate, just estranged by a world that profits from their division.
Healing begins when we stop seeking love as a commodity and start embodying it as a practice. To be loved, we must first cease abandoning ourselves.
Subscribe for more
blockmage.io
The Unsung Renegade | C.F. Su is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Humanity’s deepest wound is not a lack of love, but a refusal to recognize how we’ve exiled the very parts of ourselves capable of giving and receiving it. A rupture of a cultural divorce from the sacred—a severing of the “golden rope” that once bound the human soul to the divine. Jungian psychology echoes this, diagnosing modernity’s malaise as a crisis of *archetypal dissociation*.
The Unsung Renegade | C.F. Su is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
We’ve fragmented the masculine and feminine into caricatures: the masculine reduced to a hollow engine of productivity, the feminine diminished to an ornament or a problem to be managed. This split isn’t merely personal; it’s the bedrock of a society that worships transaction over connection, power over presence.
The masculine archetype, in its health, is not a tyrant but a steward—grounded in responsibility that nurtures rather than exploits. Yet centuries of materialism have warped this role. Jung’s *King, Warrior, Magician, Lover* archetypes have been co-opted by capitalism, their nobility flattened into a compulsion to accumulate. The modern man is told his worth lies in what he *provides*, not who he *is*.
He becomes a ghost in a suit, chasing validation through titles and trophies, unaware that his exhaustion stems not from effort but from the absence of meaning. His “responsibility” is a cage, not because duty is inherently oppressive, but because it’s been stripped of its sacred thread: the call to protect, create, and *love*.
The feminine archetype, meanwhile, is suffocated by paradox. She’s idealized as a muse, mother, or maiden—yet punished for embodying the raw, untamed force of life. The feminine is the “eternal invitation” to ecstasy, but modernity has muted her voice. She’s pressured to shrink into roles that demand her luminosity serve others’ narratives: the supportive wife, the effortless caregiver, the object of desire. Yet her true power lies in what she *demands*: presence. Not the performative attention of gifts or grand gestures, but the courage to meet her in the uncharted terrain of vulnerability. She doesn’t want to be placed on a pedestal; she wants the pedestal shattered so both can stand in the rubble, equal and alive.
Thanks for reading The Unsung Renegade | C.F. Su! This post is public so feel free to share it.
Society, in Jung’s terms, is a hall of mirrors reflecting our collective shadow. We’ve replaced genuine connection with curated personas, mistaking “likes” for belonging and busyness for purpose. Our institutions—education, politics, even spirituality—often reinforce this fragmentation. Schools train workers, not whole beings; governments prioritize GDP over communal well-being; religions preach dogma while sidelining mysticism. The result is a world where loneliness thrives amid hyper-connectivity, and the hunger to be loved metastasizes into consumerism, addiction, and existential fatigue.
Divine union, then, is not a romantic ideal but an act of rebellion. It requires dismantling the false binaries of masculine/feminine, sacred/profane, and even self/other. Johnson insists ecstasy is found not in escape but in *return*—to the body, to the present, to the messy truth of our shared humanity. For the masculine, this means reclaiming responsibility as an act of love, not control. For the feminine, it’s the audacity to occupy space without apology. Together, they converge not in perfection, but in the fertile dark where masks dissolve. Here, Jung’s *coniunctio*—the alchemical marriage—unfolds: two halves recognizing they were never truly separate, just estranged by a world that profits from their division.
Healing begins when we stop seeking love as a commodity and start embodying it as a practice. To be loved, we must first cease abandoning ourselves.
Subscribe for more
blockmage.io
The Unsung Renegade | C.F. Su is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
No comments yet