It is simple: 12 times after the CBA season, 8 a man’s basket, whose strength is clearly superior, deliberately vacated the second competition, with the aim of “washing the game” for the aid that was suspended, and on 14 April, when the men’s basket of older men won in the third competition, the long-term male basket and the Kanya male basket ran a cradle at the end of the competition: The Kenyan maquila basket, which has failed in the lead and whose main coach, Lee, was indifferent, culminated in the “p愿” of the Ketumia men’s basket for the long-term male basket.

Poor performances triggered a sharp spectacular wave, with the word “failed ball” appearing very quickly on the first of the hot search list, the fifth of the highest hot search list, and the other at least four related articles on the search.

Looking again at the response of China’s Basket: this evening (in fact, the morning of 15 days), the Chinese Basket agreed to conduct an investigation. At this time, the external pronouncements of the Basket Association remain unconscionable, considering that there is little possibility of regulation and punishment in the industry, but on 17 days the results of the sanctions were promptly published and two competitions were found to be negative.

This reflects the first feature of this penalty: timeliness. The results of the punishment were published less than three days after the evening of the statement survey. This timely approach first captures the recognition of balloons.

The second is a “severe” penalty: one is the cancellation of two teams of batch competitions, two of which have a net reduction of 5 million yuan renminbi, three times the long-term male basket owner, Lee Springang, for five years, the suspension of the trainee’s registration, and the three-year suspension of the train-the-trainer’s register by the male basket owner of Ketumya, and the three-year birth of the long-term male basket manager, the “restriction of basketball activities” and the five-year limit on the activities of the Tua male basket chief executive, Rinje.

Whether 5 million, 5 years or 3 years, penalties are undoubtedly severe.

In practice, however, this penalty is highly artistic and flexible: first, it protects the club well and has not been contested during the Kimia men’s basket, while the long-standing male basket is simply disqualified and the future of the two teams is not affected; secondly, two coaches are merely suspension of the trainee’s registration, i.e., they are not able to practise, but are theoretically able to perform other related work on basketball; and, in fact, they are less meaningful and not personalized.

For its part, this punishment is a loud, small, but less injurious.

But in any case, this has given the outside world a clear recipe, and the two coaches have banned the registration of the trainee, which is indeed a very heavy penalty, or even the possibility of interrupting the career, thus making the penalty somewhat screaming or larger and shattering some undesirable phenomena.

The decisive penalties of this Chinese basket association are, in fact, a “small mind” and merely a thumb of thought, which has a long mind.

FAC has long condoned all sorts of evil and bad behaviour: in the middle of the 2021 race, one of the lagging balloons is behind, and the naked negative competition can even be described as a balloon, with the result that it is not punishable. Even more madness is the fact that, after the improper statements of Lee and the exposure to bad behaviour, the General Directorate ordered the Chinese Federation to conduct itself in-house, so that it was not possible for the Association to take a place.

Eventually, a second challenge to the bottom line of the balloon, the bottom line of the challenging industry, the bottom line of the challenging regulatory layer, culminated in the removal of today’s two full-time officers and several middle-level officials responsible for country names, competitions and disciplinary sanctions.

In fact, China’s basketball has also suffered from many negative phenomena, the most obvious of which is that the basketball decision has always been a serious disaster for public opinion, and that it has been carried out in a blatant and unscrupulous manner. However, with the inauguration of a large number of FAC officials and the presence of mobile teams in the General Directorate, the Chinese basket association finally became aware of the right decision.

As a balloon, I hope that this basket association will have the courage of digging up and strengthening the management of adjudicators; as a soccer media, I would like more to see the Chinese Federation and China’s Basket Association (China) in the future in the face of ugly acts such as casinos, with real and constant courage and determination.

It is simple: 12 times after the CBA season, 8 a man’s basket, whose strength is clearly superior, deliberately vacated the second competition, with the aim of “washing the game” for the aid that was suspended, and on 14 April, when the men’s basket of older men won in the third competition, the long-term male basket and the Kanya male basket ran a cradle at the end of the competition: The Kenyan maquila basket, which has failed in the lead and whose main coach, Lee, was indifferent, culminated in the “p愿” of the Ketumia men’s basket for the long-term male basket.

Poor performances triggered a sharp spectacular wave, with the word “failed ball” appearing very quickly on the first of the hot search list, the fifth of the highest hot search list, and the other at least four related articles on the search.

Looking again at the response of China’s Basket: this evening (in fact, the morning of 15 days), the Chinese Basket agreed to conduct an investigation. At this time, the external pronouncements of the Basket Association remain unconscionable, considering that there is little possibility of regulation and punishment in the industry, but on 17 days the results of the sanctions were promptly published and two competitions were found to be negative.

This reflects the first feature of this penalty: timeliness. The results of the punishment were published less than three days after the evening of the statement survey. This timely approach first captures the recognition of balloons.

The second is a “severe” penalty: one is the cancellation of two teams of batch competitions, two of which have a net reduction of 5 million yuan renminbi, three times the long-term male basket owner, Lee Springang, for five years, the suspension of the trainee’s registration, and the three-year suspension of the train-the-trainer’s register by the male basket owner of Ketumya, and the three-year birth of the long-term male basket manager, the “restriction of basketball activities” and the five-year limit on the activities of the Tua male basket chief executive, Rinje.

Whether 5 million, 5 years or 3 years, penalties are undoubtedly severe.

In practice, however, this penalty is highly artistic and flexible: first, it protects the club well and has not been contested during the Kimia men’s basket, while the long-standing male basket is simply disqualified and the future of the two teams is not affected; secondly, two coaches are merely suspension of the trainee’s registration, i.e., they are not able to practise, but are theoretically able to perform other related work on basketball; and, in fact, they are less meaningful and not personalized.

For its part, this punishment is a loud, small, but less injurious.

But in any case, this has given the outside world a clear recipe, and the two coaches have banned the registration of the trainee, which is indeed a very heavy penalty, or even the possibility of interrupting the career, thus making the penalty somewhat screaming or larger and shattering some undesirable phenomena.

The decisive penalties of this Chinese basket association are, in fact, a “small mind” and merely a thumb of thought, which has a long mind.

FAC has long condoned all sorts of evil and bad behaviour: in the middle of the 2021 race, one of the lagging balloons is behind, and the naked negative competition can even be described as a balloon, with the result that it is not punishable. Even more madness is the fact that, after the improper statements of Lee and the exposure to bad behaviour, the General Directorate ordered the Chinese Federation to conduct itself in-house, so that it was not possible for the Association to take a place.

Eventually, a second challenge to the bottom line of the balloon, the bottom line of the challenging industry, the bottom line of the challenging regulatory layer, culminated in the removal of today’s two full-time officers and several middle-level officials responsible for country names, competitions and disciplinary sanctions.

In fact, China’s basketball has also suffered from many negative phenomena, the most obvious of which is that the basketball decision has always been a serious disaster for public opinion, and that it has been carried out in a blatant and unscrupulous manner. However, with the inauguration of a large number of FAC officials and the presence of mobile teams in the General Directorate, the Chinese basket association finally became aware of the right decision.

As a balloon, I hope that this basket association will have the courage of digging up and strengthening the management of adjudicators; as a soccer media, I would like more to see the Chinese Federation and China’s Basket Association (China) in the future in the face of ugly acts such as casinos, with real and constant courage and determination.