Share Dialog
Subscribe to Christian Futurism
Your smartphone buzzes with a friend suggestion on Facebook. Someone you met once at a conference three years ago, whose number you never saved. Meta's algorithm found them anyway, mining your location data, facial recognition, and shadow profiles to map relationships you never disclosed. Like King Saul's spies tracking David through the wilderness, Meta's surveillance network operates on fear: fear of missing connections, fear of losing relevance, fear of being left behind in the attention economy.
Scripture reveals this pattern in 1 Samuel 18:9: "Saul kept a jealous eye on David from that day forward." What began as insecurity metastasized into systematic surveillance, corrupting both the watcher and the watched. Meta's 20-year trajectory follows Saul's descent: from connecting Harvard students to constructing history's most comprehensive surveillance apparatus, all while claiming to "bring the world closer together."
If you've felt increasingly uneasy about Facebook's knowledge of your life; if you've wondered why Instagram shows ads for products you only thought about; if you've noticed WhatsApp pushing features that compromise the privacy it once promised, you're experiencing what David felt in the caves of En Gedi. The surveillance isn't a bug; it's the business model. And Scripture shows us exactly where this path leads.
The Hebrew word tsaphah (צָפָה) appears throughout Saul's surveillance narrative, meaning "to keep watch, to spy out, to observe from a hidden position." But Scripture distinguishes between legitimate watching (like watchmen protecting cities) and Saul's corrupted surveillance. 1 Samuel 23:19-23 details the systematic nature of Saul's intelligence network:
"Go and get more information. Find out where David usually goes and who has seen him there. They tell me he is very crafty. Find out about all the hiding places he uses and come back to me with definite information."
This passage reveals three elements that parallel Meta's surveillance architecture:
Comprehensive data collection ("get more information")
Behavioral pattern analysis ("where David usually goes")
Network mapping ("who has seen him there")
Meta didn't invent surveillance capitalism; they perfected what Saul pioneered. The company's own documents, revealed in the Facebook Papers, show executives knew their surveillance harmed users while expanding it anyway¹. Like Saul, who knew David was innocent yet continued hunting him, Meta's leadership chose power over principles.
The Greek word kataskopeo (κατασκοπέω) in the New Testament carries similar meaning but adds the element of hostile reconnaissance. When the Pharisees sent spies to watch Jesus (Luke 20:20), they engaged in kataskopeo: surveillance with malicious intent. Meta's business model depends on this same hostile reconnaissance of human behavior, transforming intimate details into advertiser gold².
When Frances Haugen released thousands of internal Meta documents in 2021, she exposed surveillance patterns that mirror Saul's methodology exactly. Just as Saul corrupted Israel's intelligence apparatus for personal vendetta, Meta corrupted social connection for profit maximization.
Consider Meta's "People You May Know" algorithm, which the company's own research showed could expose sensitive relationships: psychiatrists to patients, traumatic relationships, activists to each other³. Like Saul's network of informants in 1 Samuel 22:7-8, where he complained that "no one tells me when my son makes a covenant with the son of Jesse," Meta's algorithm reveals hidden relationships through surveillance rather than consent.
The WhatsApp acquisition in 2014 shows this perfectly. Meta purchased the encrypted messaging platform for $19 billion while promising to maintain its privacy focus. Within four years, WhatsApp's founders resigned over Meta's surveillance demands⁴. The platform that once championed privacy became another node in Meta's tracking network, monitoring message metadata, contact patterns, and behavioral signals despite encryption promises⁵.
Even more telling: Meta's response to Apple's App Tracking Transparency, which required user consent for cross-app tracking. Meta spent over $10 billion fighting privacy protection, claiming it would destroy small businesses⁶. Saul similarly claimed David threatened Israel's security, when in reality David's independence threatened Saul's control.
Meta embodies what we might call "The Data Sovereign": an entity that claims divine-like omniscience over human behavior while rejecting accountability for its power. Like Saul, who believed his position justified any surveillance necessary to maintain control, Meta operates under the delusion that connecting people justifies unlimited data extraction.
This goes beyond simple privacy violation. Meta's surveillance enables:
Behavioral manipulation at scale: Internal documents show Facebook deliberately amplified divisive content because anger drives engagement⁷
Shadow profiles of non-users: Meta tracks people who never joined Facebook through pixel tracking, contact uploads, and partner data⁸
Emotional experimentation: The 2014 emotional contagion study manipulated 689,000 users' emotions without consent⁹
Democracy subversion: Cambridge Analytica accessed 87 million profiles for political manipulation¹⁰
The theological significance becomes clear when we examine Saul's end. His surveillance state didn't protect his kingdom; it accelerated its destruction. 1 Samuel 31:4 records his ignoble death, abandoned by the very intelligence apparatus he built. Meta faces similar institutional decay: record FTC fines¹¹, congressional investigations¹², European regulatory action¹³, and most critically, generational user exodus as young people flee to platforms with less invasive surveillance¹⁴.
Rather than accepting Saul's surveillance state, David developed counter-surveillance strategies that protected his community while maintaining integrity. His approach offers five principles for escaping Meta's panopticon:
1. Practice Strategic Withdrawal David didn't announce his movements on Saul's networks. Similarly, consider platform fasting: regular periods completely offline to break algorithmic behavior mapping. Delete the apps, not just logout. Your spiritual formation matters more than your social graph.
2. Build Alternative Networks
David created loyal networks outside Saul's surveillance state (1 Samuel 22:1-2). Consider these options: Signal for messaging, Substack for thoughtful writing, or simply preferring one-on-one conversations over email or Signal. Ask yourself: if social media didn't consume your time connecting with acquaintances, would those relationships truly matter? Focus on depth over breadth.
3. Implement Information Discipline David's supporters learned operational security, never revealing his location to Saul's spies. Modern application looks like this: use pen names, create similar but not identical avatars, avoid giving out real emails or phone numbers. Try relay emails and burner numbers. Only share real contact information when absolutely necessary and the platform proves trustworthy. Your data is valuable intelligence requiring active protection.
4. Create Surveillance-Free Sanctuaries David found refuge in caves where Saul's spies couldn't reach. Every smart device in your home deserves scrutiny. Do you really need that smart doorbell recording every visitor? That voice assistant listening to family prayers? Disconnect what you can. Refuse participation in the surveillance network these devices weave through your home. Physical spaces free from digital eyes become spiritual sanctuaries.
5. Document the Surveillance David kept evidence of Saul's pursuit, later proving his innocence. Download your Meta data regularly (they're legally required to provide it¹⁵). Document their tracking. When you understand their surveillance patterns, you can resist them. Or better, remove yourself entirely.
Right now, while this truth burns fresh: request your data from Meta's platforms. The company legally must provide everything they've collected: every click, view, and invisible tracking pixel. When you see the thousands of pages documenting your digital life, you'll understand why David fled Saul's kingdom.
Three specific actions for today:
Audit your shadow profile: Search for yourself while logged out. Screenshot what Meta shows the world without your consent.
Map your data connections: Identify what Meta infers about you from others' uploads and tags. Document the invisible web.
Calculate your value: Meta makes approximately $60 per North American user quarterly¹⁶. You're not the customer; you're the product being surveilled and sold.
Share this article right now with three people who need to understand why their Facebook feed feels like Saul's spies closing in.
Then subscribe because every week I publish articles about your safety, sacred boundaries, and Biblical Wisdom for Contemporary Issues.
Consider this spiritual discipline: For every hour spent on Meta platforms, spend equal time in surveillance-free prayer and Scripture reading. Let David's psalms, written while evading Saul's surveillance, guide your digital resistance.
How has accepting corporate surveillance as "normal" shaped your understanding of privacy as a spiritual discipline rather than mere personal preference?
Where do you see Saul's fear-driven surveillance patterns in your own social media habits—tracking others obsessively or curating your image for the algorithm's approval?
What would change in your spiritual formation if you treated personal data with the same protective wisdom David showed while fleeing Saul's intelligence network?
Like what you're reading? Subscribe for biblical wisdom that exposes surveillance capitalism's spiritual dangers while providing practical frameworks for digital resistance. And if this resonated with you, share it with someone who needs to understand why their Facebook feed feels like Saul's spies closing in.
Christian Futurism is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Support This Work: Creating practical guides for protecting church communications requires extensive research into surveillance technologies, privacy tools, persecution reports, and biblical frameworks for digital stewardship. If this article helped you safeguard your spiritual community from algorithmic exploitation, consider supporting this ministry through BuyMeACoffee or Ko-fi. Your partnership enables continued investigation into how Big Tech weaponizes faith communities and development of biblical strategies for digital refuge.
¹Frances Haugen, Facebook Papers, Wall Street Journal (October 2021).
²Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism (PublicAffairs, 2019), 128-159.
³Kashmir Hill, "How Facebook Figures Out Everyone You've Ever Met," Gizmodo (November 7, 2017).
⁴Parmy Olson, "Exclusive: WhatsApp Cofounder Brian Acton Gives The Inside Story On #DeleteFacebook," Forbes (September 26, 2018).
⁵WhatsApp Security Crisis Report, Beyond the Firewall Research (January 2025), 3-4.
⁶Mark Zuckerberg, "Apple's iOS 14.5 Update," Facebook (March 2021).
⁷Jeff Horwitz, "Facebook Knows Instagram Is Toxic for Teen Girls," Wall Street Journal (September 14, 2021).
⁸Privacy International, "How Apps on Android Share Data with Facebook," (December 2018).
⁹Adam Kramer et al., "Experimental Evidence of Massive-Scale Emotional Contagion," PNAS 111.24 (2014).
¹⁰Federal Trade Commission, "FTC Imposes $5 Billion Penalty on Facebook," (July 24, 2019).
¹¹Ibid.
¹²House Energy and Commerce Committee, "Zuckerberg Testimony," (April 11, 2018).
¹³European Data Protection Board, "€225 Million Fine for WhatsApp," (September 2021).
¹⁴Edison Research, "The Infinite Dial 2024," (March 2024).
¹⁵Meta Privacy Center, "Download Your Information," (Accessed January 2025).
¹⁶Meta Platforms Inc., "Q3 2024 Earnings Report," (October 2024).
Rockefeller Kennedy
