Now we are at the beginning of the 19th century. It was here that I found for the first time that books written by women were placed on several bookshelves. But after I read the bookshelf, I couldn't help asking why, except for a few books, there are all novels in front of me? You should know that poetry is the original part of the creative impulse. "The Honor of Singers" is also a poetess. No matter in France or in England, female poets should precede female novelists. What's more, if you look at the four famous names, what do George Eliot and Emily Bronte have in common? Isn't Charlotte Bronte completely unable to understand Jane Austen? Except that they all have no children, it seems that they can be linked together. As long as four people can get together in a room, they are no more out of place than they are - so that it is assumed that their meeting and conversation can be so desirable.

However, when they began to write, they did not know what power was influencing them, so they all chose novels. Is it related to that they were born in the middle class, and I ask whether, as Miss Emily Davis clearly showed us later, in the early 19th century, middle-class family members shared a living room? If a woman wants to write, she has to write in a public room. Therefore, Miss Nightingale was so indignant - "A woman never belongs to herself for more than half an hour" - that she was always interrupted. Indeed, it is easier to write prose and novels than poetry or drama. Because there is no need to concentrate like that. Jane Austen wrote about the end of her life.

"She can accomplish all this," her nephew said when writing her memoirs. "It's surprising. Think about it, she doesn't even have a study, which means that she has to do most of the work in the shared living room and is interrupted from time to time by various circumstances. She is careful not to let servants, visitors or anyone outside her family suspect what she is doing." [49] Jane Austen hid the manuscript or covered it with a piece of blotting paper. Moreover, in the early nineteenth century, all the literary training women received was to observe characters and analyze emotions. For centuries, women's feelings have been nurtured in the busy living room. She was deeply impressed by all kinds of emotions, and all kinds of relationships between people were presented to her. Therefore, when a middle-class woman started writing, she naturally wrote novels. Although it seems right to say so, two of the four famous women we mentioned are not novelists in terms of their nature. Emily Bronte should have written poetry, and George Eliot's creative impulse belongs to history or biography, where she can display her talents in her broad bosom. But they all wrote novels. I took Pride and Prejudice off the shelf. I have to say that people can go further and say that they have written good novels. People can say that Pride and Prejudice is a good novel, which is neither boastful nor painful for men. In any case, it is never a shame to be found writing Pride and Prejudice.