To my kids and friends,
I wanted to take a moment to explain why I wrote this post on the existence of God and the truth of the Bible. As a believer in Jesus Christ, I have proclaimed Him as my Lord and Savior. However, I also have moments of doubt, just like many of you may have experienced. Questions about the fossil record, DNA, and other topics can sometimes make us question our beliefs and where they come from.
I believe it's natural and even helpful to question our faith and understand where our beliefs come from. I am not a blind follower, but rather an intelligent human being who wants to process my thoughts and understand my faith better.
I wrote this post to help me remember the different ways we can know and understand God's existence and the truth of the Bible. I hope it can also help you in case you have similar questions or doubts. I know the post is long and heavy, but I urge you to take the time to read it and engage with it.
Thanks for taking the time to read this, and know that I love you all very much.
Love, Dad
xoxoxo
Is the Bible true? It's a question that has been asked and debated for centuries, and one that continues to elicit a wide range of opinions and interpretations. Some people view the Bible as an infallible guide to truth and morality, while others see it as a collection of stories and myths that are open to interpretation. But what does it mean for something to be "true" in the first place? In this post, we'll explore the complex and nuanced question of whether the Bible is true by delving into the different theories of truth that have been developed by philosophers and scholars over the years. By going down the deep rabbit hole of truth, we hope to provide you with a more nuanced and sophisticated understanding of this important question, and to help you approach biblical interpretation with a more critical and open-minded perspective.
We will start with one of my favorite quotes on the topic of truth.
There are many different theories of truth, each of which offers a unique perspective on what it means for something to be "true." Here are a few of the most common theories of truth:
Coherence theory of truth: Truth is when statements or beliefs are logically consistent and fit into a larger system of beliefs or ideas that are already accepted as true. For example, if you believe that honesty is always the best policy, but then lie to your friend to avoid hurting their feelings, your beliefs are not logically consistent.
Correspondence theory of truth: Truth is when statements or beliefs accurately correspond to the objective reality of the world. For example, if you say "the sky is blue" on a clear day, your statement corresponds to the objective reality of the blue sky.
Pragmatic theory of truth: Truth is when statements or beliefs are useful or effective in achieving certain goals or outcomes. For example, if you take a medicine that relieves your headache, even if it did not accurately diagnose the cause of your headache, it was still true in the sense that it was useful and effective.
Alethic pluralism: Truth can take different forms depending on the context or domain of inquiry. For example, the truth about a sunset can be described by a scientist who talks about atmospheric conditions and a poet who talks about beauty and emotion.
Relativism: Truth is relative to the cultural, historical, or linguistic context in which it is used. For example, in some cultures, direct eye contact during conversation is seen as disrespectful, while in others, it is seen as a sign of honesty and confidence.
As we explore the many faces of truth, it can be helpful to think about the analogy of giving a cat a bath. We've all heard that cats hate water, and trying to give them a bath can be a messy and difficult task. In the same way, trying to pin down the "truth" of the Bible can be a tricky and complicated process. There are many different theories of truth, each offering a unique perspective on what it means for something to be "true."
For example, the coherence theory of truth suggests that the Bible would be considered true if it presents a consistent and logical worldview, like a cat who is less likely to scratch you if you approach it calmly and consistently. Meanwhile, the correspondence theory of truth would require us to examine the historical accuracy of the Bible's claims, evaluating its claims in light of scientific knowledge and other forms of evidence, like trying to get a cat to sit still in a tub of water.
The question of whether the Bible is true is a complex and nuanced one, and the answer depends on how one defines "truth." Let's explore how each theory of truth that we discussed earlier can be used to approach this question:
According to the coherence theory of truth, the truth of the Bible would depend on how well its various statements and teachings fit together into a coherent system of beliefs. In other words, the Bible would be considered true if it presents a consistent and logical worldview.
The correspondence theory of truth suggests that the truth of the Bible would depend on how accurately its statements correspond to objective reality. This view would require us to examine the historical accuracy of the Bible's claims and evaluate its claims in light of scientific knowledge and other forms of evidence.
The pragmatic theory of truth would evaluate the Bible based on its usefulness or effectiveness in achieving certain goals or outcomes. For example, some might argue that the Bible is true because it provides a moral framework that guides people to live good and meaningful lives.
Alethic pluralism would suggest that there may be multiple different types of truth related to the Bible. For example, the Bible may contain historical truths, ethical truths, and spiritual truths, each of which would need to be evaluated differently.
Finally, relativism would suggest that the truth of the Bible is relative to the cultural, historical, and linguistic context in which it is used. In other words, different interpretations of the Bible may be considered true in different contexts.
These different theories of truth suggest that there are many different ways to approach the question of whether the Bible is true. Ultimately, the answer depends on how one defines "truth" and how one evaluates the Bible based on that definition. It's important to keep in mind that people have different interpretations of the Bible and that the truth of the Bible may be a matter of personal belief rather than objective fact.
One perspective on truth that has gained prominence in recent decades is postmodernism, which emphasizes the subjectivity and relativity of truth. This perspective suggests that there is no objective or universal truth that exists independently of individual perspectives or experiences. While this perspective can be useful in some contexts, it can be problematic when applied to biblical interpretation.
For example, if we reject the idea of objective truth when it comes to the Bible, we may be more likely to interpret the text in ways that support our preexisting beliefs or biases, rather than engaging with the text in an open-minded and critical manner. Additionally, if we view truth as relative or subjective, we may be less likely to engage with other interpretations of the Bible that challenge our own beliefs, which can limit our ability to learn and grow.
John Vervaeke, a cognitive psychologist and professor of psychology at the University of Toronto, has defined the four ways of knowing as follows:
Perspectival knowing: the ability to know through perception, using our senses to gather information about the world.
Propositional knowing: the ability to know through reason, using logic and critical thinking to analyze and make sense of information.
Participatory knowing: the ability to know through engagement, using our emotions, feelings, and bodily experiences to engage with the world around us.
Presentational knowing: the ability to know through expression, using language and other forms of expression, such as art, music, or dance, to communicate and convey knowledge.
“It’s good to know that knowledge isn't just limited to book smarts, but also includes things like gut feelings and dance moves.”
To use the four ways of knowing to "Know the Bible is true," we can apply them in the following ways:
Perspectival knowing: We can use our perception to engage with the Bible by reading and interpreting its words and stories. By paying attention to the details and nuances in the text, we can develop a deeper understanding of its meaning and message.
Propositional knowing: We can use reason to analyze and make sense of the Bible's teachings and claims. This involves critically evaluating the historical and cultural context in which the Bible was written and examining its claims in light of scientific and empirical evidence.
Participatory knowing: We can use our emotions and bodily experiences to engage with the Bible and its teachings. This involves developing a personal relationship with the text and allowing it to shape our beliefs, values, and attitudes.
Presentational knowing: We can use language and other forms of expression, such as art or music, to communicate and convey the truths found in the Bible. This involves using creative and imaginative means to convey the Bible's message in a way that resonates with us and others.
By using all four ways of knowing, we can develop a more comprehensive and holistic understanding of the Bible and its teachings. This approach recognizes that knowing the truth of the Bible is not just a matter of intellectual analysis, but also involves engaging with the text on an emotional and personal level. It also recognizes that different individuals may approach the Bible from different ways of knowing, and that this can lead to different interpretations and understandings of its truths.
Christians often struggle when engaging in debates with atheists about God and the Bible. One reason for this is that Christians tend to rely heavily on scientific-style knowing when trying to defend their beliefs, while atheists tend to rely more on other ways of knowing, such as propositional and perspectival knowing.
Scientific-style knowing is focused on empirical evidence and logical reasoning, which can be very effective in certain contexts, such as in the natural sciences. However, when it comes to discussing spiritual beliefs, scientific-style knowing may not be the most appropriate or effective approach. This is because spiritual beliefs are often based on subjective experiences, personal interpretations, and a range of other factors that cannot be easily evaluated using scientific-style knowing.
Atheists, on the other hand, tend to rely on other ways of knowing that are more subjective and personal. For example, they may base their beliefs on their own experiences, their interpretation of philosophical arguments, or their understanding of the social and cultural context in which they live. These forms of knowing are less focused on empirical evidence and more focused on personal interpretation and understanding.
To have more productive discussions with atheists, Christians must acknowledge the inadequacy of relying solely on scientific-style knowing and be willing to engage in conversations that encompass different forms of knowing. This requires a deeper understanding of the subjective and personal nature of spiritual beliefs, an openness to various interpretations and perspectives, and effective communication of these beliefs in a respectful and engaging manner.
Rather than trying to win an argument or convince the other person of one's own beliefs, the purpose of engaging in conversations with atheists about God and the Bible should be to cultivate a space for open and respectful dialogue, where each perspective is valued and heard.
If you're looking to evaluate whether the Bible is true, here are some practical tips that can help you apply the different theories of truth discussed in this post:
Coherence theory of truth: To evaluate the coherence of the Bible's teachings, read and compare different passages and teachings in the Bible. Look for consistency in the teachings and see if they form a coherent system of beliefs.
Correspondence theory of truth: To evaluate the correspondence of the Bible's claims, study the historical context in which the Bible was written and the scientific evidence related to its claims. Look for evidence that supports or contradicts the Bible's claims.
Pragmatic theory of truth: To evaluate the pragmatic value of the Bible, reflect on how the Bible has impacted your life and the lives of those around you. Look for examples of how the Bible's teachings have been useful or effective in achieving certain goals or outcomes.
Alethic pluralism: To evaluate the different types of truth related to the Bible, consider the historical, ethical, and spiritual aspects of the Bible. Look for examples of how the Bible has provided guidance and insights in these different domains.
Relativism: To evaluate the cultural, historical, or linguistic context in which the Bible is used, study different interpretations of the Bible from different cultures and time periods. Look for similarities and differences in these interpretations and reflect on how they relate to your own interpretation of the Bible.
By using these practical tips, you can apply the different theories of truth to evaluate whether the Bible is true and gain a deeper understanding of the complexities and nuances of this important question.
Additional Tip: When engaging in discussions about the Bible with people who hold different beliefs, listen actively and approach the conversation with an open mind. Try to understand their perspective and avoid making assumptions or jumping to conclusions. By engaging in respectful dialogue, you may gain insights into different ways of knowing and develop a more nuanced and sophisticated understanding of the Bible and its teachings.
The question of whether the Bible is true is a complex and nuanced one that requires us to consider a range of different perspectives and interpretations. By exploring the different theories of truth, we can see that the answer to this question depends on how we define "truth" and how we evaluate the Bible based on that definition.
Rather than trying to provide a definitive answer to this question, it's important to recognize that different people may have different interpretations of the Bible and that the truth of the Bible may be a matter of personal belief rather than objective fact. What's important is that we approach biblical interpretation with an open mind, a willingness to engage with different perspectives, and a commitment to critical thinking and inquiry.
In the end, going down the deep rabbit hole of truth can be a rewarding and enlightening experience, one that challenges us to think deeply about the nature of knowledge, belief, and understanding. I hope that this post has given you a better appreciation for the complexities of the question of whether the Bible is true, and that it inspires you to continue exploring these important and fascinating questions.
Leave your thoughts and experiences in the comments below. Here's a few questions to get you started.
Which type of knowing resonates with you the most in terms of your belief in the existence of God and the truth of the Bible?
How has your personal experience or engagement with the Bible shaped your understanding of its truth and relevance in today's world?
Have you ever had a moment or experience that convinced you of the existence of a higher power or God?
You can comment below or on this twitter post or on this facebook post.
If you want to get notified of future posts then smash the subscribe button below.
If you want to send this to someone the hit the share button below.
To view other posts, just click the icon in the upper left of this page or hit this link.
Subscribe to Common Ground to receive new posts directly to your inbox.
