Don't talk about gender, just opinions. I think of one of my predecessors, who was a very senior media person and then turned to advertising. Once, she had an argument with a brand customer. Both of them were a little upset. The other person suddenly said, "You call your boss. I won't talk to a whining woman like you." The senior immediately responded, "We both have emotions in this dispute. It has nothing to do with gender. At the same time, I represent the interests of the company. Please don't talk to me about gender when I'm talking to you about things." At one point or another, women in the workplace have had to seriously emphasize that they don't talk about gender, just opinions. The emphasis itself is frustrating. But at least we're still in the workplace, and we can challenge this irrational notion, but many of my students compromise. For example, in the face of the conflict between career and family, they will give up their career development, thinking that "there is no way, there is only one person to contribute to the family, it is me"; Faced with a new challenge or opportunity, their first thought is "I might not be ready. Look at that guy. He's so confident." In the face of difficulties, their first thought is "I do tend to be emotional, girls just have natural limitations."

We expressed it again and again, wrote a lot of articles and did a lot of courses, but I felt more powerless because of it. And so the first self-overthrow happened -- I began to desexualize expression. In my narrative subjects, women are no longer the protagonists, and the protagonists become individuals, both male and female. Women's special identity dilemmas, such as the difficulty of having children, will play a part but not be the main topic. Desexualizing expression is not about ignoring the reality of gender, but about helping a person become more powerful. I recall a study in which academics at Stanford and Columbia found that women who focused on the similarities between men and women (" gender neutral ") reported greater feelings of power and confidence than women who focused on femininity (" gender sensitivity "). The researchers concluded that women benefited more by playing down gender. We can still empathize with the plight of women, but we need to go one step further than just empathizing. Yes, it's hard. So what can be done? Hermann Hesse said, "Some people think that holding on makes us stronger, but sometimes, letting go is." With some of the past precipitation, we start again. In this way, we put forward the core concept of "advantaged education". We believe that each individual has their own unique advantages, it has nothing to do with family, starting point, wealth, status, everyone has, but in the secular concept, we are used to look at the results, look at the ranking, look at the standard, ignore the unique advantages of individuals. We are so used to focusing on our weaknesses that we lose sight of the fact that only our strengths will make us successful. Drucker, the management guru, said that most highly competitive companies act like highly competitive countries, concentrating on their strengths and ditching their weaknesses. The same applies to individuals. I really like a book called The Power of Now. The opening story of the book is a profound one. There was once a beggar who sat by the roadside for more than 30 years. One day, a stranger passed by. The beggar mechanically lifted his old baseball cap and muttered, "Give me some." The stranger said, "I have nothing to give you." Then he asked, "What are you sitting on?" The beggar replied, "Nothing. It's just an old box that I've been sitting on for as long as I can remember." The stranger asked, "Have you ever opened a box?" "No." The beggar said, "What's the use? There's nothing in it." The stranger insisted, "Open the box and have a look." The beggar then tried to open the box. Then something unexpected happened. The beggar was full of wonder and ecstasy: the chest was full of gold. I love this story and have told it again and again over the years. A beggar finds a treasure in his treasure chest. You might think this is a story about luck, but it is not. It tells us that when we look for achievement and security, we ignore that we already have what we want. You don't have to look elsewhere for the truth. It's within you. Advantage education, is to help each individual find their own truth. Driven by this concept, we completed the upgrade from strength assessment to customized training camp.

The reason for this is that most of the courses in the market, including the one we used to have, are for the public. Everyone has different advantages, so customization is a better idea. The Advantage Development Camp and the Advantage Management Advanced Camp help each individual to discover their own advantages, to believe that they have advantages, and then to play their own advantages. This process took us two years. Don't talk about gender, just opinions. I think of one of my predecessors, who was a very senior media person and then turned to advertising. Once, she had an argument with a brand customer. Both of them were a little upset. The other person suddenly said, "You call your boss. I won't talk to a whining woman like you." The senior immediately responded, "We both have emotions in this dispute. It has nothing to do with gender. At the same time, I represent the interests of the company. Please don't talk to me about gender when I'm talking to you about things." At one point or another, women in the workplace have had to seriously emphasize that they don't talk about gender, just opinions. The emphasis itself is frustrating. But at least we're still in the workplace, and we can challenge this irrational notion, but many of my students compromise. For example, in the face of the conflict between career and family, they will give up their career development, thinking that "there is no way, there is only one person to contribute to the family, it is me"; Faced with a new challenge or opportunity, their first thought is "I might not be ready. Look at that guy. He's so confident." In the face of difficulties, their first thought is "I do tend to be emotional, girls just have natural limitations." We expressed it again and again, wrote a lot of articles and did a lot of courses, but I felt more powerless because of it. And so the first self-overthrow happened -- I began to desexualize expression. In my narrative subjects, women are no longer the protagonists, and the protagonists become individuals, both male and female. Women's special identity dilemmas, such as the difficulty of having children, will play a part but not be the main topic. Desexualizing expression is not about ignoring the reality of gender, but about helping a person become more powerful. I recall a study in which academics at Stanford and Columbia found that women who focused on the similarities between men and women (" gender neutral ") reported greater feelings of power and confidence than women who focused on femininity (" gender sensitivity "). The researchers concluded that women benefited more by playing down gender. We can still empathize with the plight of women, but we need to go one step further than just empathizing. Yes, it's hard. So what can be done? Hermann Hesse said, "Some people think that holding on makes us stronger, but sometimes, letting go is." With some of the past precipitation, we start again. In this way, we put forward the core concept of "advantaged education". We believe that each individual has their own unique advantages, it has nothing to do with family, starting point, wealth, status, everyone has, but in the secular concept, we are used to look at the results, look at the ranking, look at the standard, ignore the unique advantages of individuals. We are so used to focusing on our weaknesses that we lose sight of the fact that only our strengths will make us successful. Drucker, the management guru, said that most highly competitive companies act like highly competitive countries, concentrating on their strengths and ditching their weaknesses. The same applies to individuals. I really like a book called The Power of Now. The opening story of the book is a profound one. There was once a beggar who sat by the roadside for more than 30 years. One day, a stranger passed by.

Don't talk about gender, just opinions. I think of one of my predecessors, who was a very senior media person and then turned to advertising. Once, she had an argument with a brand customer. Both of them were a little upset. The other person suddenly said, "You call your boss. I won't talk to a whining woman like you." The senior immediately responded, "We both have emotions in this dispute. It has nothing to do with gender. At the same time, I represent the interests of the company. Please don't talk to me about gender when I'm talking to you about things." At one point or another, women in the workplace have had to seriously emphasize that they don't talk about gender, just opinions. The emphasis itself is frustrating. But at least we're still in the workplace, and we can challenge this irrational notion, but many of my students compromise. For example, in the face of the conflict between career and family, they will give up their career development, thinking that "there is no way, there is only one person to contribute to the family, it is me"; Faced with a new challenge or opportunity, their first thought is "I might not be ready. Look at that guy. He's so confident." In the face of difficulties, their first thought is "I do tend to be emotional, girls just have natural limitations."

We expressed it again and again, wrote a lot of articles and did a lot of courses, but I felt more powerless because of it. And so the first self-overthrow happened -- I began to desexualize expression. In my narrative subjects, women are no longer the protagonists, and the protagonists become individuals, both male and female. Women's special identity dilemmas, such as the difficulty of having children, will play a part but not be the main topic. Desexualizing expression is not about ignoring the reality of gender, but about helping a person become more powerful. I recall a study in which academics at Stanford and Columbia found that women who focused on the similarities between men and women (" gender neutral ") reported greater feelings of power and confidence than women who focused on femininity (" gender sensitivity "). The researchers concluded that women benefited more by playing down gender. We can still empathize with the plight of women, but we need to go one step further than just empathizing. Yes, it's hard. So what can be done? Hermann Hesse said, "Some people think that holding on makes us stronger, but sometimes, letting go is." With some of the past precipitation, we start again. In this way, we put forward the core concept of "advantaged education". We believe that each individual has their own unique advantages, it has nothing to do with family, starting point, wealth, status, everyone has, but in the secular concept, we are used to look at the results, look at the ranking, look at the standard, ignore the unique advantages of individuals. We are so used to focusing on our weaknesses that we lose sight of the fact that only our strengths will make us successful. Drucker, the management guru, said that most highly competitive companies act like highly competitive countries, concentrating on their strengths and ditching their weaknesses. The same applies to individuals. I really like a book called The Power of Now. The opening story of the book is a profound one. There was once a beggar who sat by the roadside for more than 30 years. One day, a stranger passed by. The beggar mechanically lifted his old baseball cap and muttered, "Give me some." The stranger said, "I have nothing to give you." Then he asked, "What are you sitting on?" The beggar replied, "Nothing. It's just an old box that I've been sitting on for as long as I can remember." The stranger asked, "Have you ever opened a box?" "No." The beggar said, "What's the use? There's nothing in it." The stranger insisted, "Open the box and have a look." The beggar then tried to open the box. Then something unexpected happened. The beggar was full of wonder and ecstasy: the chest was full of gold. I love this story and have told it again and again over the years. A beggar finds a treasure in his treasure chest. You might think this is a story about luck, but it is not. It tells us that when we look for achievement and security, we ignore that we already have what we want. You don't have to look elsewhere for the truth. It's within you. Advantage education, is to help each individual find their own truth. Driven by this concept, we completed the upgrade from strength assessment to customized training camp.

The reason for this is that most of the courses in the market, including the one we used to have, are for the public. Everyone has different advantages, so customization is a better idea. The Advantage Development Camp and the Advantage Management Advanced Camp help each individual to discover their own advantages, to believe that they have advantages, and then to play their own advantages. This process took us two years. Don't talk about gender, just opinions. I think of one of my predecessors, who was a very senior media person and then turned to advertising. Once, she had an argument with a brand customer. Both of them were a little upset. The other person suddenly said, "You call your boss. I won't talk to a whining woman like you." The senior immediately responded, "We both have emotions in this dispute. It has nothing to do with gender. At the same time, I represent the interests of the company. Please don't talk to me about gender when I'm talking to you about things." At one point or another, women in the workplace have had to seriously emphasize that they don't talk about gender, just opinions. The emphasis itself is frustrating. But at least we're still in the workplace, and we can challenge this irrational notion, but many of my students compromise. For example, in the face of the conflict between career and family, they will give up their career development, thinking that "there is no way, there is only one person to contribute to the family, it is me"; Faced with a new challenge or opportunity, their first thought is "I might not be ready. Look at that guy. He's so confident." In the face of difficulties, their first thought is "I do tend to be emotional, girls just have natural limitations." We expressed it again and again, wrote a lot of articles and did a lot of courses, but I felt more powerless because of it. And so the first self-overthrow happened -- I began to desexualize expression. In my narrative subjects, women are no longer the protagonists, and the protagonists become individuals, both male and female. Women's special identity dilemmas, such as the difficulty of having children, will play a part but not be the main topic. Desexualizing expression is not about ignoring the reality of gender, but about helping a person become more powerful. I recall a study in which academics at Stanford and Columbia found that women who focused on the similarities between men and women (" gender neutral ") reported greater feelings of power and confidence than women who focused on femininity (" gender sensitivity "). The researchers concluded that women benefited more by playing down gender. We can still empathize with the plight of women, but we need to go one step further than just empathizing. Yes, it's hard. So what can be done? Hermann Hesse said, "Some people think that holding on makes us stronger, but sometimes, letting go is." With some of the past precipitation, we start again. In this way, we put forward the core concept of "advantaged education". We believe that each individual has their own unique advantages, it has nothing to do with family, starting point, wealth, status, everyone has, but in the secular concept, we are used to look at the results, look at the ranking, look at the standard, ignore the unique advantages of individuals. We are so used to focusing on our weaknesses that we lose sight of the fact that only our strengths will make us successful. Drucker, the management guru, said that most highly competitive companies act like highly competitive countries, concentrating on their strengths and ditching their weaknesses. The same applies to individuals. I really like a book called The Power of Now. The opening story of the book is a profound one. There was once a beggar who sat by the roadside for more than 30 years. One day, a stranger passed by.