"If Louise Brooks knew how men controlled her image now, she'd scream. If she knew they were whitewashing it, she'd scream louder."

That is the logline Charlotte Siller submitted with A Curious Idol to the DCP Award for Base Creators.

Kinda blunt... a little angry... very accurate.

Before we get into the details, here's a few things that stood out to me during my conversation with Charlotte.

1. Independent filmmaking is tough (I know, we've been here before), but, at the heart of it are the stories... and where better to find them, than in life itself?

2. In Charlotte's words, "human stories are not tied to a time." If it's still relevant 10 years later to you, it's most likely still relevant as a whole.

3. You don't need to do it fast. Take a bit of that pressure off!

4. Take a page out of Lulu's many brilliantly annotated books, and don't dilute yourself to fit someone else's standard. Guess what? Decentralization helps you do that ;)

Let's get to it, shall we?

PS: if you feel a rebel inside you stir, welcome.

Louise Brooks is mostly remembered as a silent-era icon. The irony is that she was anything but.

She was outspoken, incisive, and deeply unwilling to compromise. "My way or the high way"," as Charlotte puts it, while remaining "kind... warm, and wonderful" to the people she cared about. What history preserved instead was a fragment: the haircut, the image, the mythology. Somewhere along the patriarchy, the mind was forgotten.

A Curious Idol is on a mission to correct that imbalance.

Charlotte, researcher and filmmaker, isn't interested in retelling a familiar legend. She spent over a decade immersed in Lulu's archives, journals, letters, and marginalia, to honor Brooks' philosophy: the search for truth.

What first pushed the project beyond research and into filmmaking was the gap Charlotte kept encountering between Louise's own words and how she's portrayed today. In her journals, Brooks appears as a woman who read and annotated Proust repeatedly, published essays advocating for women in Hollywood when few dared to, and held herself to an almost ruthless standard of self-accountability.

Online, she's often flattened into a symbol, frequently filtered through the male gaze.

That contradiction made Charlotte angry. It also made the project necessary (10 years ago, today, and in the future.)

Because Charlotte never met Louise, she knew she couldn’t claim authorship over her truth. Instead, she built the film around Louise’s own voice and the testimonies of those who knew her best.

The result is a documentary with a research edge: interview-backed, archival, and intentionally resistant to myth-making.

During our conversation, Charlotte spoke about discovering Lulu in Hollywood while studying film history, and how shocked she was by the clarity and depth of Brooks’ writing. That moment led her deeper: into biographies, archives, and eventually into Rochester, New York, where Brooks spent her later years. What followed was years of digging through letters, journals, and fragments of a life Louise herself was actively trying to understand and preserve.

There’s a reverence in the way Charlotte talks about archives. Almost as if they're living things. Sitting with those materials, she says, was the most fulfilling experience she’s ever had. Not because it was nostalgic, but because it was honest.

Louise didn’t write to flatter herself. She wrote to see clearly, and above all, to learn.

That commitment to truth shaped everything about A Curious Idol, including how Charlotte thinks about ownership and legacy today.

Louise Brooks spent decades fighting attempts to possess her image. Thirty years after her death, those same struggles play out online: images recirculated, words stripped of context, meaning diluted through repetition. Charlotte half-joked that if NFTs and zero-knowledge proofs had existed in the 1980s, Brooks would’ve used them. But the point underneath the humor is serious: artists deserve agency over their work, even after they’re gone.

That’s where Web3 enters the picture.

Charlotte has worked in blockchain for most of her career, and she’s clear-eyed about its limits. But she also sees its strengths: transparency, provenance, and the ability to anchor a source of truth. Onchain distribution won’t solve every problem in documentary filmmaking, but it can protect context, preserve authorship, and help prevent the kind of narrative drift Louise’s legacy has endured.

What lingers most for Charlotte, after all these years inside Louise Brooks’ world, is her refusal to soften herself for acceptance. Brooks didn’t dilute her intelligence to appear palatable.

She stood up for other women, called out hypocrisy, and approached life with a sharp sense of humor.

That unyielding autonomy is the throughline between them.

A Curious Idol isn’t just a documentary about Louise Brooks. It’s a reclamation of voice, authorship, and really, of self.

Here's to more of us learning to not dilute ourselves, kids.

"If Louise Brooks knew how men controlled her image now, she'd scream. If she knew they were whitewashing it, she'd scream louder."

That is the logline Charlotte Siller submitted with A Curious Idol to the DCP Award for Base Creators.

Kinda blunt... a little angry... very accurate.

Before we get into the details, here's a few things that stood out to me during my conversation with Charlotte.

1. Independent filmmaking is tough (I know, we've been here before), but, at the heart of it are the stories... and where better to find them, than in life itself?

2. In Charlotte's words, "human stories are not tied to a time." If it's still relevant 10 years later to you, it's most likely still relevant as a whole.

3. You don't need to do it fast. Take a bit of that pressure off!

4. Take a page out of Lulu's many brilliantly annotated books, and don't dilute yourself to fit someone else's standard. Guess what? Decentralization helps you do that ;)

Let's get to it, shall we?

PS: if you feel a rebel inside you stir, welcome.

Louise Brooks is mostly remembered as a silent-era icon. The irony is that she was anything but.

She was outspoken, incisive, and deeply unwilling to compromise. "My way or the high way"," as Charlotte puts it, while remaining "kind... warm, and wonderful" to the people she cared about. What history preserved instead was a fragment: the haircut, the image, the mythology. Somewhere along the patriarchy, the mind was forgotten.

A Curious Idol is on a mission to correct that imbalance.

Charlotte, researcher and filmmaker, isn't interested in retelling a familiar legend. She spent over a decade immersed in Lulu's archives, journals, letters, and marginalia, to honor Brooks' philosophy: the search for truth.

What first pushed the project beyond research and into filmmaking was the gap Charlotte kept encountering between Louise's own words and how she's portrayed today. In her journals, Brooks appears as a woman who read and annotated Proust repeatedly, published essays advocating for women in Hollywood when few dared to, and held herself to an almost ruthless standard of self-accountability.

Online, she's often flattened into a symbol, frequently filtered through the male gaze.

That contradiction made Charlotte angry. It also made the project necessary (10 years ago, today, and in the future.)

Because Charlotte never met Louise, she knew she couldn’t claim authorship over her truth. Instead, she built the film around Louise’s own voice and the testimonies of those who knew her best.

The result is a documentary with a research edge: interview-backed, archival, and intentionally resistant to myth-making.

During our conversation, Charlotte spoke about discovering Lulu in Hollywood while studying film history, and how shocked she was by the clarity and depth of Brooks’ writing. That moment led her deeper: into biographies, archives, and eventually into Rochester, New York, where Brooks spent her later years. What followed was years of digging through letters, journals, and fragments of a life Louise herself was actively trying to understand and preserve.

There’s a reverence in the way Charlotte talks about archives. Almost as if they're living things. Sitting with those materials, she says, was the most fulfilling experience she’s ever had. Not because it was nostalgic, but because it was honest.

Louise didn’t write to flatter herself. She wrote to see clearly, and above all, to learn.

That commitment to truth shaped everything about A Curious Idol, including how Charlotte thinks about ownership and legacy today.

Louise Brooks spent decades fighting attempts to possess her image. Thirty years after her death, those same struggles play out online: images recirculated, words stripped of context, meaning diluted through repetition. Charlotte half-joked that if NFTs and zero-knowledge proofs had existed in the 1980s, Brooks would’ve used them. But the point underneath the humor is serious: artists deserve agency over their work, even after they’re gone.

That’s where Web3 enters the picture.

Charlotte has worked in blockchain for most of her career, and she’s clear-eyed about its limits. But she also sees its strengths: transparency, provenance, and the ability to anchor a source of truth. Onchain distribution won’t solve every problem in documentary filmmaking, but it can protect context, preserve authorship, and help prevent the kind of narrative drift Louise’s legacy has endured.

What lingers most for Charlotte, after all these years inside Louise Brooks’ world, is her refusal to soften herself for acceptance. Brooks didn’t dilute her intelligence to appear palatable.

She stood up for other women, called out hypocrisy, and approached life with a sharp sense of humor.

That unyielding autonomy is the throughline between them.

A Curious Idol isn’t just a documentary about Louise Brooks. It’s a reclamation of voice, authorship, and really, of self.

Here's to more of us learning to not dilute ourselves, kids.