I found it difficult to pin down the title because there are many related topics. However, let’s start by talking about TRUST first.

The nature of blockchain is irreversible — that’s well known. This means every transaction decision can have serious repercussions.

From a UX perspective, most decentralised products still have a long way to go. For instance, you may feel confused when there’s a lack of feedback or response after you’ve confirmed an action like “Claim.” ( oops, where it went…)

Both CEX and DeFi products carry the risk of being hacked. For users new to Web3, understanding how digital signatures work during transactions can be overwhelming.

Unlike traditional finance, blockchain allows users to verify independently — for example, a digital signature can be verified by anyone who has the sender’s public key.

Take a pause.

We can assume most customers are new to Web3. Therefore, jargon-heavy products destroy trust instantly. Add a UI lacking clarity and real-time feedback, and that’s a recipe for hell disaster.

Motion plays an essential role in all my Web3 projects.
When we talk about motion, we shouldn’t confuse it with UI animation only. Some principles overlap — for example, micro-interactions and movement — but motion design defines how customers perceive your brand and overall UX strategy.

Motion UX is a strategic tool that guides Web3 users.
There are a few key principles for building motion patterns in the Web3 verification process.

Rather than listing abstract principles, let’s see how to apply them in real use cases.

Most end users don’t know how to verify the authenticity of a payment link or any sender request from the blockchain.
A guided verification process can use motion purposefully — for example, verifying the sender’s Web3 public profile.
Compared to a wall of text instructions, this provides real-time, continuous feedback.

Oftentimes we overlook how natural movement can guide users. The completion of block should be perceived to be securly united following by the rules of neutral physics.

• Permission — when authorising, motion can indicate security and full access

• Approval — during verification, motion helps users understand when and how a process will be completed

I found it difficult to pin down the title because there are many related topics. However, let’s start by talking about TRUST first.

The nature of blockchain is irreversible — that’s well known. This means every transaction decision can have serious repercussions.

From a UX perspective, most decentralised products still have a long way to go. For instance, you may feel confused when there’s a lack of feedback or response after you’ve confirmed an action like “Claim.” ( oops, where it went…)

Both CEX and DeFi products carry the risk of being hacked. For users new to Web3, understanding how digital signatures work during transactions can be overwhelming.

Unlike traditional finance, blockchain allows users to verify independently — for example, a digital signature can be verified by anyone who has the sender’s public key.

Take a pause.

We can assume most customers are new to Web3. Therefore, jargon-heavy products destroy trust instantly. Add a UI lacking clarity and real-time feedback, and that’s a recipe for hell disaster.

Motion plays an essential role in all my Web3 projects.
When we talk about motion, we shouldn’t confuse it with UI animation only. Some principles overlap — for example, micro-interactions and movement — but motion design defines how customers perceive your brand and overall UX strategy.

Motion UX is a strategic tool that guides Web3 users.
There are a few key principles for building motion patterns in the Web3 verification process.

Rather than listing abstract principles, let’s see how to apply them in real use cases.

Most end users don’t know how to verify the authenticity of a payment link or any sender request from the blockchain.
A guided verification process can use motion purposefully — for example, verifying the sender’s Web3 public profile.
Compared to a wall of text instructions, this provides real-time, continuous feedback.

Oftentimes we overlook how natural movement can guide users. The completion of block should be perceived to be securly united following by the rules of neutral physics.

• Permission — when authorising, motion can indicate security and full access

• Approval — during verification, motion helps users understand when and how a process will be completed