There is a Catch-22 in the “creator economy” and it goes like this: publish consistently at a high velocity (preferably every day) so that you get enough eyeballs so that enough people subscribe so that enough people pay you so that you can create full-time so that you have enough time to publish co

There is a Catch-22 in the “creator economy” and it goes like this: publish consistently at a high velocity (preferably every day) so that you get enough eyeballs so that enough people subscribe so that enough people pay you so that you can create full-time so that you have enough time to publish co

Instead of 10x Thinking, consider /10 Thinking. What if, instead of going 10 times bigger or 10 times faster, you went 10 times smaller? Or 10 times slower? What would you create?

Instead of 10x Thinking, consider /10 Thinking. What if, instead of going 10 times bigger or 10 times faster, you went 10 times smaller? Or 10 times slower? What would you create?

"Publishing" is a word that no longer makes sense. What is missing in the "creator economy" is a strong curatorial element. Good work must be created, and it must be identified, amplified, and stored for the future.

"Publishing" is a word that no longer makes sense. What is missing in the "creator economy" is a strong curatorial element. Good work must be created, and it must be identified, amplified, and stored for the future.

A lot of writing advice boils down to the same idea: go fast. But writing pace, like voice, is an individualized component, and that exploring different paces can unlock your best work.

A lot of writing advice boils down to the same idea: go fast. But writing pace, like voice, is an individualized component, and that exploring different paces can unlock your best work.