DurwinBurger King gave candy to a worker has worked for more than 20 years.
The Whopper, which was first introduced in 1957, was a quarter-pound, oversized burger on a vast five-inch bun that cost a reasonable 29 cents.Large corporations can be cruel and uncaring. They often claim to care about their employees, but sometimes the reality can be quite different. This is the story of Kevin Ford, a cook and cashier at Burger King who had worked tirelessly for over two decades. To celebrate his remarkable feat of never taking a sick day, Burger King decided to shower him ...
DurwinSomeone crashed the entire Onion market in America, made millions, walked away scott-free and starte…
We learnt that perfect monopoly can cause catastrophic damage to any economy, even the onion market.A tiny man who rocked America with Onions History doesn’t repeat, but it rhymes. You want to learn something, anything? Look back in history and it will surprise you just how eerily relevant it can be even in modern times. With the advent of Bitcoin, Cryptocurrencies, Tech titans and startups, you get all sorts of happenings like Tulip Mania, recessions, Feds stepping in, market manipulations a...
DurwinThe youngest self-made billionaire just bought Forbes.
Austin Russell is an American entrepreneur, founder and CEO of Luminar Technologies. Luminar specializes in lidar and machine perception technologies, mainly used in autonomous cars. Luminar went public in December 2020, making him the world’s youngest self-made billionaire at the age of 25.Wha’s up with billionaires and news media? In a stunning turn of events, Austin Russell, the youngest self-made billionaire of 2021, has made headlines once again by acquiring a majority stake in Forbes ma...
CEO of StartupX | DeFi, NFT, Crypto, Web3.0 Builder | Co-Founder at IxSA | Director of Startup Weekend Singapore | Sustainability Champion
DurwinBurger King gave candy to a worker has worked for more than 20 years.
The Whopper, which was first introduced in 1957, was a quarter-pound, oversized burger on a vast five-inch bun that cost a reasonable 29 cents.Large corporations can be cruel and uncaring. They often claim to care about their employees, but sometimes the reality can be quite different. This is the story of Kevin Ford, a cook and cashier at Burger King who had worked tirelessly for over two decades. To celebrate his remarkable feat of never taking a sick day, Burger King decided to shower him ...
DurwinSomeone crashed the entire Onion market in America, made millions, walked away scott-free and starte…
We learnt that perfect monopoly can cause catastrophic damage to any economy, even the onion market.A tiny man who rocked America with Onions History doesn’t repeat, but it rhymes. You want to learn something, anything? Look back in history and it will surprise you just how eerily relevant it can be even in modern times. With the advent of Bitcoin, Cryptocurrencies, Tech titans and startups, you get all sorts of happenings like Tulip Mania, recessions, Feds stepping in, market manipulations a...
DurwinThe youngest self-made billionaire just bought Forbes.
Austin Russell is an American entrepreneur, founder and CEO of Luminar Technologies. Luminar specializes in lidar and machine perception technologies, mainly used in autonomous cars. Luminar went public in December 2020, making him the world’s youngest self-made billionaire at the age of 25.Wha’s up with billionaires and news media? In a stunning turn of events, Austin Russell, the youngest self-made billionaire of 2021, has made headlines once again by acquiring a majority stake in Forbes ma...
CEO of StartupX | DeFi, NFT, Crypto, Web3.0 Builder | Co-Founder at IxSA | Director of Startup Weekend Singapore | Sustainability Champion
Subscribe to Durwin
Subscribe to Durwin
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
<100 subscribers
<100 subscribers
That man is Zuckerberg himself of course.
And he did what no other CEO would ever do.
He grabbed the Vision Pro right after it released, tested it and did a review of it.
It seemed genuine, off the cuff, very real and honest.
It was a bold move.
The Meta CEO, in a rare personal Instagram post, declared Meta’s Quest 3 not just a better value, but a superior product to Apple’s Vision Pro.
This is akin to throwing down the virtual gauntlet in the bustling arena of tech titans.
But to be fair, he did it with poise, style and a refreshing candor.
He didn’t diss or sprayed negativity all over the Vision Pro.
Zuckerberg’s candid critique, casually delivered from his couch, came across as honest and pragmatic.
Everyone was impressed at the fact that he actually did a review and did it with style.
Well of course he had to side with the Quest 3.
He claims that the Quest 3 surpasses Apple’s Vision Pro in core areas, despite its significantly lower price tag.
It’s an audacious assertion, especially considering Apple’s storied reputation for high-end, quality products.
He argues that the Quest 3 offers comparable mixed-reality capabilities to the Vision Pro but at a fraction of the cost.
The price disparity is stark: Meta’s headset starts at $500, while Apple’s vision commands a hefty $3,500.
For many, this price point is a critical factor, and Zuckerberg is keen to capitalize on it.
Comfort is another battleground.
The Quest 3 weighs notably less than the Vision Pro, potentially reducing the physical strain on users.
This is not a trivial matter in the world of wearable tech, where user comfort can make or break the experience.
You wouldn’t wear a watch that is a few grams heavier or a few mm too “large”.
It kinda matters.
Zuckerberg acknowledges the Vision Pro’s superior screen resolution and its “really nice” eye-tracking function.
Yet, he quickly pivots back to emphasizing Quest’s advantages, including its wider field of view.
See what he did?
He painted both sides of the fence and subtly leaned towards the Quest 3.
Artful and strategic.
Younger Zuck wouldn’t have bothered.
He paints a picture of a more immersive experience with the Quest, a crucial aspect for users seeking to dive deep into virtual worlds.
But the real ace up Meta’s sleeve, according to Zuckerberg, is the depth of the Quest’s immersive content library.
Meta has been building its virtual and mixed-reality game repertoire for years, a fact that Zuckerberg is rightly proud of.
This vast library could be a significant draw for users seeking a diverse range of virtual experiences.
Zuckerberg’s critique, however, is not without its biases.
As the head of Meta, his vested interest in promoting the Quest 3 is clear.
Obviously he is biased.
Imagine your CEO doing a review watched by millions and praising the competition.
Yet, his points raise valid considerations about the design and functionality choices that shape the user experience in mixed reality headsets.
But come on.
Both products are clearly targeting different kinds of audience here.
Zuckerberg, with his personal investment in the metaverse, is championing a future where virtual experiences are accessible, immersive, and diverse.
A device people can easily afford and be placed in every school, house or office.
Apple, on the other hand, with its history of premium, high-quality products, is betting on a future where technology seamlessly blends with reality, albeit at a premium cost.
Apple’s Vision Pro is a version 1 and its super high-end.
More for the enthusiasts and the influencer to review.
I think Apple will develop a cheaper version, gun for the premium market and Zuck will go more mainstream and emphasize on affordability.
Both will carve a spot in the market.
Until Elon puts a brain chip in our skulls and change the universe as we know it.
=)
-
Which is better?
Apple Vision Pro
Meta Quest 3
-
#MetaVsApple #Quest3 #VisionPro #MixedReality #VirtualReality #TechnologyRivalry #MarkZuckerberg #AppleTech #MetaQuest #VRHeadsets #TechShowdown #InnovationRace #DigitalFuture #UserExperience #TechComparison #VRGaming #TechLeaders #FutureOfVR #ImmersiveTech #VirtualWorlds #TechTrends #ZuckerbergVsApple #ConsumerChoice #TechBattle #VirtualInnovation #DigitalExperiences #TechDebate #MarketLeaders #FutureTech
That man is Zuckerberg himself of course.
And he did what no other CEO would ever do.
He grabbed the Vision Pro right after it released, tested it and did a review of it.
It seemed genuine, off the cuff, very real and honest.
It was a bold move.
The Meta CEO, in a rare personal Instagram post, declared Meta’s Quest 3 not just a better value, but a superior product to Apple’s Vision Pro.
This is akin to throwing down the virtual gauntlet in the bustling arena of tech titans.
But to be fair, he did it with poise, style and a refreshing candor.
He didn’t diss or sprayed negativity all over the Vision Pro.
Zuckerberg’s candid critique, casually delivered from his couch, came across as honest and pragmatic.
Everyone was impressed at the fact that he actually did a review and did it with style.
Well of course he had to side with the Quest 3.
He claims that the Quest 3 surpasses Apple’s Vision Pro in core areas, despite its significantly lower price tag.
It’s an audacious assertion, especially considering Apple’s storied reputation for high-end, quality products.
He argues that the Quest 3 offers comparable mixed-reality capabilities to the Vision Pro but at a fraction of the cost.
The price disparity is stark: Meta’s headset starts at $500, while Apple’s vision commands a hefty $3,500.
For many, this price point is a critical factor, and Zuckerberg is keen to capitalize on it.
Comfort is another battleground.
The Quest 3 weighs notably less than the Vision Pro, potentially reducing the physical strain on users.
This is not a trivial matter in the world of wearable tech, where user comfort can make or break the experience.
You wouldn’t wear a watch that is a few grams heavier or a few mm too “large”.
It kinda matters.
Zuckerberg acknowledges the Vision Pro’s superior screen resolution and its “really nice” eye-tracking function.
Yet, he quickly pivots back to emphasizing Quest’s advantages, including its wider field of view.
See what he did?
He painted both sides of the fence and subtly leaned towards the Quest 3.
Artful and strategic.
Younger Zuck wouldn’t have bothered.
He paints a picture of a more immersive experience with the Quest, a crucial aspect for users seeking to dive deep into virtual worlds.
But the real ace up Meta’s sleeve, according to Zuckerberg, is the depth of the Quest’s immersive content library.
Meta has been building its virtual and mixed-reality game repertoire for years, a fact that Zuckerberg is rightly proud of.
This vast library could be a significant draw for users seeking a diverse range of virtual experiences.
Zuckerberg’s critique, however, is not without its biases.
As the head of Meta, his vested interest in promoting the Quest 3 is clear.
Obviously he is biased.
Imagine your CEO doing a review watched by millions and praising the competition.
Yet, his points raise valid considerations about the design and functionality choices that shape the user experience in mixed reality headsets.
But come on.
Both products are clearly targeting different kinds of audience here.
Zuckerberg, with his personal investment in the metaverse, is championing a future where virtual experiences are accessible, immersive, and diverse.
A device people can easily afford and be placed in every school, house or office.
Apple, on the other hand, with its history of premium, high-quality products, is betting on a future where technology seamlessly blends with reality, albeit at a premium cost.
Apple’s Vision Pro is a version 1 and its super high-end.
More for the enthusiasts and the influencer to review.
I think Apple will develop a cheaper version, gun for the premium market and Zuck will go more mainstream and emphasize on affordability.
Both will carve a spot in the market.
Until Elon puts a brain chip in our skulls and change the universe as we know it.
=)
-
Which is better?
Apple Vision Pro
Meta Quest 3
-
#MetaVsApple #Quest3 #VisionPro #MixedReality #VirtualReality #TechnologyRivalry #MarkZuckerberg #AppleTech #MetaQuest #VRHeadsets #TechShowdown #InnovationRace #DigitalFuture #UserExperience #TechComparison #VRGaming #TechLeaders #FutureOfVR #ImmersiveTech #VirtualWorlds #TechTrends #ZuckerbergVsApple #ConsumerChoice #TechBattle #VirtualInnovation #DigitalExperiences #TechDebate #MarketLeaders #FutureTech
No activity yet