DurwinBurger King gave candy to a worker has worked for more than 20 years.
The Whopper, which was first introduced in 1957, was a quarter-pound, oversized burger on a vast five-inch bun that cost a reasonable 29 cents.Large corporations can be cruel and uncaring. They often claim to care about their employees, but sometimes the reality can be quite different. This is the story of Kevin Ford, a cook and cashier at Burger King who had worked tirelessly for over two decades. To celebrate his remarkable feat of never taking a sick day, Burger King decided to shower him ...
DurwinSomeone crashed the entire Onion market in America, made millions, walked away scott-free and starte…
We learnt that perfect monopoly can cause catastrophic damage to any economy, even the onion market.A tiny man who rocked America with Onions History doesn’t repeat, but it rhymes. You want to learn something, anything? Look back in history and it will surprise you just how eerily relevant it can be even in modern times. With the advent of Bitcoin, Cryptocurrencies, Tech titans and startups, you get all sorts of happenings like Tulip Mania, recessions, Feds stepping in, market manipulations a...
DurwinThe youngest self-made billionaire just bought Forbes.
Austin Russell is an American entrepreneur, founder and CEO of Luminar Technologies. Luminar specializes in lidar and machine perception technologies, mainly used in autonomous cars. Luminar went public in December 2020, making him the world’s youngest self-made billionaire at the age of 25.Wha’s up with billionaires and news media? In a stunning turn of events, Austin Russell, the youngest self-made billionaire of 2021, has made headlines once again by acquiring a majority stake in Forbes ma...
CEO of StartupX | DeFi, NFT, Crypto, Web3.0 Builder | Co-Founder at IxSA | Director of Startup Weekend Singapore | Sustainability Champion
DurwinBurger King gave candy to a worker has worked for more than 20 years.
The Whopper, which was first introduced in 1957, was a quarter-pound, oversized burger on a vast five-inch bun that cost a reasonable 29 cents.Large corporations can be cruel and uncaring. They often claim to care about their employees, but sometimes the reality can be quite different. This is the story of Kevin Ford, a cook and cashier at Burger King who had worked tirelessly for over two decades. To celebrate his remarkable feat of never taking a sick day, Burger King decided to shower him ...
DurwinSomeone crashed the entire Onion market in America, made millions, walked away scott-free and starte…
We learnt that perfect monopoly can cause catastrophic damage to any economy, even the onion market.A tiny man who rocked America with Onions History doesn’t repeat, but it rhymes. You want to learn something, anything? Look back in history and it will surprise you just how eerily relevant it can be even in modern times. With the advent of Bitcoin, Cryptocurrencies, Tech titans and startups, you get all sorts of happenings like Tulip Mania, recessions, Feds stepping in, market manipulations a...
DurwinThe youngest self-made billionaire just bought Forbes.
Austin Russell is an American entrepreneur, founder and CEO of Luminar Technologies. Luminar specializes in lidar and machine perception technologies, mainly used in autonomous cars. Luminar went public in December 2020, making him the world’s youngest self-made billionaire at the age of 25.Wha’s up with billionaires and news media? In a stunning turn of events, Austin Russell, the youngest self-made billionaire of 2021, has made headlines once again by acquiring a majority stake in Forbes ma...
CEO of StartupX | DeFi, NFT, Crypto, Web3.0 Builder | Co-Founder at IxSA | Director of Startup Weekend Singapore | Sustainability Champion
Subscribe to Durwin
Subscribe to Durwin
<100 subscribers
<100 subscribers
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Someone just paid 10x more for a punk!
Say you want to buy an NFT.
You’re browsing through NFTs, and you stumble upon CryptoPunk #5363.
Without a second thought, you place a bid, but instead of 65.5 ETH, your fingers slip, and you bid a whopping 655 ETH.
That’s over $1.5 million for a pixelated digital avatar.
Oops!
Wait.
Is that even humanly possible?
When I saw this news, I was in disbelief.
That is too difficult a mistake to make.
A person savvy enough to make a purchase of $1.5M cannot be so careless.
Yes accidents happen, but not that likely when you are trying to buy some high-end luxury NFT.
The buyer, whose identity remains shrouded in mystery, paid ten times the going rate for a CryptoPunk.
Now, there are two theories floating around.
One is a classic “fat finger” mistake, and the other, a more strategic “wash trade.”
Let’s talk about the fat finger theory first.
It’s exactly what it sounds like — an accidental, costly click.
If this was the case, it’s a painful reminder of the unforgiving nature of blockchain transactions.
There’s no undo button in crypto, folks.
It’s the digital equivalent of accidentally dropping a gold bar in a bottomless well.
You can try to contact OpenSea or whatever exchange or even the seller to see if they would entertain you.
On the flip side, we have the wash trade theory.
For those uninitiated, wash trading is a sneaky way to create a false market buzz.
It involves buying and selling an asset to oneself to give the illusion of high demand and trading volume.
While it’s illegal in regulated markets, the Wild West of crypto provides fertile ground for such schemes.
If this was a wash trade, it was a bold move, maybe intended to evade taxes or launder money.
Not that I’m condoning such behavior, but if I had to choose, I think the probability of it be a strategic move is higher than that of an expensive slip-up.
The impact of this sale on the NFT market was immediate.
The global NFT market saw a 14% surge, with Ethereum-based NFTs, especially CryptoPunks, leading the charge.
It’s fascinating how one transaction can send ripples through an entire market.
What can I say.
People are reactive, greedy and panicky buyers.
Whether it was a mistake or a maneuver, they now own a piece of digital art history.
CryptoPunks, after all, is one of the pioneering NFT projects.
This collection of 10,000 unique, algorithmically generated characters has turned into a status symbol in the crypto world.
During the NFT mania, punks were so highly sought after like it was the last cup of water in the desert.
In the end, whether it was a blunder or a bluff, CryptoPunk #5363’s sale is a tale that will be told in crypto lore for years to come.
Nobody will truly ever know unless the buyer reveals it.
But let me ask you — if you had the $1.5 million to spare, would you gamble it on a digital collectible, or would your “finger” have other plans?
-
Have you heard of NFT wash trading?
-
#CryptoPunk5363 #NFTs #Ethereum #Blockchain #DigitalArt #CryptoMistake #FatFinger #WashTrade #CryptoMarket #NFTInvestment #DigitalCollectibles #CryptoLore #CryptoBuzz #NFTCommunity #DigitalEconomy #BlockchainTransaction #AccidentalPurchase #MarketManipulation #CryptoRegulations
Someone just paid 10x more for a punk!
Say you want to buy an NFT.
You’re browsing through NFTs, and you stumble upon CryptoPunk #5363.
Without a second thought, you place a bid, but instead of 65.5 ETH, your fingers slip, and you bid a whopping 655 ETH.
That’s over $1.5 million for a pixelated digital avatar.
Oops!
Wait.
Is that even humanly possible?
When I saw this news, I was in disbelief.
That is too difficult a mistake to make.
A person savvy enough to make a purchase of $1.5M cannot be so careless.
Yes accidents happen, but not that likely when you are trying to buy some high-end luxury NFT.
The buyer, whose identity remains shrouded in mystery, paid ten times the going rate for a CryptoPunk.
Now, there are two theories floating around.
One is a classic “fat finger” mistake, and the other, a more strategic “wash trade.”
Let’s talk about the fat finger theory first.
It’s exactly what it sounds like — an accidental, costly click.
If this was the case, it’s a painful reminder of the unforgiving nature of blockchain transactions.
There’s no undo button in crypto, folks.
It’s the digital equivalent of accidentally dropping a gold bar in a bottomless well.
You can try to contact OpenSea or whatever exchange or even the seller to see if they would entertain you.
On the flip side, we have the wash trade theory.
For those uninitiated, wash trading is a sneaky way to create a false market buzz.
It involves buying and selling an asset to oneself to give the illusion of high demand and trading volume.
While it’s illegal in regulated markets, the Wild West of crypto provides fertile ground for such schemes.
If this was a wash trade, it was a bold move, maybe intended to evade taxes or launder money.
Not that I’m condoning such behavior, but if I had to choose, I think the probability of it be a strategic move is higher than that of an expensive slip-up.
The impact of this sale on the NFT market was immediate.
The global NFT market saw a 14% surge, with Ethereum-based NFTs, especially CryptoPunks, leading the charge.
It’s fascinating how one transaction can send ripples through an entire market.
What can I say.
People are reactive, greedy and panicky buyers.
Whether it was a mistake or a maneuver, they now own a piece of digital art history.
CryptoPunks, after all, is one of the pioneering NFT projects.
This collection of 10,000 unique, algorithmically generated characters has turned into a status symbol in the crypto world.
During the NFT mania, punks were so highly sought after like it was the last cup of water in the desert.
In the end, whether it was a blunder or a bluff, CryptoPunk #5363’s sale is a tale that will be told in crypto lore for years to come.
Nobody will truly ever know unless the buyer reveals it.
But let me ask you — if you had the $1.5 million to spare, would you gamble it on a digital collectible, or would your “finger” have other plans?
-
Have you heard of NFT wash trading?
-
#CryptoPunk5363 #NFTs #Ethereum #Blockchain #DigitalArt #CryptoMistake #FatFinger #WashTrade #CryptoMarket #NFTInvestment #DigitalCollectibles #CryptoLore #CryptoBuzz #NFTCommunity #DigitalEconomy #BlockchainTransaction #AccidentalPurchase #MarketManipulation #CryptoRegulations
No activity yet