You know how powerful generative AI tech is when the city of New York is banning teachers and students alike, from using ChatGPT.

ChatGPT is quite potent.

It can do some seriously mind-boggling things like suggest a fitness routine, write you a poem and even make jokes in Obama’s tone.

But what if students start using it for their work, writing essays and doing assignments?

What if teachers use it for marking assignments and automating their workflow?

Where do we draw the line?

If there is even one.

“Due to concerns about negative impacts on student learning, and concerns regarding the safety and accuracy of content, access to ChatGPT is restricted on New York City Public Schools’ networks and devices,” education department spokesperson Jenna Lyle told Motherboard in a statement. “While the tool may be able to provide quick and easy answers to questions, it does not build critical-thinking and problem-solving skills, which are essential for academic and lifelong success.”

The planet of education and learning has just be rocked with a comet called ChatGPT and has effectively shifted off its orbit.

So meet GPTZero.

I tested it with one of my essays and it works!

Quite a bit of analysis was done although the user interface could be improved.

It was designed by a Princeton University student, Edward Tian, and it seems to be a weekend project.

Simply put, you paste the entire text into the website and it analyses it.

It looks for perplexity and burstiness and other nuances that regular joes like you and I don’t even think about.

Then it spits out numbers and gives you a final verdict on whether the text is human or AI generated.

Nifty eh?

For a weekend project, it would have been pretty cool.

Given the current context and climate where AI is supposedly taking over the world and NYC banning schools from using ChatGPT, its MARVELOUSLY well-timed.

This is going to blow up.

I want to invest in Edward already!

A keen sense of timing the market, when there is a strong demand for such a formidable tool.

A strong bias to action, coding and building this website up swiftly.

A good pedigree, I mean its Princeton, what else do we need to say?

Edward is going to have a powerful addition to his resume already when this thing takes off like FalconX to the moon.

Can already smell the queue of VCs lining up to invest in him.

Ok calm down.

This is still a rudimentary version and I am sure there will so many edge cases where it fails.

It is after all, a percentage result, not a certainty.

Parts of the essay could still be largely written by a human and certain text lifted from AI.

Where do we draw the line on what is too much AI?

But it offers us a glimpse into the future where we use AI to combat AI.

Where possibly the only way to out-think and out-smart the very AI that we created, is to use more AI.

What an increasingly perplexing and amazing world humans have created for our future generations.

Is it possible or even fair to ban technology from the hands of students?

Can we have the tech to differentiate what is written by AI and what is written by humans?

How do we even combat AI-generated content?

Do we need to?

-

Should ChatGPT be allowed in schools?

-

#startups #business #startupx #growth #success #socialmedia #culture #entrepreneurship #strategy #eth #btc #crypto #sifu #sifutoken #quadrigacx #NFT #profits #meme #tvl #defi

You know how powerful generative AI tech is when the city of New York is banning teachers and students alike, from using ChatGPT.

ChatGPT is quite potent.

It can do some seriously mind-boggling things like suggest a fitness routine, write you a poem and even make jokes in Obama’s tone.

But what if students start using it for their work, writing essays and doing assignments?

What if teachers use it for marking assignments and automating their workflow?

Where do we draw the line?

If there is even one.

“Due to concerns about negative impacts on student learning, and concerns regarding the safety and accuracy of content, access to ChatGPT is restricted on New York City Public Schools’ networks and devices,” education department spokesperson Jenna Lyle told Motherboard in a statement. “While the tool may be able to provide quick and easy answers to questions, it does not build critical-thinking and problem-solving skills, which are essential for academic and lifelong success.”

The planet of education and learning has just be rocked with a comet called ChatGPT and has effectively shifted off its orbit.

So meet GPTZero.

I tested it with one of my essays and it works!

Quite a bit of analysis was done although the user interface could be improved.

It was designed by a Princeton University student, Edward Tian, and it seems to be a weekend project.

Simply put, you paste the entire text into the website and it analyses it.

It looks for perplexity and burstiness and other nuances that regular joes like you and I don’t even think about.

Then it spits out numbers and gives you a final verdict on whether the text is human or AI generated.

Nifty eh?

For a weekend project, it would have been pretty cool.

Given the current context and climate where AI is supposedly taking over the world and NYC banning schools from using ChatGPT, its MARVELOUSLY well-timed.

This is going to blow up.

I want to invest in Edward already!

A keen sense of timing the market, when there is a strong demand for such a formidable tool.

A strong bias to action, coding and building this website up swiftly.

A good pedigree, I mean its Princeton, what else do we need to say?

Edward is going to have a powerful addition to his resume already when this thing takes off like FalconX to the moon.

Can already smell the queue of VCs lining up to invest in him.

Ok calm down.

This is still a rudimentary version and I am sure there will so many edge cases where it fails.

It is after all, a percentage result, not a certainty.

Parts of the essay could still be largely written by a human and certain text lifted from AI.

Where do we draw the line on what is too much AI?

But it offers us a glimpse into the future where we use AI to combat AI.

Where possibly the only way to out-think and out-smart the very AI that we created, is to use more AI.

What an increasingly perplexing and amazing world humans have created for our future generations.

Is it possible or even fair to ban technology from the hands of students?

Can we have the tech to differentiate what is written by AI and what is written by humans?

How do we even combat AI-generated content?

Do we need to?

-

Should ChatGPT be allowed in schools?

-

#startups #business #startupx #growth #success #socialmedia #culture #entrepreneurship #strategy #eth #btc #crypto #sifu #sifutoken #quadrigacx #NFT #profits #meme #tvl #defi