We don't use enough emojis

That had to be my first sentence.

Why would anyone need to write in an age of abundant AI writing? 🤷‍♂️

I'm not sure. People say AI only rephrase what it has learned, but humans do too. The only difference is that AI has yet to capture the full extent of human experiences in the real world 👀

In my opinion, creativity emerges from cross-disciplinary knowledge, cross-culture approaches, and combinations of brain glitches with environmental accidents.

At this stage of history, I would trust an LLM's opinion as much as a human, since humans hallucinate even more than AI algorithms Take the example of a doctor, they usually assess a condition using what they learned at school 10 to 40 years ago. Would you rather believe someone using their limited knowledge and out-of-date information, or an algorithm that absorbed all of the internet including the latest papers in the medical field? 👀

All that to say: I want to write about the future 🤘

The most important innovation of our century won't be AI. It's not obvious, it's not instantaneous, and you're allowed to disagree with me. The future will be unimaginably better thanks to web3.

Some features of the blockchain such as uniqueness and immutability are VERY hard for the human brain to conceive. Take this article, you can mint it as an NFT. That action will be recorded forever and immutable. Forever.

We are still barely realising the impact of having photos and videos of people from birth to death, but until now, all that data about someone will likely be shelved and forgotten. Historians will have some data about the 2000s ... but historians will have all the data from the 2050s and onwards. Immutable

Over a series of articles I would like to present a vision of the future, my vision of the future, where web3 changes everything, AI accelerates everything, quantum computing amplifies everything 🚀

We don't use enough emojis

That had to be my first sentence.

Why would anyone need to write in an age of abundant AI writing? 🤷‍♂️

I'm not sure. People say AI only rephrase what it has learned, but humans do too. The only difference is that AI has yet to capture the full extent of human experiences in the real world 👀

In my opinion, creativity emerges from cross-disciplinary knowledge, cross-culture approaches, and combinations of brain glitches with environmental accidents.

At this stage of history, I would trust an LLM's opinion as much as a human, since humans hallucinate even more than AI algorithms Take the example of a doctor, they usually assess a condition using what they learned at school 10 to 40 years ago. Would you rather believe someone using their limited knowledge and out-of-date information, or an algorithm that absorbed all of the internet including the latest papers in the medical field? 👀

All that to say: I want to write about the future 🤘

The most important innovation of our century won't be AI. It's not obvious, it's not instantaneous, and you're allowed to disagree with me. The future will be unimaginably better thanks to web3.

Some features of the blockchain such as uniqueness and immutability are VERY hard for the human brain to conceive. Take this article, you can mint it as an NFT. That action will be recorded forever and immutable. Forever.

We are still barely realising the impact of having photos and videos of people from birth to death, but until now, all that data about someone will likely be shelved and forgotten. Historians will have some data about the 2000s ... but historians will have all the data from the 2050s and onwards. Immutable

Over a series of articles I would like to present a vision of the future, my vision of the future, where web3 changes everything, AI accelerates everything, quantum computing amplifies everything 🚀