<100 subscribers
1. The Information Wall Has Reversed—AI Is Now the Fog Machine
The original edge of Web3 “research” was simple: spot the signal before the crowd. In 2018 a GitHub commit history or a token-economics PDF still told you something. Today the same artefacts are generated on demand—white papers, code repos, audit reports, even on-chain wash-trading patterns—by fine-tuned models that know exactly what VCs want to see. I know because I ghost-wrote some of them. The cost of faking credibility has collapsed to a few GPU hours, while the cost of verifying it has exploded to weeks of forensic work. Public information is no longer asymmetric—it’s adversarial.
---
2. Price and Value Have Divorced—Tokens Are Now Purely Narrative Derivatives
A technically exquisite L2 can stall at a $50 m FDV while a dog-themed JPEG with AI-generated memes does a 50× in two weeks. The reason: the people who build the product no longer control the token. Market-making rights are auctioned off to specialist desks at launch; the same desks that write the unlock calendar and the “news flow”. Good news becomes the perfect exit ramp. Fundamental analysis is reduced to theatre criticism: you are not evaluating tech, you are second-guessing the exit strategy of a book-runner you will never meet.
---
3. Meme > Tech—Flow Is the Only Fundamental Left
In the current cycle the winning diligence question is not “Does it scale?” but “Can it trend?”. Community heat, emoji density, influencer screen-time—these are the new cash-flow statements. A meticulous report on data availability sampling will get 300 Medium claps; a one-page “X-to-earn” meme with a pink logo trends for 48 hours and pumps 8×. When the market’s utility function is attention, deep research becomes a negative-yield activity: you pay with time and opportunity cost, yet harvest nothing but self-righteousness.
---
4. The Only Remaining Value of Research Is Self-Protection
I still read code, token designs and governance forums—but only to keep myself from stepping on obvious land-mines, not to find alpha. Public “research” articles have become loss-leaders whose true business model is Discord invite → paid group → private placement → exit liquidity. I tried the funnel for a month; the ROI lay in selling the shovel, not digging for gold. So I shut it down.
---
5. If You Don’t Know the Cap-Table, You Don’t Know the Project
In Web3 the cap-table is encoded in SAFTs, OTC warrants, locked NFTs, off-chain options and handshake agreements in Dubai hotel suites. None of these appear in Notion docs. “Understanding” now means mapping who paid what, at which vesting cliff, and whose cousin runs the market-making desk. That map is drawn in private Telegram chats, not in public GitHub repos. Without it, even the most elegant tech audit is just a pantomime of knowledge.
---
Epilogue: Buffett Was Right—Stick to What You Can Actually Understand
The sentence I underlined five years ago—“Never invest in a business you cannot understand”—finally makes sense. In Web3 “understanding” is not parsing solidity code or tokenomics diagrams; it is seeing the unseen wiring of incentives, egos and exit doors. Since that wiring is deliberately hidden, the rational default is non-participation. Research hasn’t lost its value—it has simply retreated to its only honest purpose: keeping you from betting on illusions you were never meant to see.
1. The Information Wall Has Reversed—AI Is Now the Fog Machine
The original edge of Web3 “research” was simple: spot the signal before the crowd. In 2018 a GitHub commit history or a token-economics PDF still told you something. Today the same artefacts are generated on demand—white papers, code repos, audit reports, even on-chain wash-trading patterns—by fine-tuned models that know exactly what VCs want to see. I know because I ghost-wrote some of them. The cost of faking credibility has collapsed to a few GPU hours, while the cost of verifying it has exploded to weeks of forensic work. Public information is no longer asymmetric—it’s adversarial.
---
2. Price and Value Have Divorced—Tokens Are Now Purely Narrative Derivatives
A technically exquisite L2 can stall at a $50 m FDV while a dog-themed JPEG with AI-generated memes does a 50× in two weeks. The reason: the people who build the product no longer control the token. Market-making rights are auctioned off to specialist desks at launch; the same desks that write the unlock calendar and the “news flow”. Good news becomes the perfect exit ramp. Fundamental analysis is reduced to theatre criticism: you are not evaluating tech, you are second-guessing the exit strategy of a book-runner you will never meet.
---
3. Meme > Tech—Flow Is the Only Fundamental Left
In the current cycle the winning diligence question is not “Does it scale?” but “Can it trend?”. Community heat, emoji density, influencer screen-time—these are the new cash-flow statements. A meticulous report on data availability sampling will get 300 Medium claps; a one-page “X-to-earn” meme with a pink logo trends for 48 hours and pumps 8×. When the market’s utility function is attention, deep research becomes a negative-yield activity: you pay with time and opportunity cost, yet harvest nothing but self-righteousness.
---
4. The Only Remaining Value of Research Is Self-Protection
I still read code, token designs and governance forums—but only to keep myself from stepping on obvious land-mines, not to find alpha. Public “research” articles have become loss-leaders whose true business model is Discord invite → paid group → private placement → exit liquidity. I tried the funnel for a month; the ROI lay in selling the shovel, not digging for gold. So I shut it down.
---
5. If You Don’t Know the Cap-Table, You Don’t Know the Project
In Web3 the cap-table is encoded in SAFTs, OTC warrants, locked NFTs, off-chain options and handshake agreements in Dubai hotel suites. None of these appear in Notion docs. “Understanding” now means mapping who paid what, at which vesting cliff, and whose cousin runs the market-making desk. That map is drawn in private Telegram chats, not in public GitHub repos. Without it, even the most elegant tech audit is just a pantomime of knowledge.
---
Epilogue: Buffett Was Right—Stick to What You Can Actually Understand
The sentence I underlined five years ago—“Never invest in a business you cannot understand”—finally makes sense. In Web3 “understanding” is not parsing solidity code or tokenomics diagrams; it is seeing the unseen wiring of incentives, egos and exit doors. Since that wiring is deliberately hidden, the rational default is non-participation. Research hasn’t lost its value—it has simply retreated to its only honest purpose: keeping you from betting on illusions you were never meant to see.


Share Dialog
Share Dialog
No comments yet