What is the difference of knowledge kept in printed paper from those kept in digital forms? This couldn't seem to me as a more interesting question, the fundamental difference is where we could bring the magic of technology into.

It’s the connection.

(People are always saying, "yeah I knew this for ages, it looks like something, it similar to xxx ideas but they are super hard, tried and failed or not working so far …" but the thing is the things that are “working” also not satisfy you.) i love Ted nelson said about idea has its variation.

wherever there are ideas there are variations, but no matter what, the question still is similar.

The web now gives us one answer, yes we can search for anything we wanted, but connection is another story.

Connection should be something that automatically be built every time you *build)) it.

*in my view Connection is not something we purposely prove but the things we are naturally doing all the time. When we read, esp when we read and write. When we choose to read a piece and we find the connection, and then we carry it in our writing, and when we look back we see the interactive memory formed.

I want to keep record of the relationship in the graph, and in the future no matter what I create, what brings alongside the creation will be distributed via the graph. (The simplest form is I [mentioned] you .eth and we form a relations graph, visibly or I reference your block-under you public key and we form an idea graph)

some work is necessarily coz that shows how much you want it.

I also don’t think the social media really helps in making the connection, it just makes the traffic system so well, and let people just forget themselves and please everyone who easily gives out his/her random little ♥️ .

I think the network theory of understanding the complex system will help in understanding the question. I think the beauty of a network is that you are able to do the things you want , find the people you want through 6 persons (theory), but you have to proof the work and the technology here is to help you build up the connections, make it more visible and scalable. it is not here to guide you from large average samples

We actually don’t want that much of relationship until we need help.

i thinks the mission of technology is not making people's lives easy easy easy but let them feel hope that if they want to do something (even paranoid) want it badly, it could make it a way, make it easy.

保存在印刷纸上的知识与保存在数字形式中的知识有什么区别？这根本的区别决定着可以把技术的魔力引入到哪里。

它是连接。

人们总是说，是，我知道这个很久了，它看起来就像什么APP，类似于XXX的想法，但实现这个超级困难，好多尝试过，但失败了，或者到目前为止没有人能做出来......。我喜欢Ted Nelson 的说法，一个好想法会引发无穷种解释，谁都无法做出Xanadu，谁也不必成为Xanadu。只要有想法就有变化，但无论如何，问题是类似的。

写作怎么链接起来。

现在的网络给了我们一个答案，是的，我们可以搜索 任何我们想要的东西，但连接是另一回事。

我认为连接不应该总是别人根据大的平均样本为你建立的东西。连接是我们一直在无意识地做的事情。

NLP在数据准备阶段需要人工处理数据（人工标注）。但这像是让人去“干活”，而不是一种自然而然的标注行动，我觉得不能真正模拟大脑「链接」功能。

只有工具可以做到这一点。当人主动去用工具，不管出于什么目的，一个tools for thoughts 就是一种自然的标注行为，一个简单的结构：嵌套 reference。

任何一个人 如果他「愿意」为一段信息进行标注 那他就是在计算 他动用的就是大脑的算力

"链接"不是我们有目的地证明的东西，而是我们一直在自然地做的事情。当我们阅读时，特别是当我们阅读和写作的行为链发生时。当我们选择阅读一篇文章时，我们发现了其中的联系，然后我们把它带入我们的写作中，当我们回头看时，我们看到记忆的形成。

我只是想把相关的东西记录在图谱中，将来无论我创作什么，与创作同时带来的东西都会通过图来分发。(最简单的形式是我[提到]你.eth，我们形成一个关系图，明显地或者我提到你block-under you public key，我们形成一个想法图)

我也不认为现在的社交媒体真的有助于建立任何联系，它只是把流量系统做得很好，让人们最好忘记自己，然后尽可能取悦每一个很容易扔掉他/她随机小♥️的人，所有人。

我认为理解复杂系统的网络理论将有助于理解「connection」这个问题，特别是我们可以了解到它在各种学科交叉中的语境、以及它被讨论的时间线。因此我找到了一个教材[[Albert-László Barabási]]的「网络科学」。

我认为网络的魅力在于，你能够为你想做的事情建立连接，你就是能通过6个人找到你想找的人（六度分隔），但你需要proof some work，这里技术的作用是帮助「你」建立连接，让证明更可见和可扩展。

实际上在我们需要帮助之前，我们并不希望有那么多的关系。

What is the difference of knowledge kept in printed paper from those kept in digital forms? This couldn't seem to me as a more interesting question, the fundamental difference is where we could bring the magic of technology into.

It’s the connection.

(People are always saying, "yeah I knew this for ages, it looks like something, it similar to xxx ideas but they are super hard, tried and failed or not working so far …" but the thing is the things that are “working” also not satisfy you.) i love Ted nelson said about idea has its variation.

wherever there are ideas there are variations, but no matter what, the question still is similar.

The web now gives us one answer, yes we can search for anything we wanted, but connection is another story.

Connection should be something that automatically be built every time you *build)) it.

*in my view Connection is not something we purposely prove but the things we are naturally doing all the time. When we read, esp when we read and write. When we choose to read a piece and we find the connection, and then we carry it in our writing, and when we look back we see the interactive memory formed.

I want to keep record of the relationship in the graph, and in the future no matter what I create, what brings alongside the creation will be distributed via the graph. (The simplest form is I [mentioned] you .eth and we form a relations graph, visibly or I reference your block-under you public key and we form an idea graph)

some work is necessarily coz that shows how much you want it.

I also don’t think the social media really helps in making the connection, it just makes the traffic system so well, and let people just forget themselves and please everyone who easily gives out his/her random little ♥️ .

I think the network theory of understanding the complex system will help in understanding the question. I think the beauty of a network is that you are able to do the things you want , find the people you want through 6 persons (theory), but you have to proof the work and the technology here is to help you build up the connections, make it more visible and scalable. it is not here to guide you from large average samples

We actually don’t want that much of relationship until we need help.

i thinks the mission of technology is not making people's lives easy easy easy but let them feel hope that if they want to do something (even paranoid) want it badly, it could make it a way, make it easy.

保存在印刷纸上的知识与保存在数字形式中的知识有什么区别？这根本的区别决定着可以把技术的魔力引入到哪里。

它是连接。

人们总是说，是，我知道这个很久了，它看起来就像什么APP，类似于XXX的想法，但实现这个超级困难，好多尝试过，但失败了，或者到目前为止没有人能做出来......。我喜欢Ted Nelson 的说法，一个好想法会引发无穷种解释，谁都无法做出Xanadu，谁也不必成为Xanadu。只要有想法就有变化，但无论如何，问题是类似的。

写作怎么链接起来。

现在的网络给了我们一个答案，是的，我们可以搜索 任何我们想要的东西，但连接是另一回事。

我认为连接不应该总是别人根据大的平均样本为你建立的东西。连接是我们一直在无意识地做的事情。

NLP在数据准备阶段需要人工处理数据（人工标注）。但这像是让人去“干活”，而不是一种自然而然的标注行动，我觉得不能真正模拟大脑「链接」功能。

只有工具可以做到这一点。当人主动去用工具，不管出于什么目的，一个tools for thoughts 就是一种自然的标注行为，一个简单的结构：嵌套 reference。

任何一个人 如果他「愿意」为一段信息进行标注 那他就是在计算 他动用的就是大脑的算力

"链接"不是我们有目的地证明的东西，而是我们一直在自然地做的事情。当我们阅读时，特别是当我们阅读和写作的行为链发生时。当我们选择阅读一篇文章时，我们发现了其中的联系，然后我们把它带入我们的写作中，当我们回头看时，我们看到记忆的形成。

我只是想把相关的东西记录在图谱中，将来无论我创作什么，与创作同时带来的东西都会通过图来分发。(最简单的形式是我[提到]你.eth，我们形成一个关系图，明显地或者我提到你block-under you public key，我们形成一个想法图)

我也不认为现在的社交媒体真的有助于建立任何联系，它只是把流量系统做得很好，让人们最好忘记自己，然后尽可能取悦每一个很容易扔掉他/她随机小♥️的人，所有人。

我认为理解复杂系统的网络理论将有助于理解「connection」这个问题，特别是我们可以了解到它在各种学科交叉中的语境、以及它被讨论的时间线。因此我找到了一个教材[[Albert-László Barabási]]的「网络科学」。

我认为网络的魅力在于，你能够为你想做的事情建立连接，你就是能通过6个人找到你想找的人（六度分隔），但你需要proof some work，这里技术的作用是帮助「你」建立连接，让证明更可见和可扩展。

实际上在我们需要帮助之前，我们并不希望有那么多的关系。