
The digital revolution democratized access to computing and communications. Analysts from all industries foretold the end of big intermediaries.
In the music industry, for example, it was said that musicians would be free from the tyranny of the record labels and would own the communication channel with their audience.
But the promise was broken.
In his book “Who Owns the Future?”, Jaron Lanier investigated the prophecies about the Internet being an instrument to democratize music. He found that a few artists indeed took advantage of this phenomenon to become global celebrities. But most saw their income collapse.
The digital revolution generated an enormous concentration of power and wealth. A market where the winner takes all and wealth is accumulated by the top 1%.

The Odyssey tells the story of Ulysses’ return to his city after the Trojan War. In this adventure, he had to pass through the island of the Sirens, mythological beings who seduced sailors with their singing and then ate them. In order to avoid succumbing to the deadly songs, Ulysses covered the ears of his sailors with wax and tied himself to the mast.

In the late 20th century, Silicon Valley learned it was not necessary to pay people for their work. Offering users “free” services such as email, photo sharing or 140-character messages would be enough to have millions of people working without compensation.
We spend millions of hours generating content for Facebook and curating a restaurant guide for Yelp. For free. That is the reason why Lanier compares them to sirens. They seduce us with the song of their “free products”. And they eat all of our data, which they monetize through advertising.



In the late 1980s, when Kodak was leader of the photographic industry, it employed more than 140,000 people. Today it is bankrupt. The other side of the coin was Facebook’s purchase of Instagram in 2012.
Zuckerberg paid $1 billion for a company of just 13 employees. The jobs that disappeared at Kodak are distributed among the millions of active Instagram users. But they don’t get paid for their contribution. Their compensation is access to the platform.
An unpaid job replaces one that was paid in the past. Jobs that, most of all, supported an important middle class.

It is often said that the Internet was a wave of disintermediation. It is true that it destroyed old intermediaries. But instead replaced them with bigger and more powerful ones.
Facebook and YouTube connect people, businesses, and advertisers. Amazon and eBay connect buyers with sellers. Uber connects passengers with cars. Airbnb connects hosts with guests. All connections go through the middleman that accumulates data and monetizes it.
Through their intermediation, these companies generate an enormous amount of wealth with few employees. Walmart, with its 2.3 million employees, has a market value of $250 billion.
Amazon has 340,000 employees and is worth $480 billion. Facebook, with just 20 thousand people, is worth more than 500 billion dollars. The function of their employees is basically keeping the servers running and the infrastructure secure.
We, the users, are the ones who generate the content. And it is the company who collects the benefits.
In short, the digital revolution gave us countless benefits in access to information and communication. It also has, however, a dark side.
Las Cortes de Internet de China: Hacia el Tribunal de Justicia del Futuro
En China, las cortes virtuales utilizan blockchain e inteligencia artificial para resolver disputas legales…Esta es una versión traducida y adaptada del artículo “Robot Justice: The Rise of China’s Internet Courts” publicado por Bryan Lynn. En China, millones de casos judiciales actualmente son resueltos por “cortes de Internet” que no requieren que los ciudadanos comparezcan en un juzgado físico. Estas “cortes inteligentes” incluyen jueces robot, programados con inteligencia artificial. Si a...
Cómo el Cripto Está Dando Forma a la Revolución Digital
Esta es una versión adaptada y traducida del texto “How Crypto Is Shaping the Digital Revolution” publicado por Mario Laul el 11 de octubre de 2021. En el pasado, definí al “cripto” (un término para denominar al blockchain y toda la innovación vinculada con la Web3) como una parte de la revolución digital que empezó hacia finales de la década de 1960 y comienzos de 1970 con la invención de las redes, los microprocesadores, y otras tecnología digitales que permiten la proliferación de computad...
Contratos Inteligentes, ¿Por Qué Importan?
Los contratos inteligentes son acuerdos escritos en código de computadora y registrados en un blockchain. Van a marcar el futuro de la industria legal…Este artículo es una versión traducida y adaptada del texto The Promise of Smart Contracts de Kate Sills. La película Fargo (1996) trata sobre las promesas. Se plantea si cumpliremos con nuestras promesas, incluso cuando vayan contra nuestro propio interés. Las promesas de la película no estaban respaldadas por el sistema legal. Y por un buen m...
Web3 & Legaltech Entrepreneur. Founder at Kleros and Proof of Humanity. Building the Future of Law.

The digital revolution democratized access to computing and communications. Analysts from all industries foretold the end of big intermediaries.
In the music industry, for example, it was said that musicians would be free from the tyranny of the record labels and would own the communication channel with their audience.
But the promise was broken.
In his book “Who Owns the Future?”, Jaron Lanier investigated the prophecies about the Internet being an instrument to democratize music. He found that a few artists indeed took advantage of this phenomenon to become global celebrities. But most saw their income collapse.
The digital revolution generated an enormous concentration of power and wealth. A market where the winner takes all and wealth is accumulated by the top 1%.

The Odyssey tells the story of Ulysses’ return to his city after the Trojan War. In this adventure, he had to pass through the island of the Sirens, mythological beings who seduced sailors with their singing and then ate them. In order to avoid succumbing to the deadly songs, Ulysses covered the ears of his sailors with wax and tied himself to the mast.

In the late 20th century, Silicon Valley learned it was not necessary to pay people for their work. Offering users “free” services such as email, photo sharing or 140-character messages would be enough to have millions of people working without compensation.
We spend millions of hours generating content for Facebook and curating a restaurant guide for Yelp. For free. That is the reason why Lanier compares them to sirens. They seduce us with the song of their “free products”. And they eat all of our data, which they monetize through advertising.



In the late 1980s, when Kodak was leader of the photographic industry, it employed more than 140,000 people. Today it is bankrupt. The other side of the coin was Facebook’s purchase of Instagram in 2012.
Zuckerberg paid $1 billion for a company of just 13 employees. The jobs that disappeared at Kodak are distributed among the millions of active Instagram users. But they don’t get paid for their contribution. Their compensation is access to the platform.
An unpaid job replaces one that was paid in the past. Jobs that, most of all, supported an important middle class.

It is often said that the Internet was a wave of disintermediation. It is true that it destroyed old intermediaries. But instead replaced them with bigger and more powerful ones.
Facebook and YouTube connect people, businesses, and advertisers. Amazon and eBay connect buyers with sellers. Uber connects passengers with cars. Airbnb connects hosts with guests. All connections go through the middleman that accumulates data and monetizes it.
Through their intermediation, these companies generate an enormous amount of wealth with few employees. Walmart, with its 2.3 million employees, has a market value of $250 billion.
Amazon has 340,000 employees and is worth $480 billion. Facebook, with just 20 thousand people, is worth more than 500 billion dollars. The function of their employees is basically keeping the servers running and the infrastructure secure.
We, the users, are the ones who generate the content. And it is the company who collects the benefits.
In short, the digital revolution gave us countless benefits in access to information and communication. It also has, however, a dark side.
Las Cortes de Internet de China: Hacia el Tribunal de Justicia del Futuro
En China, las cortes virtuales utilizan blockchain e inteligencia artificial para resolver disputas legales…Esta es una versión traducida y adaptada del artículo “Robot Justice: The Rise of China’s Internet Courts” publicado por Bryan Lynn. En China, millones de casos judiciales actualmente son resueltos por “cortes de Internet” que no requieren que los ciudadanos comparezcan en un juzgado físico. Estas “cortes inteligentes” incluyen jueces robot, programados con inteligencia artificial. Si a...
Cómo el Cripto Está Dando Forma a la Revolución Digital
Esta es una versión adaptada y traducida del texto “How Crypto Is Shaping the Digital Revolution” publicado por Mario Laul el 11 de octubre de 2021. En el pasado, definí al “cripto” (un término para denominar al blockchain y toda la innovación vinculada con la Web3) como una parte de la revolución digital que empezó hacia finales de la década de 1960 y comienzos de 1970 con la invención de las redes, los microprocesadores, y otras tecnología digitales que permiten la proliferación de computad...
Contratos Inteligentes, ¿Por Qué Importan?
Los contratos inteligentes son acuerdos escritos en código de computadora y registrados en un blockchain. Van a marcar el futuro de la industria legal…Este artículo es una versión traducida y adaptada del texto The Promise of Smart Contracts de Kate Sills. La película Fargo (1996) trata sobre las promesas. Se plantea si cumpliremos con nuestras promesas, incluso cuando vayan contra nuestro propio interés. Las promesas de la película no estaban respaldadas por el sistema legal. Y por un buen m...
Web3 & Legaltech Entrepreneur. Founder at Kleros and Proof of Humanity. Building the Future of Law.

Subscribe to Federico Ast

Subscribe to Federico Ast
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
<100 subscribers
<100 subscribers
No activity yet