Stories that are made up to support a point are the least interesting. ​​ Let's look at a good example in chicken soup for the soul.

​​ The rich man was on vacation at the seaside and met a fisherman who was fishing. The rich man said to the fisherman, if you borrow money to buy a boat and go out to sea to fish, you can hire a few helpers to increase production and increase profits. Buy a few more boats, start a fishing company, and invest in an aquatic product processing plant. Then take the company public and invest in real estate with the money from the circle, so that you will become a billionaire like me. ​​ Then what are you doing now? The fisherman asked, I am basking in the sun. The rich man answered. Isn't that the same as me? said the fisherman.

​​ This story was widely circulated in major newspapers and magazines. Those who write Chicken Soup for the Soul and believe in Chicken Soup for the Soul also think they have found the essence of things: a lot of times, what others are looking for is what we have now, but we are unaware of it. Therefore, rather than pursuing what we cannot pursue , we should cherish more what we already have. ​​ At first glance, this reason seems to be the case. In fact, his conclusion is good, but his inference is wrong. In order to draw his conclusion, the author of chicken soup stopped writing immediately when he wrote in a position that was beneficial to him, and did not go any further, so what we see is: he came to the point of view from the narrow angle of a fisherman. Look at the problem. ​​

If you step out of the author's circle of thinking about the problem and look at the same problem from the perspective of a billionaire, it's another matter. For a rich man, his enjoyment of life is not just to come to the beach to bask in the sun, but to enjoy the right to choose life: today he can come to sunbathe, tomorrow he can go horseback riding, the day after tomorrow he can go hunting in the forest, These are all occupations for fishermen, herders, and hunters, and they certainly do not find it unusual. But it is novel for the rich man. The key is that he can choose other things when he is tired of playing. He has this right. But the fisherman does not have the right to choose life. In order to make a living, the fisherman can only stay on the beach all day long, repeating his life every day until he grows old and dies. This is the tragedy of his life. ​​ If we look at Chicken Soup for the Soul in this way, we will see clearly that what they actually pay attention to is not objectivity, rigor, and correct methods, but how to make their reasoning look positive and bright. In order to achieve this goal, a lot of logic has been adopted by them Hide and avoid talking about it, but choose some angles that are beneficial to them to explain the problem. ​​

Let's go back and see, why do many people believe this story to be true? ​​ Obviously, the identity of this fisherman is a metaphor for most people in our contemporary society: most people are like fishermen for their livelihood and their families, and they have to work at their jobs every day, nine to five, and that’s it lifetime. Now that such a story has suddenly come, it's really reassuring! However, we still have to face the reality, this story not only does not solve the problem, but also makes many people's logic confusing. When reading this story about a fisherman and a rich man, I also found that there are several versions of the same story, and I want to explain different life insights. However, these insights are the same as the life insights I talked about before, they are all crooked truths. . ​​ Even when telling the same truth, the dialogue between the fisherman and the rich man is different, and the way of telling it is different. This has to make people suspect that chicken soup writers often make up a story in order to explain a truth that they think is correct.

Stories that are made up to support a point are the least interesting. ​​ Let's look at a good example in chicken soup for the soul.

​​ The rich man was on vacation at the seaside and met a fisherman who was fishing. The rich man said to the fisherman, if you borrow money to buy a boat and go out to sea to fish, you can hire a few helpers to increase production and increase profits. Buy a few more boats, start a fishing company, and invest in an aquatic product processing plant. Then take the company public and invest in real estate with the money from the circle, so that you will become a billionaire like me. ​​ Then what are you doing now? The fisherman asked, I am basking in the sun. The rich man answered. Isn't that the same as me? said the fisherman.

​​ This story was widely circulated in major newspapers and magazines. Those who write Chicken Soup for the Soul and believe in Chicken Soup for the Soul also think they have found the essence of things: a lot of times, what others are looking for is what we have now, but we are unaware of it. Therefore, rather than pursuing what we cannot pursue , we should cherish more what we already have. ​​ At first glance, this reason seems to be the case. In fact, his conclusion is good, but his inference is wrong. In order to draw his conclusion, the author of chicken soup stopped writing immediately when he wrote in a position that was beneficial to him, and did not go any further, so what we see is: he came to the point of view from the narrow angle of a fisherman. Look at the problem. ​​

If you step out of the author's circle of thinking about the problem and look at the same problem from the perspective of a billionaire, it's another matter. For a rich man, his enjoyment of life is not just to come to the beach to bask in the sun, but to enjoy the right to choose life: today he can come to sunbathe, tomorrow he can go horseback riding, the day after tomorrow he can go hunting in the forest, These are all occupations for fishermen, herders, and hunters, and they certainly do not find it unusual. But it is novel for the rich man. The key is that he can choose other things when he is tired of playing. He has this right. But the fisherman does not have the right to choose life. In order to make a living, the fisherman can only stay on the beach all day long, repeating his life every day until he grows old and dies. This is the tragedy of his life. ​​ If we look at Chicken Soup for the Soul in this way, we will see clearly that what they actually pay attention to is not objectivity, rigor, and correct methods, but how to make their reasoning look positive and bright. In order to achieve this goal, a lot of logic has been adopted by them Hide and avoid talking about it, but choose some angles that are beneficial to them to explain the problem. ​​

Let's go back and see, why do many people believe this story to be true? ​​ Obviously, the identity of this fisherman is a metaphor for most people in our contemporary society: most people are like fishermen for their livelihood and their families, and they have to work at their jobs every day, nine to five, and that’s it lifetime. Now that such a story has suddenly come, it's really reassuring! However, we still have to face the reality, this story not only does not solve the problem, but also makes many people's logic confusing. When reading this story about a fisherman and a rich man, I also found that there are several versions of the same story, and I want to explain different life insights. However, these insights are the same as the life insights I talked about before, they are all crooked truths. . ​​ Even when telling the same truth, the dialogue between the fisherman and the rich man is different, and the way of telling it is different. This has to make people suspect that chicken soup writers often make up a story in order to explain a truth that they think is correct.