会议时间:2018年11月21日-11月22日 地点:中国美术学院南山校区学术报告厅 参与会议请点击报名 工作坊时间:2018年11月23日 地点:中国美术学院南山校区4号楼405 参与工作坊请点击报名
会议总召:黄孙权,李士杰 学术筹备委员:高士明,管怀宾,黄孙权,李士杰,陆兴华,许煜
主办: 中国美术学院文化创新与视觉传播研究院 视觉中国协同创新中心 中国美术学院跨媒体艺术学院网络社会研究所
智能城市(smart city )近年呼声很高,成功案例却極少。我們明显的见到城市的管理主义的转向企业主导的城市,这是一个新的都市发展斗争:在地方政府─企业领导下的都市化(local-state-business-led urbanization)与由下而上的市民科技组织(buttom-up civil technology organization)间存在的张力,前者多半为了资本累积与技术本身的进步,而后者则企图用科技来解决市民真实遭遇的问题,尽管纯科技的黑客组织突袭式的反抗总是令人惊喜,却很难进到政治协商对话的框架中。因此,我们建议以智慧都市网络(intelligent urban fabric)作为问题意识,借用Henri Lefebvre之意, 亦即探询由技术差异地理学所产生的都市化与工业化之网络上所浮现出来的社会文化与城乡新关系。本次会议主旨,透过重新翻译“都市网络”(Urban Fabric)一词,重新理解智能城市于地方政府、市民团体与全球技术-经济新垄断范式间的合作与冲突,期能将黑客精神的分布式、去中心化的生产技术、以及由下而上的公众参与放在城市治理的政治对话的框架中,将“都市作为包含了市民权、永续以及科技发展之整体网络”重新立体化,因为,当下都市的一切无法独立于全球运算和区域政治分配的政治,传统地缘政治已被新的技术-堆层(stack)-经济所转换。 智能城市是近年全球的热门话题。
城市规划的纲领立基于为了共善(common good)。智能城市的技术虽大幅提高了都市问题与解决手段之效率,但却工具化了规划意识型态,其功能取向也忽视了未被定义、正在生成的社会动力以及数据中心化与算法不透明性,无处不在的监视也引发了新的伦理问题。此一专题讨论由智能城市专家分享自己的理念与实践,共同面对智能城市带来的机遇与挑战,公与私之上的新的共同。 主持:黄孙权 报告人:王坚、赛博·詹(Seb Chan)、若林干夫
市民是实现城市可能性的核心,是智能城市要造福的对象。当前智能城市发展的困境,正是自上而下的数据治理和硬件设施与人们城市生活的多样不匹配,市民幸福只是能被计算的高效率指标而已。技术进步不是为了迈向科技奇点(singularity),更应该有效地聚集政府主导与民间驱动两股力量,使城市整体长远发展。如何利用技术来赋予市民接近数据的权力?如何进一步弥补城市规划现有官僚范式中,缺乏的民间意见与集体意愿的表达的权利?如何让不可计算和无法估价的人类互动得以显现?这一专题讨论希望提出负责的、包容的、民主的技术,让城市成为智慧市民们的集体作品。 主持:李士杰 报告人:迈克尔·拉方(Michael LaFond)、邓东波(Deng Dongbo)、亚罗米尔(Jaromil)
城市基础设施的争夺与公民科技的发展都是城市的新器官和新武器,吾人透过智慧器官作为智能城市的探针,寻求物质性与认同价值的重造。此专题邀请技术与文化团体来分享具体案例,得见不同规模和功能的器官如何协同运作。对城市居民而言,了解越发不可见的智能器官,能更加意识到新科技可能导致的后果,启发对另类技术/器官的想象,打通器官与心智,人类与城市生态的循环。 主持:张圣琳 报告人:克里斯·朱利安(Chris Julien)、罗布·范·克拉内堡(Rob van Kranenburg)、沼田宗纯
传统地理空间与地缘政治的范型正逐渐被新的全球运算与区域治理所替代。欧盟个资法(GDPR)对抗社交媒体独角兽公司。政治实体和网络技术交织出的多政体(multi-form of government)需要什么样的政治经济学分析?多重权力的监管斗争又产生了什么样的空间?都市化与反都市是否可能同时发生?城市与乡村是连续体谬误,抑或资本主义实质吸纳的最后一哩路? 主持:高初 报告人:张圣琳 奈德·罗斯特(Ned Rossiter) 空间生产小组(Production of Space Team)
组织者: Dyne.org
罗布·范·克拉内堡(Rob van Kranenburg)
亚罗米尔(Jaromil)
弗里德里克·波利尼(Federico Bonelli )
阿斯帕西娅·本尼迪(Aspasia Beneti )
第一段「共振之旅」,透過 Dyne 「共同設計」(co-design)的共振工具,Dowse 網路路由器,在網路中探詢發現物聯網物件與資源。物聯網的本質是從身體區域網路到大範圍廣域網路,四層網路的無縫銜接。誰能夠確保了連結到這些閘道的「可追蹤性」(traceability)、永續性與安全性,誰就能提供最佳的、各個層次上的一切服務。DOWSE 工作坊大約以一天的時間讓與會者透過 DOWSE 開放硬體設定、探索與反映私人網段訊息、共享資源、網路覺察等訊息。Dyne 的藝術家與黑客會引導大家製作自己的 DOWSE 盒子,持續關注那些你想要追蹤的周遭訊息。參與者在工作坊將會被引介 DOWSE 這套工具,以及了解 dyne.org「共同設計」(co-design)的方法論;心中將會有一個想法,也許一兩個計畫,在接下來的空閒時候可以一一實踐。 第二段動手作工作坊「貍貓換太子」:身分認同與社會錢包。這個工作坊運用所謂的「思辨設計」(speculative design),也就是所謂「不解決問題為目的,而是讓你發現問題的設計」。:第一部分透過桌遊(table game)介紹複雜互動情境,第二部分,所浮現的想法經過共同設計(co-designing)的方式,運用自由軟體與 Dyne 的軟體,納入這些最有價值意見。Dyne 的論證是:運用不同結構設計、創造更有用的環境,可以用當前科技所啟發的元件來組裝資訊社會現實。使用工具:Dyne 軟體工具組、「思維設計」方法論,運用「禪室」(zenroom)這套加密語言在受限執行環境中建立沙盒(sandbox)。其次針對社會錢包(social wallet)這個客製化、可設定的彈性工具,後端對接資料庫,並可以銜接多重的區塊鏈。它可以用在補充性的貨幣系統,讓中小型企業或非營利組織設定紅利回饋機制,或連結到使用者既有的加密貨幣錢包。 第三部分是轉變分析:當藝術家與技術工作者,共享知識得以 (1)「實現永續設計」;(2) 啟動與推廣在地草根行動;(3) 在遙遠的區域仍能有效運作;(4) 涉入在地的社區時,我們會知道一個專案計畫是否能夠帶來轉變。這個部分理論是來自於 Viable System Model 與神學家 Stafford Beer 所詮釋的「模控系統理論」。 這種藝術與資訊理論幫助人們理解,我們怎麼樣學習與適應全新的環境:如何在資訊媒體之流,找到進步與躍升的方向。
[table id=8 /]
Conference Time: 2018/11/21——11/22 Conference Location: Academic Hall, China Academy of Art, Nanshan Campus, 218 NanShan Road, Hangzhou
Enroll Link Workshop Time: 2018/11/23 Workshop location: Room 405, Building 4, China Academy of Art, Enroll Link
Convener: Huang Sunquan, Li Shihchieh Academic committee: Gao Shiming, Guan Huaibin, Huang Sunquan, Li Shihchieh, Lu Xinhua, Yuk Hui
Host: Institute of Cultural Innovation and Visual Communication, China Academy of Art The Institute for Collaborative Innovation in Chinese Visual Studies The Institute of Network Society (INS), School of Inter-Media Art (SIMA) of China Academy of Art (CAA)
Today, the narrative and technics of smart city are mainly held by city governments and institutes in universities, for the sake of integration, experiment and examination, especially technics of transportation, logistics and disaster prevention. As for smart architecture, being the appliance and extension of remote control, is led by developers. Both smart city and smart architecture fall into the pitfalls of traditional urban planning and confront the problems of digital gentrification. Smart city only refers to governance and appliance of geographical data, therefore, we suggest to replace it with “intelligent urban fabric” (extracted from Henri Lefebvre’s “urban fabric”) as the problematic, thinking the new geopolitics reconstructed by planetary computing and stacks — a new technic.
In this conference, we use “intelligent urban fabric” as method and epistemology to develop smart city. Starting from distributed and decentralized production to the possibility of public participation, we examine the unequal distribution and regional difference caused by urban digital gentrification. This conference aims to see the potential of new digital technology and not to repeat the mistakes that had been made, finding ways for people to access high technology, avoiding the dislocation of hardware development and the actual need of people living in the city. In conclusion, “intelligent urban fabric” is a strategic proposal for us to think smart city+regional development+rural electronic markets as a whole.
Panel 1: Governance for common
The guideline of urban planning is planning for the common good and the technics of smart city highly boost the efficiency and means of solving urban problems. However, the ideology of urban planning is being instrumentalized. Some emerging and undefined social dynamics are covered under this function-oriented tendency. Centralization of data and non-transparency of algorithm are been ignored; omnipresent surveillance also brings up new ethical problems. In this panel, we invite CTOs form city governments and specialists of smart city around the world to share their ideas and practices with us. Together we face the challenges and opportunities coming with smart city, constructing a new common between public and private region in digital age. Host: Huang Sunquan Panelist: Wang Jian, Seb Chan, Mikio Wakabayashi
Panel 2: Smart Citizen
Smart citizen or smart city? People is the key to realize smart city and the who benefits from smart city. The current dilemma of smart city falls right on the dislocation between top-down digital governance and hardware development, and the actual need of people living in the city. Citizens’ happiness becomes merely an evaluable index of efficiency. In stead of reaching the technological singularity, the progress of technics should combine the power of government and civil society to improve the long-term development of the city as a whole. How to empower citizens the right to data with technics? How to further fix the lack of right to express collective opinions and public will of the society under today’s bureaucracy? How to reveal those uncomputable and invaluable interaction among humans? In this panel, we would like to propose responsible, inclusive and democratic technics, making the city a collective work of its citizens. Host: Li Shihchieh Panelist: Michael LaFond, Zheng Dongbo, Jaromil
Panel 3: Intelligent Organs
Both reclamation of infrastructures and development of civil technology are the new organs and weapons of a city. We use intelligent organs as a probe of smart city to find the materiality and possibility of reforming value identity. Enterprises, organizations and NGOs are invited to share actual cases in this panel, showing us how organs in different functions and scales cooperate together. To citizens, the more one understands about the intelligent organs that turn even hidden, the more one can sense the probable consequence brought by new technologies. The imagination of alternative technics/organs also help us to connect organs and minds and catalyze the cycle system of human-urban ecology. Host: Zhang Shenglin Panelist: Chris Julien, Rob van Kranenburg, Numada Muneyoshi
Panel 4: Restructuring Geo-Politics
Traditional spaces and geo-politics are gradually replaced by new planetary computing and regional governance: General Data Protection Regulation(GDPR) fights against big companies monopolizing social media; Apple moves its iCloud operation and data to Guizhou, China. Political entities and networking technics interweave governing groups into multi-form of governments. What kinds of political economics can be applied to analyze these multi-form of governments? What spaces are being produced after the surveillance conflicts among authorities? Is it possible that urbanization and de-urbanization happen simultaneously? Is the relation between city and country a continuum fallacy, or the last mile of real subsumption of capitalism? We expect to bring in discussion from different viewpoints in panel. Host: Gao Chu Panelist: Michael LaFond, Zheng Dongbo, Jaromil
Organizer: Dyne.org / Rob van Kranenburg, Jaromil, Federico Bonelli, Aspasia Beneti
[table id=8 /]
No comments yet