Simply put, Bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies must be sufficiently decentralized (to maintain operations outside of the state) and updated regularly (for continuous improvement). However, it was soon discovered that the nature of this update process gave rise to consideration of user rights.

Specifically, to implement changes, any user of cryptocurrency can only introduce new rules (make the new software incompatible with the old version) or modify existing rules (allow users to continue to run the old software and upgrade to the new software if necessary) hope).

Either choice brings inherent risks-creating incompatible software and risks, allowing the market to create new, incompatible cryptocurrencies. It is worth noting that Bitcoin extremists and crypto agnostics choose to view and manage this risk in different ways.

Bitcoin extremists believe that this choice is to ensure that they consider the defining characteristics of the system-the user's rights to the currency and the known money supply-and have chosen a roadmap defined by revisions that makes any splits unlikely Occurs (thus retaining the second guarantee).

On the contrary, cryptocurrency agnostics manage this risk by pursuing change with a more tolerant attitude towards incompatible software, reasoning that users should be able to use the currency as they please, and that the known supply is more of a function than a function. right

Simply put, Bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies must be sufficiently decentralized (to maintain operations outside of the state) and updated regularly (for continuous improvement). However, it was soon discovered that the nature of this update process gave rise to consideration of user rights.

Specifically, to implement changes, any user of cryptocurrency can only introduce new rules (make the new software incompatible with the old version) or modify existing rules (allow users to continue to run the old software and upgrade to the new software if necessary) hope).

Either choice brings inherent risks-creating incompatible software and risks, allowing the market to create new, incompatible cryptocurrencies. It is worth noting that Bitcoin extremists and crypto agnostics choose to view and manage this risk in different ways.

Bitcoin extremists believe that this choice is to ensure that they consider the defining characteristics of the system-the user's rights to the currency and the known money supply-and have chosen a roadmap defined by revisions that makes any splits unlikely Occurs (thus retaining the second guarantee).

On the contrary, cryptocurrency agnostics manage this risk by pursuing change with a more tolerant attitude towards incompatible software, reasoning that users should be able to use the currency as they please, and that the known supply is more of a function than a function. right