“It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest.”

― Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations

“The time during which the labourer works, is the time during which the capitalist consumes the labour-power he has purchased of him.”

― Karl Marx, Das Kapital

“[I]mpact=profit [is] the principle that positive impact to the collective should be rewarded with profit to the individual.”

— The Optimism Collective

It’s not news to us that something is wrong with capitalism, this system that has brought so much material wealth to so many, but has also destroyed traditional ways of life, brought large-scale, potentially irreversible damage to our planet, and has turned most people — many of whom want nothing more than to leave work and reunite with the selves they left at home — into data points on the map of economic conquest.

This was foreseen, but it is not our destiny.

In modern times, there have been two foundational texts upon which much of our social and economic structures have been built: The Wealth of Nations (1776) by Adam Smith and Das Kapital (1867) by Karl Marx.

Although academia spills much ink over their differences, at their core they are philosophical texts rich with social and economic data that reach back into premodern history to demonstrate why and how the world is as it is and what can be done to further their respective visions of human progress.

Even if you don’t agree with what they wrote, it’s hard to argue that the two are great thinkers struggling with big questions, certain in their seemingly incompatible visions for how to lift up humanity and move the needle of progress forward.

Adams and Marx offer complex socio-economic theories, and without a framework it’s difficult to know how to move through their work. One of the best ways to analyze competing information is via dialectics, with the basic formula as follows: Thesis → Antithesis → Synthesis, as explained in this fun graph:

https://sketchplanations.com/thesis-antithesis-synthesis

The Wealth of Nations, written nearly 100 years before Das Kapital, sets forth the thesis that society will be better off if individuals pursue their own self interest inside of an unrestricted, competitive marketplace. As a response to witnessing the dehumanizing effects of unfettered ‘capitalism’ apparent to Marx, he published his antithesis, Das Kapital, arguing that the economic system promoted by Smith exploited workers, forcing them to disjoin their labor and its fruits, causing alienation from their own worth because their labor is used to enrich others, to maximize profits for the “owners of the means of production”. To resolve this conflict, Marx advocated for a worker-led revolution to overthrow the capitalists and institute a society where all had equal status and wealth, a type of social welfare state.

Fast forward to the present, and even the most ardent Marxist is forced to see that the implementation of his ideas have proven ruinous, even if his intellectual work may have been priceless. And yet, as we exist in this hypercapitalism where we labor for the profit of others while spending our leisure time enriching the shareholders of social media platforms, many of us wonder if there is another way to create value, to feel valued.

Two hundred and fifty years after Smith and 150 years after Marx, it’s time for a more Optimistic economic model that combines the best parts of capitalism (competition as determined by a marketplace) and socialism (care and support for our fellow humans) to create a synthesis of the two, an Optimistic Vision, and share it with the world.

The result is the Optimistic Collective’s simple equation to build a better world:

impact=profit

At the core of the Optimistic Vision is the idea that digital technologies will enable us to organize and to coordinate as never before, to leave behind the “inherited economic rulesets built for the physical world” and to reimagine our socio-economic architecture to build a new set of operating procedures for a blockchain-powered digital age.

The Optimism Collective may be glass-half-full by nature, but they are also pragmatists, and recognize that marketplace dynamics predate capitalism and are as embedded into our social fabric as long-term relationships. Their response to this tension is to create a regenerative cryptoeconomic model that uses protocol profits to sustain a retroactive public goods funding model built to reward those who make the greatest impact on citizens of the Optimism Collective.

The core idea of impact=profit is that we don’t have to choose between people or profits — digital democratic governance and recursive retroactive goods funding models means that we can have our block of cake and eat it too.

And that’s just to start, as Optimism’s ambitions hardly stop where digital borders end:

“We imagine a future in which the Collective expands beyond the digital realm and into the physical world. The idea that a decentralized ecosystem could reliably provide for basic human needs at scale may seem idealistic today, but it will seem commonplace tomorrow. We start small out of a sense of pragmatism, but we aim big out of an overwhelming sense of Optimism.”

— The Optimistic Vision

Optimism may not have set out to resolve a profound tension 250 years in the making, but they might just end up doing it anyway. When you’re helping to set the foundations for a liberating economic revolution, you can be forgiven for thinking it looks mundane. But as with the blockchain, the magic of this revolution is that you don’t need to understand the specifics of how it works to understand the universality of its application.

Just as the internet set information free; the blockchain will set you free.

Hiro Kennelly is a writer, editor, and coordinator at BanklessDAO, an Associate at Bankless Consulting, and is still a DAOpunk.

“It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest.”

― Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations

“The time during which the labourer works, is the time during which the capitalist consumes the labour-power he has purchased of him.”

― Karl Marx, Das Kapital

“[I]mpact=profit [is] the principle that positive impact to the collective should be rewarded with profit to the individual.”

— The Optimism Collective

It’s not news to us that something is wrong with capitalism, this system that has brought so much material wealth to so many, but has also destroyed traditional ways of life, brought large-scale, potentially irreversible damage to our planet, and has turned most people — many of whom want nothing more than to leave work and reunite with the selves they left at home — into data points on the map of economic conquest.

This was foreseen, but it is not our destiny.

In modern times, there have been two foundational texts upon which much of our social and economic structures have been built: The Wealth of Nations (1776) by Adam Smith and Das Kapital (1867) by Karl Marx.

Although academia spills much ink over their differences, at their core they are philosophical texts rich with social and economic data that reach back into premodern history to demonstrate why and how the world is as it is and what can be done to further their respective visions of human progress.

Even if you don’t agree with what they wrote, it’s hard to argue that the two are great thinkers struggling with big questions, certain in their seemingly incompatible visions for how to lift up humanity and move the needle of progress forward.

Adams and Marx offer complex socio-economic theories, and without a framework it’s difficult to know how to move through their work. One of the best ways to analyze competing information is via dialectics, with the basic formula as follows: Thesis → Antithesis → Synthesis, as explained in this fun graph:

https://sketchplanations.com/thesis-antithesis-synthesis

The Wealth of Nations, written nearly 100 years before Das Kapital, sets forth the thesis that society will be better off if individuals pursue their own self interest inside of an unrestricted, competitive marketplace. As a response to witnessing the dehumanizing effects of unfettered ‘capitalism’ apparent to Marx, he published his antithesis, Das Kapital, arguing that the economic system promoted by Smith exploited workers, forcing them to disjoin their labor and its fruits, causing alienation from their own worth because their labor is used to enrich others, to maximize profits for the “owners of the means of production”. To resolve this conflict, Marx advocated for a worker-led revolution to overthrow the capitalists and institute a society where all had equal status and wealth, a type of social welfare state.

Fast forward to the present, and even the most ardent Marxist is forced to see that the implementation of his ideas have proven ruinous, even if his intellectual work may have been priceless. And yet, as we exist in this hypercapitalism where we labor for the profit of others while spending our leisure time enriching the shareholders of social media platforms, many of us wonder if there is another way to create value, to feel valued.

Two hundred and fifty years after Smith and 150 years after Marx, it’s time for a more Optimistic economic model that combines the best parts of capitalism (competition as determined by a marketplace) and socialism (care and support for our fellow humans) to create a synthesis of the two, an Optimistic Vision, and share it with the world.

The result is the Optimistic Collective’s simple equation to build a better world:

impact=profit

At the core of the Optimistic Vision is the idea that digital technologies will enable us to organize and to coordinate as never before, to leave behind the “inherited economic rulesets built for the physical world” and to reimagine our socio-economic architecture to build a new set of operating procedures for a blockchain-powered digital age.

The Optimism Collective may be glass-half-full by nature, but they are also pragmatists, and recognize that marketplace dynamics predate capitalism and are as embedded into our social fabric as long-term relationships. Their response to this tension is to create a regenerative cryptoeconomic model that uses protocol profits to sustain a retroactive public goods funding model built to reward those who make the greatest impact on citizens of the Optimism Collective.

The core idea of impact=profit is that we don’t have to choose between people or profits — digital democratic governance and recursive retroactive goods funding models means that we can have our block of cake and eat it too.

And that’s just to start, as Optimism’s ambitions hardly stop where digital borders end:

“We imagine a future in which the Collective expands beyond the digital realm and into the physical world. The idea that a decentralized ecosystem could reliably provide for basic human needs at scale may seem idealistic today, but it will seem commonplace tomorrow. We start small out of a sense of pragmatism, but we aim big out of an overwhelming sense of Optimism.”

— The Optimistic Vision

Optimism may not have set out to resolve a profound tension 250 years in the making, but they might just end up doing it anyway. When you’re helping to set the foundations for a liberating economic revolution, you can be forgiven for thinking it looks mundane. But as with the blockchain, the magic of this revolution is that you don’t need to understand the specifics of how it works to understand the universality of its application.

Just as the internet set information free; the blockchain will set you free.

Hiro Kennelly is a writer, editor, and coordinator at BanklessDAO, an Associate at Bankless Consulting, and is still a DAOpunk.