If the soul wants to go far, the body must be on the way "with big limbs and simple minds." I don't know how many people got screwed by that. At first, it made sense. In ancient times, people's living and learning conditions were limited. Manual laborers had to participate in labor production for a long time in order to make a living. It was difficult for them to have more time and money to learn knowledge. In order to gain fame and fame, scholars can only study hard indoors, with relatively little physical exercise, so they appear to be weak. Perhaps people observe this objective phenomenon and naturally develop the description of "brawn, brawn", or perhaps scholars tend to promote such views in order to preserve the dignity of the group. The first implied that the manual laborer, though physically strong, was nothing great; the second implied that there was no shame in being weak, and that brains were better than anything else. However, language can in turn affect thinking. This sentence describing the phenomenon "What" may be interpreted as "Why" by people who do not understand it. For example, people in good health may think: maybe they are not born to read; And those who are good at learning will think: it doesn't matter if you don't exercise, limbs developed, brains may become stupid. It seems that the sum of physical and mental strength is a fixed value, on the one hand account for more, on the other hand naturally less. But is this really the case? Look beyond the fog and the truth may surprise you. Francis Galton, an English scientist, invented an important concept in statistics: correlation. He found that if a person is highly intelligent, they tend to be better in other areas, such as self-discipline, financial ability, including physical condition, which means that good things tend to be positively correlated. Can it be inferred that good health and good mind are also positively correlated? I think the answer is yes. Because exercise can regulate a variety of hormones in the human body, so that people reach the best state, so that the internal ecosystem of the body full of energy and vitality. An active person's ecosystem is like a spring, while a sedentary person's ecosystem is more like a pool of stagnant water.

In the long run, some people who do not want to exercise are more prone to anxiety, depression, depression, depression and other bad feelings, and stress toxins can destroy the connections between billions of nerve cells in the brain, gradually shrinking parts of the brain, suggesting that a person who is chronically inactive may become "stupid". The other surprisingly good news is that exercise can cause the brain to grow more new neurons, which means exercise can physically make you smarter. It is important to know that when each of us inherits the genes of our parents, there must be differences in the starting level of the brain. For example, in the same brain area, some people have more nerve cells and some people have fewer nerve cells. Therefore, different children show obvious differences in talent in language, graphics, music and other aspects. But with learning and development, these biological differences gradually narrow, and the struggle between people is all about effort. However, the findings of brain science suggest that exercise can initiate "neurogenesis," and since there is a large overlap between attention, consciousness and motor brain regions, exercise can also directly physically improve our ability to focus, control and think, among other things. It follows that exercise not only makes people in better shape and better spirits, but also improves brain function, attention, memory, understanding and self-control, which leads to better learning, greater achievement and access to resources. Exercise is the starting point of the positive correlation factors of life happiness. The good model is "exercise + learning" Even with this conclusion, we still cannot dispel the question: why do so many people actively engage in exercise, but do not show a positive correlation? It's a question worth exploring, but there are good reasons for it. The message is not to be ignored: Although scientific studies have shown that exercise causes the brain to grow new neurons, these neurons need to grow out of their axons and dendrites before they can become real nerve cells. Put simply, a newborn neuron is like a tree that needs to grow branches and leaves in order to survive. So it's not the exercise that's the key, it's the scheduling and the environmental stimulation after the exercise. The model that works is this: In 1-2 hours after exercise, do high-intensity and difficult mental activities, such as reading, problem solving, memorizing, writing, programming, etc., or some physical activities that require complex skills, such as dancing, piano, and participate in social activities that are different from the past, such as contact with new environment, people or things, so that new neurons can be stimulated and grow continuously. In other words, after exercise, the brain needs to be tested or challenged enough to keep getting smarter. And the exercise-and-learn model requires persistence, since it typically takes 28 days for new neurons to mature. This is good news for brain workers. If you stick to the "exercise + study" mode for a long time, your brain will become more and more flexible unconsciously. With more and more neural connections in the brain, wider and wider signaling pathways, and faster and faster reaction times, people can learn more easily, just as the operating memory of a computer keeps expanding and the hardware conditions get stronger and stronger.

If the soul wants to go far, the body must be on the way "with big limbs and simple minds." I don't know how many people got screwed by that. At first, it made sense. In ancient times, people's living and learning conditions were limited. Manual laborers had to participate in labor production for a long time in order to make a living. It was difficult for them to have more time and money to learn knowledge. In order to gain fame and fame, scholars can only study hard indoors, with relatively little physical exercise, so they appear to be weak. Perhaps people observe this objective phenomenon and naturally develop the description of "brawn, brawn", or perhaps scholars tend to promote such views in order to preserve the dignity of the group. The first implied that the manual laborer, though physically strong, was nothing great; the second implied that there was no shame in being weak, and that brains were better than anything else. However, language can in turn affect thinking. This sentence describing the phenomenon "What" may be interpreted as "Why" by people who do not understand it. For example, people in good health may think: maybe they are not born to read; And those who are good at learning will think: it doesn't matter if you don't exercise, limbs developed, brains may become stupid. It seems that the sum of physical and mental strength is a fixed value, on the one hand account for more, on the other hand naturally less. But is this really the case? Look beyond the fog and the truth may surprise you. Francis Galton, an English scientist, invented an important concept in statistics: correlation. He found that if a person is highly intelligent, they tend to be better in other areas, such as self-discipline, financial ability, including physical condition, which means that good things tend to be positively correlated. Can it be inferred that good health and good mind are also positively correlated? I think the answer is yes. Because exercise can regulate a variety of hormones in the human body, so that people reach the best state, so that the internal ecosystem of the body full of energy and vitality. An active person's ecosystem is like a spring, while a sedentary person's ecosystem is more like a pool of stagnant water.

In the long run, some people who do not want to exercise are more prone to anxiety, depression, depression, depression and other bad feelings, and stress toxins can destroy the connections between billions of nerve cells in the brain, gradually shrinking parts of the brain, suggesting that a person who is chronically inactive may become "stupid". The other surprisingly good news is that exercise can cause the brain to grow more new neurons, which means exercise can physically make you smarter. It is important to know that when each of us inherits the genes of our parents, there must be differences in the starting level of the brain. For example, in the same brain area, some people have more nerve cells and some people have fewer nerve cells. Therefore, different children show obvious differences in talent in language, graphics, music and other aspects. But with learning and development, these biological differences gradually narrow, and the struggle between people is all about effort. However, the findings of brain science suggest that exercise can initiate "neurogenesis," and since there is a large overlap between attention, consciousness and motor brain regions, exercise can also directly physically improve our ability to focus, control and think, among other things. It follows that exercise not only makes people in better shape and better spirits, but also improves brain function, attention, memory, understanding and self-control, which leads to better learning, greater achievement and access to resources. Exercise is the starting point of the positive correlation factors of life happiness. The good model is "exercise + learning" Even with this conclusion, we still cannot dispel the question: why do so many people actively engage in exercise, but do not show a positive correlation? It's a question worth exploring, but there are good reasons for it. The message is not to be ignored: Although scientific studies have shown that exercise causes the brain to grow new neurons, these neurons need to grow out of their axons and dendrites before they can become real nerve cells. Put simply, a newborn neuron is like a tree that needs to grow branches and leaves in order to survive. So it's not the exercise that's the key, it's the scheduling and the environmental stimulation after the exercise. The model that works is this: In 1-2 hours after exercise, do high-intensity and difficult mental activities, such as reading, problem solving, memorizing, writing, programming, etc., or some physical activities that require complex skills, such as dancing, piano, and participate in social activities that are different from the past, such as contact with new environment, people or things, so that new neurons can be stimulated and grow continuously. In other words, after exercise, the brain needs to be tested or challenged enough to keep getting smarter. And the exercise-and-learn model requires persistence, since it typically takes 28 days for new neurons to mature. This is good news for brain workers. If you stick to the "exercise + study" mode for a long time, your brain will become more and more flexible unconsciously. With more and more neural connections in the brain, wider and wider signaling pathways, and faster and faster reaction times, people can learn more easily, just as the operating memory of a computer keeps expanding and the hardware conditions get stronger and stronger.